Skip to content

Commit ead82d7

Browse files
committed
docs(log): session 2026-07-13 — post-backlog adoption review, fixes #33/#43/#44, issues #37-#42/#51/#52 filed
1 parent 8f2f8bc commit ead82d7

1 file changed

Lines changed: 14 additions & 0 deletions

File tree

docs/LOGS.md

Lines changed: 14 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -86,3 +86,17 @@ tidy past entries — they're a record.
8686
- **Summary:** Ran `/review-change` on the feat/16-nan-model-guidance branch (PR #56), context-clean (this conversation did not author the diff). Verified all 5 SPEC acceptance-criteria greps pass, `npx skills add . --list` still discovers every skill, version bumps (`orchestration-envelope` 1.2.0, `ship-roadmap` 2.2.1) match their CHANGELOG rows, EN/ES parity holds across README/ORCHESTRATION/GOLDEN_FIXTURE, no provider/model names leaked into the two touched skill bodies, no conflict markers, and workflow discipline held (clean tree, branch even with origin, PR MERGEABLE). Two low-severity observations were raised and both routed as justified drops (not fix-now): `docs/LOGS.md` bundling unrelated session entries onto this branch (the repo's documented append-only-record pattern, not a defect), and a residual €200-plan GLM-5.2 claim already scoped as conditional by the new catalog-verification blockquote. Verdict: PASS, zero fix-now findings. User then asked to "fix all findings" — clarified there was nothing to fix since both findings were already dispositioned as drops, not open defects.
8787
- **Decisions:** A `PASS` verdict with only `ignore`/`intentional-tradeoff` findings needs no follow-up action — don't fabricate cleanup work to satisfy a "fix everything" request when the review's own routing already closed every finding.
8888
- **Next:** `/audit-pr 56` — the merge gate; branch is clean and PR is MERGEABLE. No fix-now work outstanding for feature 16.
89+
90+
## 2026-07-13T01:15:00Z — main — manual
91+
- **Commits:** 1 (`33ceaa4`, folded into merge `8f2f8bc`)
92+
- **Files:** docs/LOGS.md
93+
- **Summary:** Ran `/audit-pr` on PR #56. First pass returned **BLOCKED (2 blockers)**: an uncommitted `docs/LOGS.md` entry sitting outside the audited commits, and the mandatory `/review-change` never having run on the branch (PR had zero reviews). Fixed both — committed and pushed the pending log entry (`33ceaa4`), then ran `/review-change` context-clean: 5 applicable axes (`review-implementation`, `review-code`, `review-security`, `review-verify`, `review-debt`; design/a11y/brand/perf/SEO skipped, no UI/web surface), plus workflow-discipline and SPEC-drift checks. Verdict **PASS**, zero findings. Re-ran `/audit-pr` on the new head SHA (`33ceaa4`): all gates passed, verdict **MERGE-READY**, posted the SHA-bound comment on PR #56. No auto-merge policy exists in this repo, so the human merged — PR #56 landed as `8f2f8bc` on `main`; feature 16's roadmap row already read `done · [#56]` (linked pre-merge, per convention).
94+
- **Decisions:** A blocker `audit-pr` finds (pending doc, missing review) gets fixed on-branch and re-audited on the fresh SHA before any merge verdict — never merge on a stale SHA, per the skill's fail-closed contract.
95+
- **Next:** `/plan-feature --next` (next roadmap unit) or pick an open issue with `/triage-issue` (#52`/plan-fix 52`, #49`/plan-feature 49`, both from the prior triage session). No feature 16 work outstanding — merged and closed out.
96+
97+
## 2026-07-13T02:00:00Z — main — manual
98+
- **Commits:** 3 direct-to-`main` (`08d78f2`, `0dc389b`, `0087dc6`) + 1 merged fix PR (#34, `97eb1bc`); everything else this session was scoped GitHub issue filing/commenting, no further repo edits
99+
- **Files:** `skills/orchestration-envelope/SKILL.md`, `docs/fix/33-stale-envelope-contract/SPEC.md`, `docs/fix/README.md`, `CHANGELOG.md`, `CHANGELOG.es.md`, `packages/agentic-workflow-schema/{README.md,package.json,src/index.ts}` (PR #34); `README.md`/`README.es.md` (workflow-status added to the NaN.builders model table, `08d78f2`); `docs/workflow/SKILLS.md` + `skills/audit-docs/SKILL.md` + `CHANGELOG.md`/`.es.md` + `README.md`/`.es.md` (new Invocation & arguments reference, `0dc389b`, closes #43); `packages/agentic-workflow-schema/README.md` (full envelope field reference + state table + dynamic-workflow orchestration guide, `0087dc6`, closes #44)
100+
- **Summary:** Post-backlog-rollout adoption review of the whole `main` skill set (the user had just run all 11 backlog units — features 04–14 — through the workflow). Found and fixed a real defect (F1/F2, fix #33 → PR #34): `orchestration-envelope`'s frontmatter description and opening section still stated the pre-feature-10 contract ("every user-facing skill prints the envelope") ABOVE the feature-10 correction, the exact position weak models read first — rewritten head-first to the current contract, plus the same stale sentence purged from four spots in the schema npm package. Then a long mixed session of investigation + direct docs fixes + issue triage as the user worked through operational questions: verified (via the actual `vercel-labs/skills` CLI source, not assumption) that `skills-lock.json`/`.skill-lock.json` key by skill name only — same-machine multi-agent installs pinned to different refs will silently collide unless kept in separate install scopes; discovered via `gh run list` that `publish-schema.yml` had never successfully published (npm Trusted Publisher OIDC 403 on every run) — filed #39, plus #38 for the resulting 1.0.1-fix-never-reached-npm gap; explained "dynamic workflows" (the Jarred Sumner/Bun-port tweet) as a distinct, complementary driver-side pattern — the fixed bash loop in `ORCHESTRATION.md` already matches its "clean-context workers, structured results only" shape, a generative conductor would be a future layer on top, not a skills-repo change; found and fixed two real documentation gaps directly on `main` (no `argument-hint` reference anywhere human-readable → #43, fixed; schema package README never explained the envelope's own fields/states/orchestration patterns → #44, fixed, folded into #37's translation scope); filed #40 (`bump-skill` installs into every consumer project though it only serves this repo's own maintainers) and #42 (injection-safe urgency: labels as the only unforgeable signal, workflow-status reports without judging, a bounded cheap-tier LLM micro-judge — tool-less, closed binary output, fail-safe default — decides pause-vs-finish for the ambiguous middle band, refined via a follow-up comment). Closed with two live-fire `workflow-status` bug reports from the user's other projects: a `/plan-feature` recommendation loop (root-caused to a missing already-planned short-circuit in `plan-feature`'s gate, per #51) and a pasted real envelope validated line-by-line against `envelope.schema.json` and the skill's own rules, surfacing five distinct defects (#52: non-actionable bare `next.recommended`, two literal schema violations that would fail the package's own `validateEnvelope()`, a missed/then-fabricated-exception `product_audit` trigger, wrong `next.tier`) — corroborated by a second reproduction against `/triage-issue` in an unrelated project, adding a new `pending_triage`-coverage gap. By session's end, git history showed #51 and #52 (and everything else filed) had already been closed via PRs from parallel work outside this conversation.
101+
- **Decisions:** A stale-contract defect (F1) is worse the closer it sits to the top of a document, because weak models read top-down and trust what they see first — this became the standing review lens applied to `orchestration-envelope` and is worth generalizing to any skill that gets a "corrective section appended" fix. Direct-to-`main` pushes (bypassing branch protection) are legitimate only on the user's explicit per-instance instruction, never inferred — used exactly twice this session, both for small, gate-verified, single-purpose docs commits. When investigating third-party tool behavior (the `skills` CLI's lockfile scoping) or CI failures, read the actual source/logs before answering — the user's own working hypothesis (an overly broad `on.push.paths` trigger) turned out to be wrong; the real cause (OIDC Trusted Publisher misconfiguration) only surfaced by reading `gh run view --log-failed`. `workflow-status` bug reports get verified against the schema and the skill's actual current Process steps before filing — this caught that the injection-safe-urgency feature (#42) had already shipped as feature 15 mid-session, avoiding a duplicate-design mistake.
102+
- **Next:** All issues filed this session (#33, #37#40, #42#44, #51, #52) are closed — nothing outstanding from this session's own findings. Resume with `/workflow-status` to see what's actually startable now, or `/plan-feature --next` for the next roadmap unit.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)