Skip to content

Commit 10995be

Browse files
authored
Clarification of this repo
1 parent c450c5b commit 10995be

File tree

1 file changed

+10
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+10
-1
lines changed

README.md

Lines changed: 10 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -73,10 +73,19 @@ I got extra quality boost, about 0.3 - 0,7 dB in PSNR evaluation of all images.
7373
2. The original `convert.py` uses `magick command` for resizing images. This repo uses `OpenCV` for resizing images.
7474

7575
### Why uses all training images?
76-
It mimics INRIA 3DGS which uses all images for training data
76+
It mimics INRIA 3DGS which uses all images for training data.
77+
78+
![image](https://github.com/ichsan2895/nerfstudio/assets/60387342/ec3afe28-429a-4816-a6fb-b1c3e864b471)
7779

7880
### Will it be overfitting?
7981
Yes, thats okay for me. Overfitting is not problem because we don't generate entirely new scene. But we must maximize the existing scene quality.
8082

8183
### How about quality?
8284
It increases from 28,7 dB to 29,2 dB PSNR (extra 0,5 dB) for `apartement eyeful tower 1k JPEGs` dataset. Another dataset is not yet tested. Hopefully in short of time.
85+
86+
### You can NOT compare the metrics since you have trained all images included eval images.
87+
Yes it will be biased since eval images already leaks into training dataset. But this repo is intended for END USER which does not care about PSNR, SSIM, etc. They care only the end product.
88+
89+
### Is it compatible with original Nerfstudio?
90+
If you resume the training from original nerfstudio's checkpoint = **No**, it will be error because different count of training dataset.
91+
If you training from `ns-process-data images/videos/odm/realitycapture/metashape` etc from original nerfstudio = **Yes**, it compatibles

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)