Memory issues with GrandPotentialPlanar example #28781
Unanswered
nwinner
asked this question in
Q&A Modules: Phase field
Replies: 2 comments 7 replies
-
|
Hello This runs fine on my machine. I dont run out of memory on a much smaller machine. It seems you use 32 processes. Can you try less? Maybe 8 like I did Guillaume |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
When I run the input file using 8 processes, it works. Doesn't this point to some sort of OOM error since we are reducing the memory required for each rank, or does SIG9 have some other meaning related to "over parallelizing"? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
7 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello all, I'm new to the MOOSE framework and I'm experimenting with examples for the phase field module to get a feel for things.
I took the GrandPotentialPlanar.i example, which runs fine, and made some modifications to try and match the parameters provided by in this paper. by Biswas et al.
I modify the input file to start to work towards the system provided in the paper. (I have questions about that too but I'll save that for another thread unless it comes up in the discussion.). When I modify the initial conditions and the material constants, I am able to get some cases where I get
EXIT CODE 9, signalling out-of-memory. This is very strange to me (1) that it is dependent on the input parameters I use, when the mesh doesn't change, and also (2) because the VectorMemoryUsage doesn't show very high memory usage:I am running this through docker moose:latest on a compute node with 720GB of RAM and 2TB of disk space. So there shouldn't be any issue unless I'm misundestanding something.
Input file:
GrandPotentialPlanar.txt
Output log:
output.log
Could I get some assistsance with understanding the problem?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions