Looking at the structure of the current output, I see that I get essentially three @graph, two of which are nested into the third:
{
"@context: {...},
"@graph": [
{
"@graph": [...]
},
{
"@graph": [...]
}
]
}
I wonder what the motivation is to use this particular structure over
- a single
@graph with all the documents
- somehow named or identified nested graph that enable an easy decision which one has the prov info on nidmresult generation, and which one has the real thing
Regarding a semantic interpretation both modifications should not have an impact, but a simple script eating these data would have an easier time looping through a single list, than having to consider a possibly implicit structure in the node array of the top-level graph.
Thx!
Looking at the structure of the current output, I see that I get essentially three
@graph, two of which are nested into the third:I wonder what the motivation is to use this particular structure over
@graphwith all the documentsRegarding a semantic interpretation both modifications should not have an impact, but a simple script eating these data would have an easier time looping through a single list, than having to consider a possibly implicit structure in the node array of the top-level graph.
Thx!