This is the house style. It's reverse-engineered from the two posts that nailed
the voice — why-spacex-paid-60-billion-for-a-vscode-fork.md
and git-wasnt-built-for-agents.md.
When in doubt, open those two and match them. Everything below is just naming
what they already do.
The site runs on Hugo. Posts live in content/blog/<slug>.md with +++
(TOML) front matter. Images go in images/ (SVGs in images/svg/).
Take one piece of tech news, find the part everyone is getting wrong, and explain the real story to a smart friend who isn't a specialist — in plain words, with every claim linked to a source, and a strong opinion at the end.
Write like you're talking to one curious person, not an audience.
- Second person, present tense. "You throw away the most valuable thing you made." Address the reader directly: "Read that again." "Sit with it for a second."
- Show up as a person. First-person opinions are welcome and expected: "I think they're right." "My favorite detail:" "let me explain why it's the smartest thing Mr. Musk has done all year." Have a take. Don't hedge into mush.
- Vary the rhythm. Use fragments for punch. Long explanatory sentence, then a short one that lands. "A rocket company bought a code editor." "For that." "That's the plan." "That's not noise."
- Plain words over jargon, always. If a normal person wouldn't know a term,
define it inline in parentheses the first time — casually, not like a textbook:
"every time you save a version of your code (what programmers call a
git commit)", "(A "forge" is just the website where code lives and gets reviewed — GitHub is the famous one.)", "(git blameis the tool that tells you who last touched a line and when.)" - Concrete over abstract. Real numbers, real dates, real names — and bold the ones that matter: "$60 billion", "Four billion a year by June 2026". Turn abstractions into images: "The editor is just the bucket the data drips into."
- Reframe, don't just report. The signature move is the pivot from the obvious read to the real one: "They didn't buy the editor. They bought you." "The pull request was a workaround all along." Set up what everyone assumes, then flip it.
Avoid: corporate filler ("In today's fast-paced world…"), throat-clearing intros, hype words with nothing behind them, and walls of text. No emoji. Don't explain that you're about to explain something — just do it.
- Front matter (see reference below).
- The hook — 2–3 short paragraphs, no heading. Open on a concrete fact or
scene, then immediately reframe it into the question the post answers. End the
hook by telling the reader what you're about to argue.
- SpaceX post: states the $60B fact → "A rocket company bought a code editor" → "let me explain why it's the smartest thing Mr. Musk has done all year."
- Git post: "every time you save your code, you throw away the most valuable thing you made" → sets up that the conversation is what's lost → "Two companies decided that's the problem worth fixing this month. I think they're right."
- 3–6 body sections, each under an
##heading that is an argument, not a label (see below). - A "so what does this mean for you" like section near the end — bring it back to the reader's actual day. ("If you pay them $20 a month", "So what does this actually feel like, day to day?")
- An honest caveat when the topic is a prediction or unshipped thing — say plainly what's uncertain. ("The honest caveat" / "nothing's been announced yet".) Credibility comes from admitting the limits of the take.
- A closing line that zooms out — one resonant sentence, often a callback to the opening image. "That's the save button starting to lose its grip."
- An FAQ block (shortcode — see below). Every post ends with one.
Keep posts in the ~900–1,600 word range. Tight beats long.
Each ## should make a claim or tell a mini-story, so the page is readable by
headings alone. Steal the cadence:
- "The number doesn't make sense until you watch it grow"
- "They didn't buy the editor. They bought you."
- "The irony nobody at SpaceX will say out loud"
- "What Git actually is, and why it's the wrong shape"
- "The clever part: conflicts stop being your problem"
- "The pull request was a workaround all along"
Use ## for sections and ### only for sub-points inside one. Never use #
(that's the title) and avoid ####+ — the table of contents only shows ##/###.
This is non-negotiable and a big part of why these posts read as trustworthy. Every factual claim links to a primary source inline, on the words that make the claim:
SpaceX signed the papers to buy Cursor for $60 billion
Git, born in 2005, saves your project's history…
- Link on the meaningful phrase, never "click here".
- Prefer the original source (the company's own post, the filing, the news outlet that broke it) over aggregators.
- Cross-link your own posts generously with root-relative paths, woven into
the sentence:
[Anthropic's Claude](/blog/claude-fable-5-mythos-5/),[SpaceX buying Cursor for $60 billion](/blog/why-spacex-paid-60-billion-for-a-vscode-fork/). These two posts deliberately point at each other — related posts should form a little web.
These two live in layouts/shortcodes/. Reach for them — they're part of the look.
FAQ — every post ends with one. Doubles as SEO (emits FAQPage structured
data). One Question || Answer per line; the answer may contain Markdown/links:
{{</* faq */>}}
How much did SpaceX pay for Cursor? || **$60 billion**, paid in SpaceX shares instead of cash.
Why did SpaceX buy Cursor? || For the data — the recordings of people coding inside it.
{{</* /faq */>}}
bar-chart — minimal monospace bars for showing a number growing. One
label | value | optional-sublabel per line; it auto-computes the × multiplier
between rows:
{{</* bar-chart caption="Cursor / Anysphere valuation by round" prefix="$" suffix="B" */>}}
Series B | 2.6 | Dec 2024
Series C | 9 | May 2025
Series D | 29.3 | Late 2025
SpaceX buyout | 60 | Jun 2026
{{</* /bar-chart */>}}
Other shortcodes exist (details, image, highlight, toc, …) — see
layouts/shortcodes/ and content/blog/_TEMPLATE.md for the full Markdown
toolbox. Don't overuse them; the two posts above use exactly one chart plus the
FAQ.
+++
title = "Why SpaceX paid $60 billion for a VSCode fork"
date = 2026-06-17
draft = false
tags = ["Dev", "AI", "Cursor", "SpaceX"]
complexity = "medium"
description = "SpaceX bought Cursor for $60 billion in shares, not cash. They didn't really want the code editor. They wanted the millions of people coding inside it, and the data they create."
+++title— a provocative question or bold claim, not a topic label. "Why SpaceX paid $60 billion for a VSCode fork" > "The SpaceX/Cursor deal".date—YYYY-MM-DD, unquoted. Use the real current date.draft— starttruewhile writing; flip tofalseto publish.tags— title-case topic tags. The common buckets areDev,AI,Security,Ops,Productivity,Tech— plus specific ones for the subject (Cursor,Git,Version Control). 2–4 tags is the norm.complexity— one ofeasy,medium,hard. (Posts sort by this.)description— the single most important SEO field; it's the search / social snippet. Make it a real, compelling teaser of the surprise — the same reframe as your hook. The template suggests ~160 chars; the recent posts run a bit longer (1–3 sentences) and that's fine.image— optional; social-card banner is auto-generated from metadata if omitted.
- Create
content/blog/<kebab-case-slug>.md. The slug becomes the URL (/blog/<slug>/), so make it readable and keyword-bearing. - Write the front matter with
draft = trueand today's date. - Draft the post against this guide.
- Re-read the two reference posts side by side and close the gap.
- Set
draft = falsewhen it's ready. - Cross-link any related existing posts both ways.
- Title is a claim or question, not a label.
- Hook opens concrete, then reframes within the first 3 paragraphs.
- Every
##heading reads as an argument on its own. - Every factual claim has an inline source link on the meaningful words.
- Jargon is defined in plain words, inline, the first time it appears.
- Key numbers and pivots are bolded; sentence rhythm varies (some short).
- Related posts are cross-linked both directions.
- There's a "what this means for you" beat and, if it's a prediction, an honest caveat.
- Closing line zooms out / calls back to the opening.
- Post ends with an
{{</* faq */>}}block. - Front matter complete:
description,tags,complexity, realdate,draft = false.