feat(docs): add concepts section#45
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This change gives the docs a separate path for the runtime model that sits behind the guide sequence.
The guides can stay closer to the decisions readers make while writing routine code, instead of carrying every ownership or boundary explanation at the point where it first appears. Concepts now has a stable place for those slower reading rules, so a guide can name a relationship and keep moving when the local task does not need the full model.
This keeps the docs split closer to the reader path: guides introduce the moves, concepts explain the runtime relationships behind them, and reference surfaces remain focused on lookup rather than carrying that conceptual load.