docs: explain why agent_storage needs objectAdmin#41
Merged
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Ona <no-reply@ona.com>
easyCZ
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 21, 2026
docs: explain why agent_storage needs objectAdmin
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds an inline comment explaining why
objectAdminis required on theagent_storagebucket — the runner deletes conversation, blob, and result objects during agent execution cleanup, andobjectUserlacksstorage.objects.delete.Matches the comment pattern already used on
runner_runner_assets_access.Context: #39