You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
- * Anemia YLDs (per pregnancy and in rate space) remain higher than GBD
2964
+
* By severity, moderate anemia YLD rates are overestimated and severe anemia YLD rates are underestimated
2965
+
* GBD location aggregation for prevalence was done using total (not pregnant) population; all checks in this model and in 31.0s are using a re-aggregated prevalence
2966
+
* Significant difference between prevalence in the draws we selected and the full set of draws
2967
+
* Moderate anemia prevalence rates are systematically higher than GBD, and not much of this can be explained by location aggregation of hemoglobin exposure
2968
+
(presumed to be due to baseline IFA deletion, see 31.0s)
2969
+
* Severe anemia prevalence rates are systematically lower than GBD, but this is *more than* explained by location aggregation of hemoglobin exposure; accounting for that, they are overestimated
2970
+
(also presumed to be due to baseline IFA deletion, see 31.0s)
2971
+
* Disability weights by severity approximately match GBD, though we have not yet found a citation for these
- Confirm expected rates of cause-specific and overall maternal disorders causes
@@ -3024,13 +3037,11 @@ Default stratifications to all observers should include scenario and input draw.
3024
3037
- Including gestational age/birth weight exposures as well as neonatal mortality risk
3025
3038
- Engineers to update at their convenience
3026
3039
- TBD
3027
-
* - Effect of IFA on preterm birth appears to be overestimated and failure to calibrate to expected preterm birth prevalence and related measures in model 23.0
3028
-
- Thought to be due to the failure to account for the correlation between LBWSG exposure and ANC attendance in the calculation of the IFA and MMS gestational age shifts
3029
-
- Research to recalculate IFA and MMS gestational age shifts to account for correlation. See slack thread for additional details
3030
-
- TBD
3031
3040
* - Overestimating proportion of believed term given preterm fraction
3032
-
- Thought to be related to failure to account for additional correlation induced by the baseline IFA calibration with respect to gestational age
3033
-
- Wait and see if this is improved following resolution of above issue. If not, account for this and move facility choice model pipeline into the simulation repository to increase ease of future updates
3041
+
- Originally thought to be related to failure to account for additional correlation induced by the baseline IFA calibration with respect to gestational age,
3042
+
but this has not been resolved by model 30.0 updates to the oral iron GA shift implementation.
3043
+
New theory is that our calibration causes mean gestational age to match, but not the proportion of preterm.
3044
+
- `Research to investigate <https://jira.ihme.washington.edu/browse/SSCI-2614>`
3034
3045
- TBD
3035
3046
* - Early neonatal other causes mortality risk in Pakistan overestimated
3036
3047
- Unknown
@@ -3042,7 +3053,7 @@ Default stratifications to all observers should include scenario and input draw.
3042
3053
- TBD
3043
3054
* - There is zero coverage of "ACS availability" among stillbirths even though stillbirths should be eligible and covered by this intervention.
3044
3055
- Likely a result of there being null coverage for CPAP availability for stillbirths (because they are not alive to receive CPAP). However, stillbirths should receive ACS coverage if they are in the relevant believed gestational age range and delivering in a facility that has CPAP access.
3045
-
- Wait until we split stillbirths into antepartum and intrapartum before we address this issue, as only intrapartum stillbirths should receive ACS coverage
3056
+
- Wait until we split stillbirths into antepartum and intrapartum before we address this issue, as only intrapartum stillbirths should receive ACS coverage (?)
3046
3057
- TBD
3047
3058
* - `Ferritin exposure model needs updating <https://jira.ihme.washington.edu/browse/SSCI-2439>`__
3048
3059
- Ali's documentation issue resulted in known issues with ferritin data used for implementation of anemia screening model
@@ -3078,36 +3089,25 @@ Default stratifications to all observers should include scenario and input draw.
