Skip to content

Commit 69c2d1d

Browse files
Add Phase C2 charter (planning-only, no implementation)
1 parent a340e9c commit 69c2d1d

File tree

1 file changed

+161
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+161
-0
lines changed

PHASE-C2-CHARTER.md

Lines changed: 161 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
1+
PHASE-C2-CHARTER.md
2+
Project: XSTRP (XRP Safe Transfer & Recovery Protocol)
3+
Phase: C2 — Interface & Integration Planning
4+
1. Phase Status
5+
6+
Phase C2 is ACTIVE (Planning-Only)
7+
Phase C1 remains COMPLETE, FROZEN, and IMMUTABLE.
8+
9+
No Phase C1 artifacts may be modified, reinterpreted, or superseded.
10+
11+
2. Phase Purpose
12+
13+
The sole purpose of Phase C2 is to define safe, explicit extension boundaries around the frozen XSTRP core.
14+
15+
Phase C2 exists to answer how XSTRP could be connected to external systems without:
16+
17+
altering protocol logic,
18+
19+
weakening safety guarantees, or
20+
21+
introducing enforcement assumptions.
22+
23+
This phase prepares interfaces, not implementations.
24+
25+
3. Scope of Allowed Work
26+
27+
Phase C2 MAY include:
28+
29+
📄 Documentation
30+
31+
Interface descriptions
32+
33+
Integration scenarios (non-binding)
34+
35+
Architectural diagrams (non-normative)
36+
37+
🧩 Rust trait definitions only
38+
39+
No logic
40+
41+
No state mutation
42+
43+
No side effects
44+
45+
🧪 Compile-time checks
46+
47+
Trait bounds
48+
49+
Type-level constraints
50+
51+
📝 Threat-surface analysis for hypothetical integrations
52+
53+
All changes must be additive.
54+
55+
4. Explicit Non-Goals
56+
57+
Phase C2 MUST NOT include:
58+
59+
❌ Any modification to RFC-XSTRP-0001
60+
61+
❌ Any modification to Phase C1 Rust code
62+
63+
❌ XRPL integration of any kind
64+
65+
❌ Cryptographic primitives or signing
66+
67+
❌ Networking, transport, or messaging layers
68+
69+
❌ Persistence or storage implementations
70+
71+
❌ Enforcement of IntentBinding
72+
73+
❌ Runtime logic, handlers, or adapters
74+
75+
❌ “Just a stub” implementations
76+
77+
If logic executes, Phase C2 has been violated.
78+
79+
5. Interface Philosophy
80+
81+
All Phase C2 interfaces must be:
82+
83+
Purely declarative
84+
85+
Opt-in
86+
87+
Externally supplied
88+
89+
Protocol-agnostic
90+
91+
Non-authoritative
92+
93+
XSTRP core remains the only source of truth for intent state transitions.
94+
95+
6. Safety Invariants (Inherited from Phase C1)
96+
97+
Phase C2 must not introduce any mechanism that:
98+
99+
Enables fund release without receiver participation
100+
101+
Enables sender redirection after intent creation
102+
103+
Allows third-party seizure or coercion
104+
105+
Creates a stranded-fund state
106+
107+
Weakens deterministic state transitions
108+
109+
If an interface could violate these, it must be rejected or redesigned.
110+
111+
7. Exit Criteria
112+
113+
Phase C2 may be considered complete when:
114+
115+
All intended interfaces are documented
116+
117+
All Rust traits compile
118+
119+
No runtime logic exists
120+
121+
No Phase C1 files were altered
122+
123+
A new freeze declaration is written (PHASE-C2-FROZEN.md)
124+
125+
8. Freeze Conditions
126+
127+
Phase C2 MUST be frozen immediately if:
128+
129+
Implementation pressure appears
130+
131+
External systems begin dictating design
132+
133+
Safety invariants are questioned
134+
135+
Scope creep occurs
136+
137+
The beginner-pace constraint is threatened
138+
139+
Freeze is always preferred over progress.
140+
141+
9. Developer Constraints (Still Enforced)
142+
143+
Beginner pace
144+
145+
Safety > features
146+
147+
Additive changes only
148+
149+
Explicit phase boundaries
150+
151+
No silent scope creep
152+
153+
No urgency bias
154+
155+
10. Authority
156+
157+
This charter governs all Phase C2 work.
158+
Any deviation requires an explicit, written amendment before action.
159+
160+
Phase C2 Charter — Adopted
161+
Status: ACTIVE (Planning-Only)

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)