Skip to content

PAPER_PLAN_TEMPLATE.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
53 lines (41 loc) · 2.84 KB

PAPER_PLAN_TEMPLATE.md

File metadata and controls

53 lines (41 loc) · 2.84 KB
Raw

Paper Plan

Template for Workflow 3 — skip planning phase. Fill in, then run /paper-writing "PAPER_PLAN.md". An existing plan may skip Phase 1 only after it satisfies the canonical Claim Ledger, Front-Matter Coverage Index, and Figure/Table Layout Contract below. Migrate a legacy plan into these contracts before treating it as complete.

Metadata

  • Title: [Title]
  • Venue: [ICLR / NeurIPS / ICML]
  • One-sentence contribution: [Core takeaway]

Canonical Claim Ledger

Claim ID Role Exact claim Comparator or N/A Evidence (experiment/table/figure/theorem/proof) Scope/data access Selection/training/adaptation or N/A Limitation Forbidden expansion
C1 [primary] [Exact sentence-level claim] [Comparator or N/A] [semantic figure/table label, result file, or analysis] [dataset, split, population, and what data the method may access] [what is trained, development-selected, calibrated, adapted, or N/A] [boundary of the supported claim] [stronger wording that the evidence does not support]
C2 [supporting] [Exact sentence-level claim] [Comparator or N/A] [semantic evidence link] [scope and data-access boundary] [selection/training/adaptation boundary or N/A] [known limitation] [forbidden extrapolation]

Front-Matter Coverage Index

Claim ID Abstract move Intro bullet Body subsection Evidence location Conclusion sentence
C1 [problem/method/evidence/takeaway] [bullet number] [section/subsection] [tab:primary or fig:overview] [mirrored, scope-aware sentence]
C2 [move or N/A] [bullet number] [section/subsection] [semantic evidence label] [mirrored sentence or N/A]

Section Plan

1. Introduction (~1.5 pages)

  • What: [contribution]
  • Why: [importance]
  • How: [approach]
  • Result: [strongest number]

2. Related Work (~1 page)

  • [Group 1]: [papers, gap]
  • [Group 2]: [papers, gap]

3. Method (~2 pages)

  • [Problem formulation]
  • [Proposed approach]

4. Experiments (~3 pages)

  • [Setup, main results, ablation]

5. Conclusion (~0.5 pages)

  • [Summary, limitations, future]

Figure/Table Layout Contract

Label Kind Width class Preferred placement Must preserve Caption budget Priority
fig:overview figure* double column near first method discussion [module order and readable labels at final size] 2–3 lines primary
fig:main_results figure single column near the claim it supports [metric direction, uncertainty, and comparator identity] 1–2 lines secondary
tab:primary table single column before secondary diagnostics [metric, protocol, grouping, units, and tie-aware emphasis] 1–2 lines primary

Key References

  1. [Author et al., "Title", Venue Year]
  2. [...]