Command format for adding a module can be improved

[goatygoatygoat]

The command format for adding a module can be improved according to your notes on command format part of the User Guide. Perhaps addm m/MODULE_CODE p/PLAN_NUMBER s/SEM_NUMBER [g/GRADE] would be more standardised. You can then proceed to explain that modules can be added with and without a grade attached.

[nus-pe-bot]

Team's Response

No response provided.

The 'Original' Bug

[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]

add/delete in UG

Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.

---

As attached below, it was stated that a user can also add a module, but the suggestion was to see add/delete which are not the correct command to perform this action. It should have been addm/deletem

---

_{[original: nus-cs2103-AY2021S2/pe-interim#1542] [original labels: severity.Low type.DocumentationBug]}

Their Response to the 'Original' Bug

[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]

Accepted.

Items for the Tester to Verify

❓ Issue duplicate status

Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)

• I disagree

Reason for disagreement: I do not think this is a duplicate issue as the original bug was that the reference to the add module command for the tip in viewing module was written wrongly. This which has nothing to do with the bug I made which was suggesting the format for the command of adding a module can be improved according to your notes about command format.

---