Feedback: Gemini's "Search Crawler" logic is misleading Go language learners #3550
Description
Dear Gemini Team / Google Engineers,
I am a veteran webmaster from China, nearly 40 years old, currently self-studying the Go programming language using Gemini. I’ve even managed to push my first project, SyncGet-Tiny, to GitHub thanks to this journey.
However, I’m writing because I’m concerned. Gemini is increasingly behaving like a "High-level Search Crawler" rather than a true AI collaborator. Here is the raw feedback from a "student" in the trenches:
Stop serving "Expired Food": My queries about Go 1.2x often return documentation from 3 years ago. If I wanted outdated search results, I would use a standard search engine. I need AI to reason, not just scrape.
Over-prompting is a distraction: When I am focused on logic point 'A', Gemini repeatedly suggests points 'B' and 'C'. This "forced guidance" disrupts the learning flow. A real partner listens first and suggests only when asked.
Lack of Logical Filtering: It feels like the AI is just re-arranging big data without understanding the intent. We need less "copy-paste" and more "logical reasoning."
I am sending this via my private mail server because I value this tool and want it to be better—less like a bot, more like a peer.
An "Old-school" Webmaster & Go LearnerMy Project: https://github.com/SyncGetBin/SyncGet-Tiny