I suggest adding a dedicated sort field​ (e.g., sort_order). Currently, records are sorted by ID

[feifannw]

"I suggest adding a dedicated sort field​ (e.g., sort_order). Currently, records are sorted by ID, which causes issues when business logic requires a custom sequence. For example, if the initial entry order is A, B, C, D, but later needs to be rearranged to A, D, C, B, the frontend might display correctly after re-sorting, but exported files like PDFs still follow the default ID ordering (resulting in ABCD). Adding this field will allow us to persist and respect the intended order across all outputs."

以下是对应中文。
英文是机器翻译。
关于增加一个字段的建议。建议增加一个用于排序的字段。因为录入的时候A、B、C、D。然后过了段时间发现顺序不对。应该是A、D、C、B。在程序处重新排序时。程序里面显示是正常的。但是生成的PDF或者其它都是引用ID排序。还是会排成ABCD。帮忙把以上文件翻译成英文，程序员类

[iand]

A workaround could be to edit the IDs of the objects that you need to be in a specific order.

[feifannw]

"Update the handlevalue within person, along with json_dataand gramps_id."

[feifannw]

ok?

[feifannw]

The generated PDF should be sorted by handle?