-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathhost-iptables.test.ts
More file actions
1119 lines (960 loc) · 43 KB
/
host-iptables.test.ts
File metadata and controls
1119 lines (960 loc) · 43 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
import { ensureFirewallNetwork, setupHostIptables, cleanupHostIptables, cleanupFirewallNetwork, __testing, HostAccessConfig, isValidPortSpec } from './host-iptables';
import execa from 'execa';
// Mock execa
jest.mock('execa');
const mockedExeca = execa as jest.MockedFunction<typeof execa>;
// Mock getLocalDockerEnv to return a predictable env for assertions
jest.mock('./docker-manager', () => ({
getLocalDockerEnv: () => process.env,
}));
// Mock logger to avoid console output during tests
jest.mock('./logger', () => ({
logger: {
debug: jest.fn(),
info: jest.fn(),
warn: jest.fn(),
error: jest.fn(),
success: jest.fn(),
},
}));
describe('host-iptables', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
jest.clearAllMocks();
__testing._resetIpv6State();
});
describe('ensureFirewallNetwork', () => {
it('should return network config when network already exists', async () => {
// Mock successful network inspect (network exists)
mockedExeca.mockResolvedValue({
stdout: '',
stderr: '',
exitCode: 0,
} as any);
const result = await ensureFirewallNetwork();
expect(result).toEqual({
subnet: '172.30.0.0/24',
squidIp: '172.30.0.10',
agentIp: '172.30.0.20',
proxyIp: '172.30.0.30',
});
// Should only check if network exists, not create it
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('docker', ['network', 'inspect', 'awf-net'], { env: expect.any(Object) });
expect(mockedExeca).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('docker', expect.arrayContaining(['network', 'create']), expect.anything());
});
it('should create network when it does not exist', async () => {
// First call (network inspect) fails - network doesn't exist
// Second call (network create) succeeds
mockedExeca
.mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error('network not found'))
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
stdout: '',
stderr: '',
exitCode: 0,
} as any);
const result = await ensureFirewallNetwork();
expect(result).toEqual({
subnet: '172.30.0.0/24',
squidIp: '172.30.0.10',
agentIp: '172.30.0.20',
proxyIp: '172.30.0.30',
});
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('docker', ['network', 'inspect', 'awf-net'], { env: expect.any(Object) });
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('docker', [
'network',
'create',
'awf-net',
'--subnet',
'172.30.0.0/24',
'--opt',
'com.docker.network.bridge.name=fw-bridge',
], { env: expect.any(Object) });
});
});
describe('setupHostIptables', () => {
it('should throw error if iptables permission denied', async () => {
const permissionError: any = new Error('Permission denied');
permissionError.stderr = 'iptables: Permission denied';
mockedExeca
// Mock getNetworkBridgeName
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
stdout: 'fw-bridge',
stderr: '',
exitCode: 0,
} as any)
// Mock iptables -L DOCKER-USER (permission check)
.mockRejectedValueOnce(permissionError);
await expect(setupHostIptables('172.30.0.10', 3128, ['8.8.8.8', '8.8.4.4'])).rejects.toThrow(
'Permission denied: iptables commands require root privileges'
);
});
it('should create FW_WRAPPER chain and add rules', async () => {
mockedExeca
// Mock getNetworkBridgeName
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
stdout: 'fw-bridge',
stderr: '',
exitCode: 0,
} as any)
// Mock iptables -L DOCKER-USER (permission check)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
stdout: '',
stderr: '',
exitCode: 0,
} as any)
// Mock chain existence check (doesn't exist)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
exitCode: 1,
} as any);
// Mock all subsequent iptables calls
mockedExeca.mockResolvedValue({
stdout: 'Chain DOCKER-USER\nChain FW_WRAPPER',
stderr: '',
exitCode: 0,
} as any);
await setupHostIptables('172.30.0.10', 3128, ['8.8.8.8', '8.8.4.4']);
// Verify chain was created
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', ['-t', 'filter', '-N', 'FW_WRAPPER']);
// Verify allow Squid proxy rule
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-s', '172.30.0.10',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
// Verify established/related rule
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-m', 'conntrack', '--ctstate', 'ESTABLISHED,RELATED',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
// Verify DNS forwarding rules for default upstream servers
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-p', 'udp', '-d', '8.8.8.8', '--dport', '53',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
// Verify traffic to Squid rule
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-p', 'tcp', '-d', '172.30.0.10', '--dport', '3128',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
// Verify default deny with logging
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-j', 'LOG', '--log-prefix', '[FW_BLOCKED_OTHER] ', '--log-level', '4',
]);
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-j', 'REJECT', '--reject-with', 'icmp-port-unreachable',
]);
// Verify jump from DOCKER-USER to FW_WRAPPER
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-I', 'DOCKER-USER', '1',
'-i', 'fw-bridge',
'-j', 'FW_WRAPPER',
]);
});
it('should cleanup existing chain before creating new one', async () => {
mockedExeca
// Mock getNetworkBridgeName
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
stdout: 'fw-bridge',
stderr: '',
exitCode: 0,
} as any)
// Mock iptables -L DOCKER-USER (permission check)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
stdout: '',
stderr: '',
exitCode: 0,
} as any)
// Mock chain existence check (exists)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
exitCode: 0,
} as any)
// Mock DOCKER-USER list with existing references
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
stdout: '1 FW_WRAPPER all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0\n',
stderr: '',
exitCode: 0,
} as any);
// Mock all subsequent calls
mockedExeca.mockResolvedValue({
stdout: '',
stderr: '',
exitCode: 0,
} as any);
await setupHostIptables('172.30.0.10', 3128, ['8.8.8.8', '8.8.4.4']);
// Should delete reference from DOCKER-USER
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-D', 'DOCKER-USER', '1',
], { reject: false });
// Should flush existing chain
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-F', 'FW_WRAPPER',
], { reject: false });
// Should delete existing chain
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-X', 'FW_WRAPPER',
], { reject: false });
// Then create new chain
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-N', 'FW_WRAPPER',
]);
});
it('should allow localhost traffic', async () => {
mockedExeca
// Mock getNetworkBridgeName
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
stdout: 'fw-bridge',
stderr: '',
exitCode: 0,
} as any)
// Mock iptables -L DOCKER-USER (permission check)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
stdout: '',
stderr: '',
exitCode: 0,
} as any)
// Mock chain existence check
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
exitCode: 1,
} as any);
mockedExeca.mockResolvedValue({
stdout: '',
stderr: '',
exitCode: 0,
} as any);
await setupHostIptables('172.30.0.10', 3128, ['8.8.8.8', '8.8.4.4']);
// Verify localhost rules
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-o', 'lo',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-d', '127.0.0.0/8',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
});
it('should block multicast and link-local traffic', async () => {
mockedExeca
// Mock getNetworkBridgeName
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
stdout: 'fw-bridge',
stderr: '',
exitCode: 0,
} as any)
// Mock iptables -L DOCKER-USER (permission check)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
stdout: '',
stderr: '',
exitCode: 0,
} as any)
// Mock chain existence check
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
exitCode: 1,
} as any);
mockedExeca.mockResolvedValue({
stdout: '',
stderr: '',
exitCode: 0,
} as any);
await setupHostIptables('172.30.0.10', 3128, ['8.8.8.8', '8.8.4.4']);
// Verify multicast block
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-m', 'addrtype', '--dst-type', 'MULTICAST',
'-j', 'REJECT', '--reject-with', 'icmp-port-unreachable',
]);
// Verify link-local block (169.254.0.0/16)
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-d', '169.254.0.0/16',
'-j', 'REJECT', '--reject-with', 'icmp-port-unreachable',
]);
// Verify multicast range block (224.0.0.0/4)
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-d', '224.0.0.0/4',
'-j', 'REJECT', '--reject-with', 'icmp-port-unreachable',
]);
});
it('should log and block all UDP traffic (DNS to non-whitelisted servers gets blocked)', async () => {
mockedExeca
// Mock getNetworkBridgeName
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
stdout: 'fw-bridge',
stderr: '',
exitCode: 0,
} as any)
// Mock iptables -L DOCKER-USER (permission check)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
stdout: '',
stderr: '',
exitCode: 0,
} as any)
// Mock chain existence check
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
exitCode: 1,
} as any);
mockedExeca.mockResolvedValue({
stdout: '',
stderr: '',
exitCode: 0,
} as any);
await setupHostIptables('172.30.0.10', 3128, ['8.8.8.8', '8.8.4.4']);
// Verify UDP logging (all UDP, DNS to whitelisted servers is allowed earlier in chain)
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-p', 'udp',
'-j', 'LOG', '--log-prefix', '[FW_BLOCKED_UDP] ', '--log-level', '4',
]);