3078
3089
Note that the LNN limitation stacks with the previous limitation for preterm birth with RDS to result in
3079
3090
a nearly 3% underestimate in that LNN CSMRisk.
3080
3091
- N/A
3081
-
* - In GBD data for Pakistan (for both GBD 2021 and 2023 rounds) the values for incidence, prevalence, and YLDs of rectovaginal fistula (s_189) and vesicovaginal fistula (s_190) sequelae of the maternal obstructed labor and uterine rupture cause (c_370) are zero, causing unexpectedly low YLDs for the obstructed labor and uterine rupture cause (~10 times fewer YLDs than India despite incidence being only about twice as low)
3082
-
- Issue with GBD fistula model in which Pakistan burden was erroneously set to zero
3083
-
- `Update model in accordance with this PR <https://github.com/ihmeuw/vivarium_research/pull/1847>`__
3084
-
- "Pakistan fistula update" model run
3085
3092
* - In GBD 2023 data for Pakistan the mortality values for the abortion and miscarriage cause (c_995) are very small (nearly the lowest of any national location globally),
3086
3093
causing unexpectedly low YLLs (~100 times fewer than India)
3087
3094
- Possible issue with ST-GPR model reacting to an all-zero datapoint added in GBD 2023 for Pakistan
3088
3095
- Determine cause of issue with GBD modeling team, decide whether to leave as-is or use a proxy location
3089
3096
- TBD
3090
-
* - Hemoglobin screening coverage inverted (again) after model 24
3091
-
- Due to incorrect merge conflict resolution `here <https://github.com/ihmeuw/vivarium_gates_mncnh/commit/5ec7be1d7b924c8e21429c986f200926fce1f1e8#diff-00be43841d2d3685affadba19259e1c7e06db62ed24e32adbf9d06391483da24>`__.
means stillbirths have the cat2 and cat8 columns, which are NaN, and those NaNs get propagated through the cumsum operation leading to weirdness
3097
-
- Engineering to fix
3098
-
- GA floor fixes 2
3099
-
* - Hemoglobin exposure in the state table is null until the later pregnancy intervention timestep
3100
-
- Arose starting in model 27.0
3101
-
- Engineering to fix
3102
-
- IV iron neonatal effects bugfixes
3103
-
* - IV iron effects based on hemoglobin exposure based on the later pregnancy ANC visit rather than the first trimester ANC visit as intended
3104
-
- IV iron effects are based on pre-IV iron hemoglobin exposure
3105
-
- Engineering to update
3106
-
- IV iron neonatal effects bugfixes
3107
3097
* - LBWSG exposures change between scenarios for simulants whose birth outcome changes between scenarios
3108
-
- Perhaps due to different exposure distributions used for stillbirths vs. livebirths? Given the different floors. Ideally the propensity would remain constant despite this. The noise introduced by this issue skews the effect of IV iron in our simulation.
3109
-
- Engineering to fix
3110
-
- IV iron neonatal effects bugfixes
3098
+
- Due to different exposure distributions used for stillbirths vs. livebirths, given the different floors.
3099
+
- Accept this limitation
3100
+
- N/A
3101
+
* - Severe anemia underestimated due to underestimate of hemoglobin exposure standard deviation for aggregated locations
3102
+
- Hemoglobin exposure SDs for aggregated locations have been generated by central machinery as a population-weighted mean of the SDs for the most detailed locations,
3103
+
which would only be correct if the mean exposure were the same across the most detailed locations.
3104
+
- GBD anemia team to update the database and/or provide a flat file for these SDs
3105
+
- N/A
3106
+
* - Moderate anemia overestimated due to IFA delays
3107
+
- We delete baseline IFA from all simulants and only add back the impact on hemoglobin when they receive IFA at ANC.
3108
+
This inflates anemia prevalence vs the GBD hemoglobin distribution.
3109
+
- Accept this limitation for now; if we revisit the baseline IFA deletion in the future, we can reassess this issue
0 commit comments