Skip to content

Is it useful to specify specific RTCP feedback replacement with QUIC equivalents? #23

@SpencerDawkins

Description

@SpencerDawkins

As described in https://ietf-wg-avtcore.github.io/sdp-roq/draft-dawkins-avtcore-sdp-roq.html#name-specific-rtcp-feedback-repl

The API between QUIC and RoQ is, of course, a private matter, but the authors got feedback at the February 2025 AVTCORE interim meeting that it would be useful to "standardize", or at least provide guidance about, specific QUIC feedback substitutions so that each RoQ implementer doesn't have to perform this analysis from first principles.

  • We almost certainly need implementation and deployment experience before we can do more than offer a strawman proposal.

  • Spencer suggests that we include any IETF-recommended QUIC feedback substitutions in separate documents, as we do with RTCP extensions today, or even include them in the GitHub repository Wiki for this document, since these recommendations may change as the QUIC protocol evolves.

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

notnow"Not Now" - the issue is real, but the authors are deferring work on it for now.wg-discussWe need input from the working group to make a choice

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions