Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Hey @gerarts, seems like a great improvement. Would you like to do a PR for this? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Currently all validators accept
any(throughtype ValidatorParam = any). Wouldn't it be better to strongly type all validator constructors?We could even add a generic to Validator like:
This would provide a better DX, and we might be able to remove some of the runtime checks (for example in string pattern), which are not implemented consistently in the current version (min- / max-string has no checks).
MinLength Validator has no runtime checks
Pattern Validator has runtime checks
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions