Skip to content

Commit e9e520d

Browse files
committed
draft post
1 parent 08688aa commit e9e520d

2 files changed

Lines changed: 55 additions & 4 deletions

File tree

.vscode/tasks.json

Lines changed: 17 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
1+
{
2+
// See https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=733558
3+
// for the documentation about the tasks.json format
4+
"version": "2.0.0",
5+
"tasks": [
6+
{
7+
"label": "preview",
8+
"type": "shell",
9+
"command": "./hugo.exe server --buildDrafts --buildFuture",
10+
"problemMatcher": [],
11+
"group": {
12+
"kind": "build",
13+
"isDefault": true
14+
}
15+
}
16+
]
17+
}

content/posts/2026/01/deprecation-and-migration/index.md

Lines changed: 38 additions & 4 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -17,15 +17,49 @@ I recently deprecated a beloved software feature.
1717

1818
The feature had been in service long before I was involved in the project and was serving a user base of over 10k.
1919
It functioned as smoothly as the day it was released; it was stable, (mostly) bug-free and performant.
20-
Now, most people would think, *"If it ain't broke, don't fix it"*.
20+
Now, most people would think, _"If it ain't broke, don't fix it"_.
2121

2222
Sadly, reality is different and things were more complicated.
2323

2424
Under the hood, the feature was tightly coupled with legacy APIs and outdated dependencies.
25-
Maintaining or extending it with new functionalities was difficult if not impossible.
25+
Maintaining or extending it with new functionalities was difficult if not impossible.
2626
Furthermore, the feature requires complex configuration which often confuses and frustrates new users.
2727

2828
Ultimately, I felt that it was a blocker to progress.
29-
The feature had served the project well, but it was time for it to go and make way a more modern and intuitive solution.
29+
The feature had served the project well, but it was time for it to go and make way for a more modern and intuitive solution.
3030

31-
## The Deprecation
31+
## The Deprecation Process
32+
33+
### Change Freeze
34+
35+
One of the early steps is to freeze changes on the feature to be deprecated.
36+
This is typically done by adding a `@deprecated` annotation to the feature.
37+
The deprecation signals the intent to remove the feature in a future release.
38+
This helps developers to avoid redundant Pull Request (PR) and also helps to direct development efforts to the new solution.
39+
40+
### Implement the New Solution
41+
42+
**Feature Parity.**
43+
**Backward Compatibility.**
44+
**Ease of Migration.**
45+
46+
### Communication
47+
48+
There are various aspects to consider when communicating the deprecation to users.
49+
50+
**Communication channels.** To ensure that the message reaches all the intended audiences, communication of the deprecation was done via the following channels:
51+
52+
- Log files: A warning is logged whenever the deprecated feature is used. Since log files are often monitored by system administrators, warning messages can be used to alert them.
53+
- Release notes: A <abbr title="Too Long; Didn't Read">TLDR</abbr> version of the deprecation message. Unfortunately most people don't read this or miss it especially when the release notes are long.
54+
- Project forums and social media: Besides functioning as a channel for deprecation announcements, it is also a good place for discussions and to get feedback.
55+
- Project repository and project management site: Intended for developers, the technical aspects of the deprecation are detailed here.
56+
- Project documentation site: The primary source of information for everyone.
57+
- Notifications: Send a notification when the deprecated feature is used.
58+
59+
**Communicating the Deprecation.** For the deprecation message to be effective, I included the following elements:
60+
61+
- Context: Provides a short summary or background about the feature.
62+
- Reason: Explains why the feature is being deprecated (for example, technical debt, compatibility with newer APIs, etc.).
63+
- Impact: Highlight the impact if the feature is not deprecated (for example, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, etc.).
64+
- Migration: Provide a migration plan to help users adopt the new solution. Provide examples and explain alternatives if available.
65+
- Time frame: Give a time frame to allow users to plan for the deprecation. Be as clear as possible such as providing the exact date or version where the feature will be removed.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)