Overview over locally running test cases #717
Unanswered
bertrandkerres
asked this question in
Q&A - Software
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
Just saw that the documentation states the way to increase the number of workers. Being able to read is a clear advantage in life 😅 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Thanks @bertrandkerres for bringing this up. Indeed, you can scale the number of workers upon deployment. But your second point about providing a helpful response by the API to indicate there is a problem is a good one. I just made an issue about it here: #720. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi all 👋,
while updating my Julia package for BOPTEST v0.7.0, I ran into an issue when I wanted to started a second test locally. This doesn't seem possible with the default (i.e.
docker compose up web worker provision). But I had lost my local objects holding the first test's id, so I didn't know how to stop it through the API.I could reset the system through
docker compose down/docker compose up ..., but I'm thinking that many people could run into that issue now with the BOPTEST-Service running locally if they forget to stop their old test.Some unordered thoughts:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions