Open
Description
The LICENSE.md
files for the assets
, motion-controller
and viewer
packages all contain the MIT license, but attribute the copyright to Amazon.
This struck me as somewhat odd, hence this issue asking for clarification if these licenses are correct?
For context, I plan on making some alternative hand models derived from the assets in assets/profiles/generic-hand
. As per the license I will include the full license text including the copyright notice. But in case the copyright actually belongs to someone else, I want to be sure of the exact copyright notice and license terms, before potentially propagating this mistake.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels