Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 11, 2025. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 11, 2025. It is now read-only.

Ranking method inconsistency between duplicated projects #14

@max-markov

Description

@max-markov

Hello,

In the WANN source, it seems you are ranking the individuals as described in the paper: by mean fitness + num connections (80%), or by peak fitness + num connections (20%).

In the prettyNeatWann source, however, you are sorting based only on mean fitness (80%) or by mean fitness + num connections (20%).

Is there a reason why this is different between the sources? And in general, what is the motivation of the separation between the WANN and prettyNeatWann sources? Couldn't fully understand this from the Readme description.

Thank you!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions