Skip to content

Content Packages #57

@jmatsushita

Description

@jmatsushita

Software libraries and projects both have:

  • a collaborative lifecycle using git, where contributions are progressively integrated in a common repository
  • a release lifecycle where a repo at a particular moment is made available to a community, usually with a version number possibly on a package repository.

It seems to make sense to also think about packaging content units when they are part of the same release cycle, and would benefit from being tagged with a version number, for instance to update clients that use the content package. This seems that it would be a building block of a technical approach to content reuse, where content packages would be collaboratively maintained and reusable.

I think there's a lot to learn from OFK's Data Packages which recently hit 1.0.

I've done some basic implementation piggy backing on the npm registry for safetag with:

Some open questions and directions of work are:

  • Wrapping up the package release in a high level interface.
  • Think about light-weight forkability and three way merge in the context of packages.
  • Transclusion between content packages.
  • Look into how this fits with content reuse

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions