Statement implies that GITHUB_TOKEN cannot be used to install private packages

[jlawrence]

For clarity and correctness, I suggest the following change to this line:

Remove the phrase "(which GITHUB_TOKEN can't access)", and add the following sentence as a new bullet point:

"If you grant a repository read access to a private package, then that repository's workflows can use GITHUB_TOKEN to install that package (https://docs.github.com/en/packages/learn-github-packages/configuring-a-packages-access-control-and-visibility#ensuring-workflow-access-to-your-package)"

[welcome]

Thanks for opening this issue. A GitHub docs team member should be by to give feedback soon. In the meantime, please check out the contributing guidelines.

[nguyenalex836]

@jlawrence Thank you for raising this issue! I'll get this triaged for review ✨ Our team will provide feedback regarding the best next steps for this issue - thanks for your patience! 💛

[github-actions]

Thanks for opening an issue! We've triaged this issue for technical review by a subject matter expert 👀

[potrostar-410]

Thats need do, now,is important,make this kind of changes to get better day by day,so like this,stop to make me damage,the inhustice hurts,and life Is a ruleta!

[nguyenalex836]

@jlawrence Thank you so much for your patience while our SME team reviewed! They wanted to relay the following:

[Instead of another bullet point] I think it would just be better to link to the access control and visibility page, because there is a lot of nuance that it's impossible to capture in a quick bulleted list.

Would you be willing to submit a PR to update the docs to align with guidance above? 💛