-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Expand file tree
/
Copy path7_conclusions.html
More file actions
1134 lines (1103 loc) · 131 KB
/
7_conclusions.html
File metadata and controls
1134 lines (1103 loc) · 131 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en" xml:lang="en"><head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="generator" content="quarto-1.8.25">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0, user-scalable=yes">
<meta name="author" content="Nicola Aravecchia">
<title>7 Conclusions – Amheida IV: ʿAin el-Gedida</title>
<style>
code{white-space: pre-wrap;}
span.smallcaps{font-variant: small-caps;}
div.columns{display: flex; gap: min(4vw, 1.5em);}
div.column{flex: auto; overflow-x: auto;}
div.hanging-indent{margin-left: 1.5em; text-indent: -1.5em;}
ul.task-list{list-style: none;}
ul.task-list li input[type="checkbox"] {
width: 0.8em;
margin: 0 0.8em 0.2em -1em; /* quarto-specific, see https://github.com/quarto-dev/quarto-cli/issues/4556 */
vertical-align: middle;
}
/* CSS for citations */
div.csl-bib-body { }
div.csl-entry {
clear: both;
margin-bottom: 0em;
}
.hanging-indent div.csl-entry {
margin-left:2em;
text-indent:-2em;
}
div.csl-left-margin {
min-width:2em;
float:left;
}
div.csl-right-inline {
margin-left:2em;
padding-left:1em;
}
div.csl-indent {
margin-left: 2em;
}</style>
<script src="site_libs/quarto-nav/quarto-nav.js"></script>
<script src="site_libs/quarto-nav/headroom.min.js"></script>
<script src="site_libs/clipboard/clipboard.min.js"></script>
<script src="site_libs/quarto-search/autocomplete.umd.js"></script>
<script src="site_libs/quarto-search/fuse.min.js"></script>
<script src="site_libs/quarto-search/quarto-search.js"></script>
<meta name="quarto:offset" content="./">
<link href="./8_la-ceramique.html" rel="next">
<link href="./6_west-complex.html" rel="prev">
<script src="site_libs/quarto-html/quarto.js" type="module"></script>
<script src="site_libs/quarto-html/tabsets/tabsets.js" type="module"></script>
<script src="site_libs/quarto-html/axe/axe-check.js" type="module"></script>
<script src="site_libs/quarto-html/popper.min.js"></script>
<script src="site_libs/quarto-html/tippy.umd.min.js"></script>
<script src="site_libs/quarto-html/anchor.min.js"></script>
<link href="site_libs/quarto-html/tippy.css" rel="stylesheet">
<link href="site_libs/quarto-html/quarto-syntax-highlighting-7b89279ff1a6dce999919e0e67d4d9ec.css" rel="stylesheet" id="quarto-text-highlighting-styles">
<script src="site_libs/bootstrap/bootstrap.min.js"></script>
<link href="site_libs/bootstrap/bootstrap-icons.css" rel="stylesheet">
<link href="site_libs/bootstrap/bootstrap-27c261d06b905028a18691de25d09dde.min.css" rel="stylesheet" append-hash="true" id="quarto-bootstrap" data-mode="light">
<script id="quarto-search-options" type="application/json">{
"location": "sidebar",
"copy-button": false,
"collapse-after": 3,
"panel-placement": "start",
"type": "textbox",
"limit": 50,
"keyboard-shortcut": [
"f",
"/",
"s"
],
"show-item-context": false,
"language": {
"search-no-results-text": "No results",
"search-matching-documents-text": "matching documents",
"search-copy-link-title": "Copy link to search",
"search-hide-matches-text": "Hide additional matches",
"search-more-match-text": "more match in this document",
"search-more-matches-text": "more matches in this document",
"search-clear-button-title": "Clear",
"search-text-placeholder": "",
"search-detached-cancel-button-title": "Cancel",
"search-submit-button-title": "Submit",
"search-label": "Search"
}
}</script>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="assets/css/isaw-monographs-style.css">
</head>
<body class="nav-sidebar floating slimcontent quarto-light">
<div id="quarto-search-results"></div>
<header id="quarto-header" class="headroom fixed-top">