// Verify UDP rejection
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-p', 'udp',
'-j', 'REJECT', '--reject-with', 'icmp-port-unreachable',
]);
});
it('should add API proxy sidecar rules when apiProxyIp is provided', async () => {
mockedExeca
// Mock getNetworkBridgeName
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: 'fw-bridge', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
// Mock iptables -L DOCKER-USER (permission check)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
// Mock chain existence check (doesn't exist)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ exitCode: 1 } as any);
mockedExeca.mockResolvedValue({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any);
await setupHostIptables('172.30.0.10', 3128, ['8.8.8.8', '8.8.4.4'], '172.30.0.30');
// Verify API proxy sidecar rule was added with port range
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', expect.arrayContaining([
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-p', 'tcp', '-d', '172.30.0.30',
]));
});
it('should throw error when bridge name is not found', async () => {
// Mock getNetworkBridgeName returning empty/null
mockedExeca.mockResolvedValueOnce({
stdout: '',
stderr: '',
exitCode: 0,
} as any);
await expect(setupHostIptables('172.30.0.10', 3128, ['8.8.8.8', '8.8.4.4'])).rejects.toThrow(
"Failed to get bridge name for network 'awf-net'"
);
});
it('should create DOCKER-USER chain when it does not exist', async () => {
const noChainError: any = new Error('No chain/target/match by that name');
noChainError.stderr = 'No chain/target/match by that name';
mockedExeca
// Mock getNetworkBridgeName
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: 'fw-bridge', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
// Mock iptables -L DOCKER-USER (chain doesn't exist)
.mockRejectedValueOnce(noChainError)
// Mock iptables -N DOCKER-USER (create chain)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
// Mock chain existence check (FW_WRAPPER doesn't exist)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ exitCode: 1 } as any);
// Mock all subsequent calls
mockedExeca.mockResolvedValue({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any);
await setupHostIptables('172.30.0.10', 3128, ['8.8.8.8', '8.8.4.4']);
// Verify DOCKER-USER chain was created
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', ['-t', 'filter', '-N', 'DOCKER-USER']);
});
it('should skip inserting DOCKER-USER jump rule if it already exists', async () => {
mockedExeca
// Mock getNetworkBridgeName
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: 'fw-bridge', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
// Mock iptables -L DOCKER-USER (permission check)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
// Mock chain existence check (doesn't exist)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ exitCode: 1 } as any);
// Default mock: all calls succeed, and DOCKER-USER listing includes bridge rule
mockedExeca.mockResolvedValue({
stdout: '1 FW_WRAPPER all -- -i fw-bridge 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0',
stderr: '',
exitCode: 0,
} as any);
await setupHostIptables('172.30.0.10', 3128, ['8.8.8.8', '8.8.4.4']);
// Should NOT insert a new rule since it already exists
expect(mockedExeca).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-I', 'DOCKER-USER', '1',
'-i', 'fw-bridge',
'-j', 'FW_WRAPPER',
]);
});
it('should not create IPv6 chain but should add DNS forwarding rules', async () => {
mockedExeca
// Mock getNetworkBridgeName
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
stdout: 'fw-bridge',
stderr: '',
exitCode: 0,
} as any)
// Mock iptables -L DOCKER-USER (permission check)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
stdout: '',
stderr: '',
exitCode: 0,
} as any)
// Mock chain existence check (IPv4 chain doesn't exist)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({
exitCode: 1,
} as any);
mockedExeca.mockResolvedValue({
stdout: '',
stderr: '',
exitCode: 0,
} as any);
await setupHostIptables('172.30.0.10', 3128, ['8.8.8.8', '8.8.4.4']);
// Verify no IPv6 chain
expect(mockedExeca).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('ip6tables', ['-t', 'filter', '-N', 'FW_WRAPPER_V6']);
// DNS forwarding rules should exist for default upstream servers (8.8.8.8, 8.8.4.4)
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-p', 'udp', '-d', '8.8.8.8', '--dport', '53',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-p', 'udp', '-d', '8.8.4.4', '--dport', '53',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
});
it('should disable IPv6 via sysctl when ip6tables unavailable', async () => {
// Make ip6tables unavailable
mockedExeca
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: 'fw-bridge', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
// iptables -L DOCKER-USER permission check
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
// chain existence check (doesn't exist)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ exitCode: 1 } as any);
// All subsequent calls succeed (except ip6tables)
mockedExeca.mockImplementation(((cmd: string, _args: string[]) => {
if (cmd === 'ip6tables') {
return Promise.reject(new Error('ip6tables not found'));
}
return Promise.resolve({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 });
}) as any);
await setupHostIptables('172.30.0.10', 3128, ['8.8.8.8', '8.8.4.4']);
// Verify sysctl was called to disable IPv6
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('sysctl', ['-w', 'net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1']);
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('sysctl', ['-w', 'net.ipv6.conf.default.disable_ipv6=1']);
});
it('should not disable IPv6 via sysctl when ip6tables is available', async () => {
mockedExeca
// Mock getNetworkBridgeName
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: 'fw-bridge', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
// Mock iptables -L DOCKER-USER (permission check)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
// Mock chain existence check (doesn't exist)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ exitCode: 1 } as any);
mockedExeca.mockResolvedValue({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any);
await setupHostIptables('172.30.0.10', 3128, ['8.8.8.8', '8.8.4.4']);
// Verify sysctl was NOT called to disable IPv6
expect(mockedExeca).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('sysctl', ['-w', 'net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1']);
expect(mockedExeca).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('sysctl', ['-w', 'net.ipv6.conf.default.disable_ipv6=1']);
});
});
describe('setupHostIptables with host access', () => {
it('should add gateway ACCEPT rules when hostAccess is enabled', async () => {
mockedExeca
// Mock getNetworkBridgeName
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: 'fw-bridge', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
// Mock iptables -L DOCKER-USER (permission check)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
// Mock chain existence check (doesn't exist)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ exitCode: 1 } as any);
// Default mock for all subsequent calls; getDockerBridgeGateway returns 172.17.0.1
mockedExeca.mockImplementation(((cmd: string, args: string[]) => {
if (cmd === 'docker' && args.includes('bridge')) {
return Promise.resolve({ stdout: '172.17.0.1', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 });
}
if (cmd === 'ip6tables') {
return Promise.resolve({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 });
}
return Promise.resolve({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 });
}) as any);
const hostAccess: HostAccessConfig = { enabled: true };
await setupHostIptables('172.30.0.10', 3128, ['8.8.8.8', '8.8.4.4'], undefined, undefined, hostAccess);
// Verify ACCEPT rules for Docker bridge gateway on default ports
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-p', 'tcp', '-d', '172.17.0.1', '--dport', '80',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-p', 'tcp', '-d', '172.17.0.1', '--dport', '443',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
// Verify ACCEPT rules for AWF network gateway (172.30.0.1) on default ports
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-p', 'tcp', '-d', '172.30.0.1', '--dport', '80',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-p', 'tcp', '-d', '172.30.0.1', '--dport', '443',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
});
it('should not add gateway rules when hostAccess is undefined', async () => {
mockedExeca
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: 'fw-bridge', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ exitCode: 1 } as any);
mockedExeca.mockResolvedValue({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any);
await setupHostIptables('172.30.0.10', 3128, ['8.8.8.8', '8.8.4.4']);
// Verify no gateway rules for 172.30.0.1 or 172.17.0.1
expect(mockedExeca).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', expect.arrayContaining([
'-d', '172.30.0.1', '--dport', '80',
]));
expect(mockedExeca).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', expect.arrayContaining([
'-d', '172.17.0.1',
]));
});
it('should add custom port rules when allowHostPorts is specified', async () => {
mockedExeca
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: 'fw-bridge', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ exitCode: 1 } as any);
mockedExeca.mockImplementation(((cmd: string, args: string[]) => {
if (cmd === 'docker' && args.includes('bridge')) {
return Promise.resolve({ stdout: '172.17.0.1', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 });
}
return Promise.resolve({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 });
}) as any);
const hostAccess: HostAccessConfig = { enabled: true, allowHostPorts: '3000,8080' };
await setupHostIptables('172.30.0.10', 3128, ['8.8.8.8', '8.8.4.4'], undefined, undefined, hostAccess);
// Verify custom port rules for Docker bridge gateway
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-p', 'tcp', '-d', '172.17.0.1', '--dport', '3000',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-p', 'tcp', '-d', '172.17.0.1', '--dport', '8080',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
// Verify custom port rules for AWF network gateway
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-p', 'tcp', '-d', '172.30.0.1', '--dport', '3000',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-p', 'tcp', '-d', '172.30.0.1', '--dport', '8080',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
});
it('should only use AWF gateway when Docker bridge gateway is null', async () => {
mockedExeca
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: 'fw-bridge', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ exitCode: 1 } as any);
mockedExeca.mockImplementation(((cmd: string, args: string[]) => {
// Make getDockerBridgeGateway return null (docker network inspect bridge fails)
if (cmd === 'docker' && args.includes('bridge')) {
return Promise.reject(new Error('network bridge not found'));
}
return Promise.resolve({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 });
}) as any);
const hostAccess: HostAccessConfig = { enabled: true };
await setupHostIptables('172.30.0.10', 3128, ['8.8.8.8', '8.8.4.4'], undefined, undefined, hostAccess);
// Verify rules for AWF network gateway (172.30.0.1)
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-p', 'tcp', '-d', '172.30.0.1', '--dport', '80',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
// Verify NO rules for Docker bridge gateway (172.17.0.1)
expect(mockedExeca).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-p', 'tcp', '-d', '172.17.0.1', '--dport', '80',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
});
it('should only add default ports when allowHostPorts is empty', async () => {
mockedExeca
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: 'fw-bridge', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ exitCode: 1 } as any);
mockedExeca.mockImplementation(((cmd: string, args: string[]) => {
if (cmd === 'docker' && args.includes('bridge')) {
return Promise.resolve({ stdout: '172.17.0.1', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 });
}
return Promise.resolve({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 });
}) as any);
const hostAccess: HostAccessConfig = { enabled: true, allowHostPorts: '' };
await setupHostIptables('172.30.0.10', 3128, ['8.8.8.8', '8.8.4.4'], undefined, undefined, hostAccess);
// Verify default port 80 rules exist
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-p', 'tcp', '-d', '172.30.0.1', '--dport', '80',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-p', 'tcp', '-d', '172.30.0.1', '--dport', '443',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
});
it('should support port ranges in allowHostPorts', async () => {
mockedExeca
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: 'fw-bridge', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ exitCode: 1 } as any);
mockedExeca.mockImplementation(((cmd: string, args: string[]) => {
if (cmd === 'docker' && args.includes('bridge')) {
return Promise.resolve({ stdout: '172.17.0.1', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 });
}
return Promise.resolve({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 });
}) as any);
const hostAccess: HostAccessConfig = { enabled: true, allowHostPorts: '3000-3010' };
await setupHostIptables('172.30.0.10', 3128, ['8.8.8.8', '8.8.4.4'], undefined, undefined, hostAccess);
// Verify port range rule
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-p', 'tcp', '-d', '172.30.0.1', '--dport', '3000-3010',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-p', 'tcp', '-d', '172.17.0.1', '--dport', '3000-3010',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
});
it('should skip invalid ports in allowHostPorts', async () => {
mockedExeca
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: 'fw-bridge', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ exitCode: 1 } as any);
mockedExeca.mockImplementation(((cmd: string, args: string[]) => {
if (cmd === 'docker' && args.includes('bridge')) {
return Promise.resolve({ stdout: '172.17.0.1', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 });
}
return Promise.resolve({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 });
}) as any);
const hostAccess: HostAccessConfig = { enabled: true, allowHostPorts: 'abc,99999,-1' };
await setupHostIptables('172.30.0.10', 3128, ['8.8.8.8', '8.8.4.4'], undefined, undefined, hostAccess);
// Verify invalid ports are NOT added - only default ports (80, 443) should exist
expect(mockedExeca).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', expect.arrayContaining([
'--dport', 'abc',
]));
expect(mockedExeca).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', expect.arrayContaining([
'--dport', '99999',
]));
expect(mockedExeca).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', expect.arrayContaining([
'--dport', '-1',
]));
// Default ports should still be present
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-p', 'tcp', '-d', '172.30.0.1', '--dport', '80',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-p', 'tcp', '-d', '172.30.0.1', '--dport', '443',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
});
it('should deduplicate ports when custom ports overlap with defaults', async () => {
mockedExeca
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: 'fw-bridge', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ exitCode: 1 } as any);
mockedExeca.mockImplementation(((cmd: string, args: string[]) => {
if (cmd === 'docker' && args.includes('bridge')) {
return Promise.resolve({ stdout: '172.17.0.1', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 });
}
return Promise.resolve({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 });
}) as any);
// Pass 80 and 443 as custom ports (duplicates of defaults) plus 3000
const hostAccess: HostAccessConfig = { enabled: true, allowHostPorts: '80,443,3000' };
await setupHostIptables('172.30.0.10', 3128, ['8.8.8.8', '8.8.4.4'], undefined, undefined, hostAccess);
// Count how many times port 80 rule was called for 172.30.0.1
const port80Calls = mockedExeca.mock.calls.filter(
(call) => call[0] === 'iptables' &&
Array.isArray(call[1]) &&
call[1].includes('--dport') &&
call[1][call[1].indexOf('--dport') + 1] === '80' &&
call[1].includes('-d') &&
call[1][call[1].indexOf('-d') + 1] === '172.30.0.1'
);
// Should only be called once (deduplicated)
expect(port80Calls).toHaveLength(1);
// Verify port 3000 also got a rule
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-p', 'tcp', '-d', '172.30.0.1', '--dport', '3000',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
});
it('should add service port rules when allowHostServicePorts is specified', async () => {
mockedExeca
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: 'fw-bridge', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ exitCode: 1 } as any);
mockedExeca.mockImplementation(((cmd: string, args: string[]) => {
if (cmd === 'docker' && args.includes('bridge')) {
return Promise.resolve({ stdout: '172.17.0.1', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 });
}
return Promise.resolve({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 });
}) as any);
const hostAccess: HostAccessConfig = { enabled: true, allowHostServicePorts: '5432,6379' };
await setupHostIptables('172.30.0.10', 3128, ['8.8.8.8', '8.8.4.4'], undefined, undefined, hostAccess);
// Verify service ports get ACCEPT rules on both gateway IPs
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-p', 'tcp', '-d', '172.30.0.1', '--dport', '5432',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-p', 'tcp', '-d', '172.30.0.1', '--dport', '6379',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-p', 'tcp', '-d', '172.17.0.1', '--dport', '5432',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-p', 'tcp', '-d', '172.17.0.1', '--dport', '6379',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
});
it('should deduplicate service ports with regular host ports', async () => {
mockedExeca
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: 'fw-bridge', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ exitCode: 1 } as any);
mockedExeca.mockImplementation(((cmd: string, args: string[]) => {
if (cmd === 'docker' && args.includes('bridge')) {
return Promise.resolve({ stdout: '172.17.0.1', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 });
}
return Promise.resolve({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 });
}) as any);
// Both allowHostPorts and allowHostServicePorts include 5432
const hostAccess: HostAccessConfig = {
enabled: true,
allowHostPorts: '5432,3000',
allowHostServicePorts: '5432,6379',
};
await setupHostIptables('172.30.0.10', 3128, ['8.8.8.8', '8.8.4.4'], undefined, undefined, hostAccess);
// Count how many times port 5432 rule was called for 172.30.0.1
const port5432Calls = mockedExeca.mock.calls.filter(
(call) => call[0] === 'iptables' &&
Array.isArray(call[1]) &&
call[1].includes('--dport') &&
call[1][call[1].indexOf('--dport') + 1] === '5432' &&
call[1].includes('-d') &&
call[1][call[1].indexOf('-d') + 1] === '172.30.0.1'
);
// Should only be called once (deduplicated)
expect(port5432Calls).toHaveLength(1);
// Verify 6379 also got a rule
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', [
'-t', 'filter', '-A', 'FW_WRAPPER',
'-p', 'tcp', '-d', '172.30.0.1', '--dport', '6379',
'-j', 'ACCEPT',
]);
});
});
describe('isValidPortSpec', () => {
it('should accept valid single ports', () => {
expect(isValidPortSpec('1')).toBe(true);
expect(isValidPortSpec('80')).toBe(true);
expect(isValidPortSpec('443')).toBe(true);
expect(isValidPortSpec('65535')).toBe(true);
});
it('should accept valid port ranges', () => {
expect(isValidPortSpec('3000-3010')).toBe(true);
expect(isValidPortSpec('1-65535')).toBe(true);
expect(isValidPortSpec('80-80')).toBe(true);
});
it('should reject invalid port specs', () => {
expect(isValidPortSpec('abc')).toBe(false);
expect(isValidPortSpec('0')).toBe(false);
expect(isValidPortSpec('65536')).toBe(false);
expect(isValidPortSpec('-1')).toBe(false);
expect(isValidPortSpec('99999')).toBe(false);
expect(isValidPortSpec('3010-3000')).toBe(false); // reversed range
expect(isValidPortSpec('')).toBe(false);
expect(isValidPortSpec('080-090')).toBe(false); // leading zeros in range
expect(isValidPortSpec('01-100')).toBe(false); // leading zero in start
expect(isValidPortSpec('1-0100')).toBe(false); // leading zero in end
});
});
describe('cleanupHostIptables', () => {
it('should flush and delete both FW_WRAPPER and FW_WRAPPER_V6 chains', async () => {
mockedExeca.mockResolvedValue({
stdout: '',
stderr: '',
exitCode: 0,
} as any);
await cleanupHostIptables();
// Verify IPv4 chain cleanup operations
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', ['-t', 'filter', '-F', 'FW_WRAPPER'], { reject: false });
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('iptables', ['-t', 'filter', '-X', 'FW_WRAPPER'], { reject: false });
// Verify IPv6 chain cleanup operations
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('ip6tables', ['-t', 'filter', '-F', 'FW_WRAPPER_V6'], { reject: false });
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('ip6tables', ['-t', 'filter', '-X', 'FW_WRAPPER_V6'], { reject: false });
});
it('should re-enable IPv6 via sysctl on cleanup if it was disabled', async () => {
// First, simulate setup that disabled IPv6
mockedExeca
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: 'fw-bridge', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 } as any)
.mockResolvedValueOnce({ exitCode: 1 } as any);
// Make ip6tables unavailable to trigger sysctl disable
mockedExeca.mockImplementation(((cmd: string) => {
if (cmd === 'ip6tables') {
return Promise.reject(new Error('ip6tables not found'));
}
return Promise.resolve({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 });
}) as any);
await setupHostIptables('172.30.0.10', 3128, ['8.8.8.8', '8.8.4.4']);
// Now run cleanup
jest.clearAllMocks();
mockedExeca.mockImplementation(((cmd: string) => {
if (cmd === 'ip6tables') {
return Promise.reject(new Error('ip6tables not found'));
}
return Promise.resolve({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 });
}) as any);
await cleanupHostIptables();
// Verify IPv6 was re-enabled via sysctl
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('sysctl', ['-w', 'net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=0']);
expect(mockedExeca).toHaveBeenCalledWith('sysctl', ['-w', 'net.ipv6.conf.default.disable_ipv6=0']);
});
it('should clean up IPv6 rules from DOCKER-USER when ip6tables is available', async () => {
// Mock all calls to succeed (ip6tables available)
mockedExeca.mockImplementation(((cmd: string, args: string[]) => {
// getNetworkBridgeName
if (cmd === 'docker' && args[0] === 'network') {
return Promise.resolve({ stdout: 'fw-bridge', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 });
}
// ip6tables -L -n (availability check)
if (cmd === 'ip6tables' && args.includes('-L') && args.includes('-n') && !args.includes('--line-numbers')) {
return Promise.resolve({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 });
}
// ip6tables DOCKER-USER listing with FW_WRAPPER_V6 reference
if (cmd === 'ip6tables' && args.includes('DOCKER-USER') && args.includes('--line-numbers')) {
return Promise.resolve({ stdout: '1 FW_WRAPPER_V6 all -- * * ::/0 ::/0\n', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 });
}
// iptables DOCKER-USER listing with FW_WRAPPER reference
if (cmd === 'iptables' && args.includes('DOCKER-USER') && args.includes('--line-numbers')) {
return Promise.resolve({ stdout: '1 FW_WRAPPER all -- -i fw-bridge -o fw-bridge 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0\n', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 });
}
return Promise.resolve({ stdout: '', stderr: '', exitCode: 0 });
}) as any);
await cleanupHostIptables();
// Verify IPv6 chain was flushed and deleted