|
| 1 | +PHASE-C2-CHARTER.md |
| 2 | +Project: XSTRP (XRP Safe Transfer & Recovery Protocol) |
| 3 | +Phase: C2 — Interface & Integration Planning |
| 4 | +1. Phase Status |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +Phase C2 is ACTIVE (Planning-Only) |
| 7 | +Phase C1 remains COMPLETE, FROZEN, and IMMUTABLE. |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +No Phase C1 artifacts may be modified, reinterpreted, or superseded. |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +2. Phase Purpose |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +The sole purpose of Phase C2 is to define safe, explicit extension boundaries around the frozen XSTRP core. |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +Phase C2 exists to answer how XSTRP could be connected to external systems without: |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +altering protocol logic, |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +weakening safety guarantees, or |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +introducing enforcement assumptions. |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +This phase prepares interfaces, not implementations. |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +3. Scope of Allowed Work |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +Phase C2 MAY include: |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +📄 Documentation |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +Interface descriptions |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +Integration scenarios (non-binding) |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +Architectural diagrams (non-normative) |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +🧩 Rust trait definitions only |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +No logic |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +No state mutation |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +No side effects |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +🧪 Compile-time checks |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +Trait bounds |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +Type-level constraints |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +📝 Threat-surface analysis for hypothetical integrations |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +All changes must be additive. |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +4. Explicit Non-Goals |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | +Phase C2 MUST NOT include: |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +❌ Any modification to RFC-XSTRP-0001 |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +❌ Any modification to Phase C1 Rust code |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | +❌ XRPL integration of any kind |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | +❌ Cryptographic primitives or signing |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | +❌ Networking, transport, or messaging layers |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | +❌ Persistence or storage implementations |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +❌ Enforcement of IntentBinding |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | +❌ Runtime logic, handlers, or adapters |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +❌ “Just a stub” implementations |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | +If logic executes, Phase C2 has been violated. |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +5. Interface Philosophy |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | +All Phase C2 interfaces must be: |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | +Purely declarative |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | +Opt-in |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | +Externally supplied |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | +Protocol-agnostic |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +Non-authoritative |
| 92 | + |
| 93 | +XSTRP core remains the only source of truth for intent state transitions. |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | +6. Safety Invariants (Inherited from Phase C1) |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | +Phase C2 must not introduce any mechanism that: |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | +Enables fund release without receiver participation |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | +Enables sender redirection after intent creation |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | +Allows third-party seizure or coercion |
| 104 | + |
| 105 | +Creates a stranded-fund state |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | +Weakens deterministic state transitions |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | +If an interface could violate these, it must be rejected or redesigned. |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | +7. Exit Criteria |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | +Phase C2 may be considered complete when: |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | +All intended interfaces are documented |
| 116 | + |
| 117 | +All Rust traits compile |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | +No runtime logic exists |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +No Phase C1 files were altered |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | +A new freeze declaration is written (PHASE-C2-FROZEN.md) |
| 124 | + |
| 125 | +8. Freeze Conditions |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | +Phase C2 MUST be frozen immediately if: |
| 128 | + |
| 129 | +Implementation pressure appears |
| 130 | + |
| 131 | +External systems begin dictating design |
| 132 | + |
| 133 | +Safety invariants are questioned |
| 134 | + |
| 135 | +Scope creep occurs |
| 136 | + |
| 137 | +The beginner-pace constraint is threatened |
| 138 | + |
| 139 | +Freeze is always preferred over progress. |
| 140 | + |
| 141 | +9. Developer Constraints (Still Enforced) |
| 142 | + |
| 143 | +Beginner pace |
| 144 | + |
| 145 | +Safety > features |
| 146 | + |
| 147 | +Additive changes only |
| 148 | + |
| 149 | +Explicit phase boundaries |
| 150 | + |
| 151 | +No silent scope creep |
| 152 | + |
| 153 | +No urgency bias |
| 154 | + |
| 155 | +10. Authority |
| 156 | + |
| 157 | +This charter governs all Phase C2 work. |
| 158 | +Any deviation requires an explicit, written amendment before action. |
| 159 | + |
| 160 | +Phase C2 Charter — Adopted |
| 161 | +Status: ACTIVE (Planning-Only) |
0 commit comments