<nav class="quarto-secondary-nav">
<div class="container-fluid d-flex">
<button type="button" class="quarto-btn-toggle btn" data-bs-toggle="collapse" role="button" data-bs-target=".quarto-sidebar-collapse-item" aria-controls="quarto-sidebar" aria-expanded="false" aria-label="Toggle sidebar navigation" onclick="if (window.quartoToggleHeadroom) { window.quartoToggleHeadroom(); }">
<i class="bi bi-layout-text-sidebar-reverse"></i>
</button>
<nav class="quarto-page-breadcrumbs" aria-label="breadcrumb"><ol class="breadcrumb"><li class="breadcrumb-item"><a href="./7_conclusions.html"><span class="chapter-number">7</span> <span class="chapter-title">Conclusions</span></a></li></ol></nav>
<a class="flex-grow-1" role="navigation" data-bs-toggle="collapse" data-bs-target=".quarto-sidebar-collapse-item" aria-controls="quarto-sidebar" aria-expanded="false" aria-label="Toggle sidebar navigation" onclick="if (window.quartoToggleHeadroom) { window.quartoToggleHeadroom(); }">
</a>
<button type="button" class="btn quarto-search-button" aria-label="Search" onclick="window.quartoOpenSearch();">
<i class="bi bi-search"></i>
</button>
</div>
</nav>
</header>
<!-- content -->
<div id="quarto-content" class="quarto-container page-columns page-rows-contents page-layout-article">
<!-- sidebar -->
<nav id="quarto-sidebar" class="sidebar collapse collapse-horizontal quarto-sidebar-collapse-item sidebar-navigation floating overflow-auto">
<div class="pt-lg-2 mt-2 text-left sidebar-header sidebar-header-stacked">
<a href="./index.html" class="sidebar-logo-link">
</a>
<div class="sidebar-title mb-0 py-0">
<a href="./">Amheida IV: ʿAin el-Gedida</a>
</div>
</div>
<div class="mt-2 flex-shrink-0 align-items-center">
<div class="sidebar-search">
<div id="quarto-search" class="" title="Search"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="sidebar-menu-container">
<ul class="list-unstyled mt-1">
<li class="sidebar-item">
<div class="sidebar-item-container">
<a href="./index.html" class="sidebar-item-text sidebar-link">
<span class="menu-text">Amheida IV: ʿAin el-Gedida</span></a>
</div>
</li>
<li class="sidebar-item">
<div class="sidebar-item-container">
<a href="./0_contents.html" class="sidebar-item-text sidebar-link">
<span class="menu-text">Contents</span></a>
</div>
</li>
<li class="sidebar-item">
<div class="sidebar-item-container">
<a href="./0_digital_statement.html" class="sidebar-item-text sidebar-link">
<span class="menu-text">Note on Digital Edition</span></a>
</div>
</li>
<li class="sidebar-item">
<div class="sidebar-item-container">
<a href="./0_foreword.html" class="sidebar-item-text sidebar-link">
<span class="menu-text">Foreword</span></a>
</div>
</li>
<li class="sidebar-item">
<div class="sidebar-item-container">
<a href="./0_preface.html" class="sidebar-item-text sidebar-link">
<span class="menu-text">Preface</span></a>
</div>
</li>
<li class="sidebar-item">
<div class="sidebar-item-container">
<a href="./1_introduction.html" class="sidebar-item-text sidebar-link">
<span class="menu-text"><span class="chapter-number">1</span> <span class="chapter-title">Introduction</span></span></a>
</div>
</li>
<li class="sidebar-item">
<div class="sidebar-item-container">
<a href="./2_survey.html" class="sidebar-item-text sidebar-link">
<span class="menu-text"><span class="chapter-number">2</span> <span class="chapter-title">Topographical and Architectural Survey of Mounds I-V</span></span></a>
</div>
</li>
<li class="sidebar-item">
<div class="sidebar-item-container">
<a href="./3_mound-1.html" class="sidebar-item-text sidebar-link">
<span class="menu-text"><span class="chapter-number">3</span> <span class="chapter-title">Mound I: The Church Complex</span></span></a>
</div>
</li>
<li class="sidebar-item">
<div class="sidebar-item-container">
<a href="./4_excavations-outside.html" class="sidebar-item-text sidebar-link">
