Skip to content

go1.24.2 #289

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 7, 2025
Merged

go1.24.2 #289

merged 3 commits into from
May 7, 2025

Conversation

derekparker
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@derekparker
Copy link
Contributor Author

Note to reviewers: This is a large change set, however the main thing to review is the new singular fips.patch file in the patches directory.

@derekparker derekparker requested review from dbenoit17 and ueno April 25, 2025 19:01
@WarheadsSE WarheadsSE mentioned this pull request Apr 29, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@ueno ueno left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I only went through the fips.patch (it's still large though), but couldn't spot any issues. LGTM.

func TestNewPrivateKey(t *testing.T) {
+ // Skip on RHEL 8
+ if b, err := os.ReadFile("/etc/os-release"); err == nil {
+ if strings.Contains(string(b), "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8") {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can't this be checked against openssl version (through openssl.VersionText())?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, if this approach proves problematic we can always do that.

@derekparker derekparker merged commit 5930e86 into golang-fips:main May 7, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed
@derekparker derekparker deleted the go1.24 branch May 7, 2025 17:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants