Skip to content

add vertical stretching #143

@pdziekan

Description

@pdziekan

questions to be resolved:

  1. with stretching, G in eq. (18) in the UWLCM paper (Dziekan et al. 2019 GMD) is no longer equal to rhod, so eq. (18) is no longer equal to eqs. (3)-(5) (taking into account the anelastic constraint). Would this affect forcings in some way?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions