Skip to content

Faster attention calculation in 4-2.Seq2Seq? #75

Description

@shouldsee

Thanks for sharing! Just found out Attention.get_att_weight is calculating attention in a for-loop? this looks rather slow isn't it?

4-2.Seq2Seq(Attention)/Seq2Seq(Attention).ipynb

    def get_att_weight(self, dec_output, enc_outputs):  # get attention weight one 'dec_output' with 'enc_outputs'
        n_step = len(enc_outputs)
        attn_scores = torch.zeros(n_step)  # attn_scores : [n_step]

        for i in range(n_step):
            attn_scores[i] = self.get_att_score(dec_output, enc_outputs[i])

        # Normalize scores to weights in range 0 to 1
        return F.softmax(attn_scores).view(1, 1, -1)

    def get_att_score(self, dec_output, enc_output):  # enc_outputs [batch_size, num_directions(=1) * n_hidden]
        score = self.attn(enc_output)  # score : [batch_size, n_hidden]
        return torch.dot(dec_output.view(-1), score.view(-1))  # inner product make scalar value

Suggested parallel version

    def get_att_weight(self, dec_output, enc_outputs):  # get attention weight one 'dec_output' with 'enc_outputs'
        n_step = len(enc_outputs)
        attn_scores = torch.zeros(n_step,device=self.device)  # attn_scores : [n_step]

        enc_t = self.attn(enc_outputs)
        score = dec_output.transpose(1,0).bmm(enc_t.transpose(1,0).transpose(2,1))
        out1   = score.softmax(-1)
        return out1

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions