Our PR backlog is continuously growing and we're losing the focus.
The proposal is to speed-up the code review for the ready-for-review PRs.
The PR is considered ready-to review if:
- It is not stale.
- The tests are passing and there are no merge conflicts.
- The author wasn't recently asked to do changes.
Additionally we want to:
- Make sure all the non-draft PRs have at least 1 assigned reviewer from the core team.
Github is not storing artefacts for the 90 days old events. This is the reason we mark everything older that 90 days stale.
Our PR backlog is continuously growing and we're losing the focus.
The proposal is to speed-up the code review for the ready-for-review PRs.
The PR is considered ready-to review if:
Additionally we want to:
Github is not storing artefacts for the 90 days old events. This is the reason we mark everything older that 90 days
stale.