Updates webR quarto extension to fix problem

[averissimo]

• Fixes [Bug]: webr problems on stable and dev version #304

Changes description

• Updates quarto extension

[github-actions]

✅ All contributors have signed the CLA
_{Posted by the CLA Assistant Lite bot.}

[averissimo]

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

[github-actions]

Unit Tests Summary

340 tests   252 ✅  1m 1s ⏱️
135 suites   88 💤
  1 files      0 ❌

Results for commit d805c34.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[averissimo]

There are a bunch of snapshots failing both in main (triggered a manual check that is failing here) and in this PR.

There are (at least) 3 types of snapshot failures:

• denom = "n" just like the one below
• Differences in spacing
• .labels not assigning the correct stat name (fixed in this PR)

  ── Failure ('test-tables-lab-results-lbt14.R:1:1'): tables/lab-results/lbt14.qmd result_v1 stable ──
  Snapshot of code has changed (variant 'stable'):
  old[10:65] vs new[10:65]
                    Not High                        134 (100%)   134 (100%)     132 (100%)  
      C-Reactive Protein Measurement                                                        
            Not High                                   114          112            115      
  -                 Not High                        45 (33.6%)   55 (41.0%)     57 (43.2%)  
  +                 Not High                        45 (39.5%)   55 (49.1%)     57 (49.6%)  
  -                 1                               18 (13.4%)   18 (13.4%)     19 (14.4%)  
  +                 1                               18 (15.8%)   18 (16.1%)     19 (16.5%)  
  -                 2                               19 (14.2%)   10 (7.5%)      11 (8.3%)   
  +                 2                               19 (16.7%)   10 (8.9%)      11 (9.6%)   
  -                 3                               22 (16.4%)   13 (9.7%)      20 (15.2%)  
  +                 3                               22 (19.3%)   13 (11.6%)     20 (17.4%)  
  -                 4                               10 (7.5%)    16 (11.9%)      8 (6.1%)   
  +                 4                               10 (8.8%)    16 (14.3%)      8 (7.0%)   
            1                                           8            10             7       
  -                 Not High                         5 (3.7%)     2 (1.5%)       2 (1.5%)   
  +                 Not High                        5 (62.5%)    2 (20.0%)      2 (28.6%)   

Should the different snapshots be accepted, or should we use denom = "N_col" in the code? @insightsengineering/nest-sme ?

[edelarua]

Should the different snapshots be accepted, or should we use denom = "N_col" in the code?

You can accept the changes as is. Thanks!

[pawelru]

Thanks! Does that really solves that issue about xfun?

[averissimo]

I believe so, in my local tests, the issue is gone.