Strict print width

[RunDevelopment]

Let me be the first one to start a discussion.

Right now, this plugin ignores the printWidth setting (explicitly specified by the user) in some situations. It does this because the end of paragraphs may be very short otherwise which isn't nice visually. See the full explanation with examples here.

The purpose of this discussion is to determine whether this plugin should be allowed to ignore the printWidth setting for a more visually pleasing result.

---

My opinion on the matter is simple: No, it should not ignore printWidth.

printWidth was explicitly set by the user. We can't just ignore that.

I would also argue that paragraphs that are randomly longer than the rest look a lot worse than paragraphs ending with a single word.

Details

(printWidth ignored)

(printWidth honored)

I would like to point out that the question of where to insert line breaks, is a problem that programs like MS Words, LibreOffice, and LaTeX renders also have to solve, but they can't print beyond the page. How do those programs solve this?

[hosseinmd]

Thank you for contribute.

[hosseinmd]

MS Office changing space between characters to justify content. I don't know it is possible for us.

[RunDevelopment]

IDE's typically use monospaced fonts, so this isn't possible.

[RunDevelopment]

I had an idea. Print width is ignored to prevent a situation where the last line of a paragraph contains just a single word or two. IMO, this isn't a problem, but how about we do this:

Instead of appending the last very short line to the one above (going beyond print width), how about we move a few words from the second last line down to the last line?

Example

(print width ignored)

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo 
ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis 
dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Donec quam felis, amet
ultricies nec, pellentesque eu, pretium quis, sem. Nulla consequat massa a enim.

(print width honored)

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo 
ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis 
dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Donec quam felis, amet
ultricies nec, pellentesque eu, pretium quis, sem. Nulla consequat massa 
a enim.

(new method)

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo 
ligula eget dolor. Aenean massa. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis 
dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Donec quam felis, amet
ultricies nec, pellentesque eu, pretium quis, sem. Nulla consequat
massa a enim.

How many characters/words of the second last line will be moved into the last one also has to be decided somehow.

[hosseinmd]

For example

/** Donec quam felis, amet ultricies nec, pellentesque eu, pretium quis, sem. Nulla. */

[RunDevelopment]

If it's too long, it will be split into two lines.

Example

(print width ignored)

/** Donec quam felis, amet ultricies nec, pellentesque eu, pretium quis, sem. Nulla. */

(print width honored)

/**
 * Donec quam felis, amet ultricies nec, pellentesque eu, pretium quis, sem. 
 * Nulla.
 */

(new method)

/**
 * Donec quam felis, amet ultricies nec, pellentesque eu, pretium quis, 
 * sem. Nulla.
 */

It really shouldn't matter that the comment could be a single line if only print width was a little more. We can't just ignore print width when it's convenient.

[hosseinmd]

Many developers like single comment, we should keep this feature.

[hosseinmd]

A word more not so matter when it is single line

[RunDevelopment]

I personally don't like that single-line comments go beyond. But, it would be acceptable if it was the only place where printWidth is ignored.

[vincerubinetti]

@RunDevelopment in case you haven't seen, there is more discussion of this issue in #168 . I'm glad I'm not the only one who's complaining about this "clever" wrapping behavior. Luckily though, it seems like a user is working on a PR that will allow us to specify a wrapping strategy, and wrapping "normally" as you describe should be one of the options.