<span class="menu-text"><span class="chapter-number">4</span> <span class="chapter-title">Excavations Outside the Church Complex</span></span></a>
</div>
</li>
<li class="sidebar-item">
<div class="sidebar-item-container">
<a href="./5_church-complex.html" class="sidebar-item-text sidebar-link">
<span class="menu-text"><span class="chapter-number">5</span> <span class="chapter-title">The Church Complex and Surrounding Structures</span></span></a>
</div>
</li>
<li class="sidebar-item">
<div class="sidebar-item-container">
<a href="./6_west-complex.html" class="sidebar-item-text sidebar-link">
<span class="menu-text"><span class="chapter-number">6</span> <span class="chapter-title">The West Complex on Mound I</span></span></a>
</div>
</li>
<li class="sidebar-item">
<div class="sidebar-item-container">
<a href="./7_conclusions.html" class="sidebar-item-text sidebar-link active">
<span class="menu-text"><span class="chapter-number">7</span> <span class="chapter-title">Conclusions</span></span></a>
</div>
</li>
<li class="sidebar-item">
<div class="sidebar-item-container">
<a href="./8_la-ceramique.html" class="sidebar-item-text sidebar-link">
<span class="menu-text"><span class="chapter-number">8</span> <span class="chapter-title">La céramique d’ʿAin el-Gedida</span></span></a>
</div>
</li>
<li class="sidebar-item">
<div class="sidebar-item-container">
<a href="./9_coins.html" class="sidebar-item-text sidebar-link">
<span class="menu-text"><span class="chapter-number">9</span> <span class="chapter-title">Coins from the 2006–2008 Excavations</span></span></a>
</div>
</li>
<li class="sidebar-item">
<div class="sidebar-item-container">
<a href="./10_ostraka-and-graffiti.html" class="sidebar-item-text sidebar-link">
<span class="menu-text"><span class="chapter-number">10</span> <span class="chapter-title">Ostraka and Graffiti</span></span></a>
</div>
</li>
<li class="sidebar-item">
<div class="sidebar-item-container">
<a href="./11_miscellaneous-objects.html" class="sidebar-item-text sidebar-link">
<span class="menu-text"><span class="chapter-number">11</span> <span class="chapter-title">Small Finds from ʿAin el-Gedida: Other Categories</span></span></a>
</div>
</li>
<li class="sidebar-item">
<div class="sidebar-item-container">
<a href="./12_animal-bone-remains.html" class="sidebar-item-text sidebar-link">
<span class="menu-text"><span class="chapter-number">12</span> <span class="chapter-title">Animal Bone Remains from ʿAin el-Gedida</span></span></a>
</div>
</li>
<li class="sidebar-item">
<div class="sidebar-item-container">
<a href="./references.html" class="sidebar-item-text sidebar-link">
<span class="menu-text">References</span></a>
</div>
</li>
<li class="sidebar-item">
<div class="sidebar-item-container">
<a href="./errata.html" class="sidebar-item-text sidebar-link">
<span class="menu-text">Errata</span></a>
</div>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
</nav>
<div id="quarto-sidebar-glass" class="quarto-sidebar-collapse-item" data-bs-toggle="collapse" data-bs-target=".quarto-sidebar-collapse-item"></div>
<!-- margin-sidebar -->
<div id="quarto-margin-sidebar" class="sidebar margin-sidebar">
<nav id="TOC" role="doc-toc" class="toc-active">
<h2 id="toc-title">Table of contents</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="#sec-7.1" id="toc-sec-7.1" class="nav-link active" data-scroll-target="#sec-7.1"><span class="header-section-number">7.1</span> Issues of Chronology</a></li>
<li><a href="#sec-7.2" id="toc-sec-7.2" class="nav-link" data-scroll-target="#sec-7.2"><span class="header-section-number">7.2</span> Monastery or <em>Epoikion</em>? The Monastic Connection and Alternative Readings</a></li>
<li><a href="#epilogue" id="toc-epilogue" class="nav-link" data-scroll-target="#epilogue"><span class="header-section-number">7.3</span> Epilogue</a></li>
<li><a href="#notes" id="toc-notes" class="nav-link" data-scroll-target="#notes"><span class="header-section-number">7.4</span> Notes</a></li>
</ul>
</nav>
</div>
<!-- main -->
<main class="content page-columns page-full" id="quarto-document-content">
<header id="title-block-header" class="quarto-title-block default">
<div class="quarto-title">
<h1 class="title"><span id="sec-chapter-7" class="quarto-section-identifier"><span class="chapter-number">7</span> <span class="chapter-title">Conclusions</span></span></h1>
</div>
<div class="quarto-title-meta">
<div>
<div class="quarto-title-meta-heading">Author</div>
<div class="quarto-title-meta-contents">
<p>Nicola Aravecchia </p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</header>
<p><strong><em>This is an online digital edition from ISAW Digital Monographs. The print edition of this work can be consulted at <a href="https://isaw.nyu.edu/publications/isaw-monographs/ain-el-gedida">https://isaw.nyu.edu/publications/isaw-monographs/ain-el-gedida</a></em></strong></p>
<section id="sec-7.1" class="level2 page-columns page-full" data-number="7.1">
<h2 data-number="7.1" class="anchored" data-anchor-id="sec-7.1"><span class="header-section-number">7.1</span> Issues of Chronology</h2>
<div class="page-columns page-full"><p id="p1">
The chronology of ʿAin el-Gedida was established on the basis of a study of the architectural and material evidence gathered during the excavations carried out at the site. Although of significant value in many respects, the analysis of the architectural features investigated on the main hill, and also of those surveyed on the other mounds, does not provide particularly relevant information to establish, with any degree of precision, an absolute chronology of the site. Construction materials used at the site (mostly mud bricks and a few stones used as lintels), the construction techniques employed (often mixed and of rather poor quality), and the dimensions of wall and vault bricks (of standard Roman size with little variation) cannot be identified as proper to any specific geographic and chronological range within Late Antique Egypt. Both the materials and the techniques employed at ʿAin el-Gedida are, in fact, the same used for centuries at innumerable other sites in Dakhla, the nearby oases, the larger region of the Western Desert, and throughout Egypt. That noted, the spatial arrangement discerned at ʿAin el-Gedida, on mound I and partially on the smaller hills, is very complex and unusual, not resembling too closely the layout of other known village or monastery-like settlements.
</p><div class="no-row-height column-margin column-container"><span class="margin-aside">p. 269</span></div></div>
<div class="page-columns page-full"><p id="p2">
The study of the architectural evidence has allowed us to discover the existence not only of limited alterations and/or restorations, involving features such as walls and doorways, but also of substantially different construction phases, identified in several rooms of mound I below floor level.<a href="#fn1" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref1" role="doc-noteref"><sup>1</sup></a> The discovery, in 2008, of a large building near the west edge of the hill provided further information testifying to the multi-phased construction history for the site. As discussed above, the underlying layout of this structure, which served, at least in its latest occupational phase, as an industrial workshop for the production of pottery, seems to reflect that of a small-scale pagan temple made of mud bricks.<a href="#fn2" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref2" role="doc-noteref"><sup>2</sup></a>
</p><div class="no-row-height column-margin column-container"><span class="margin-aside">p. 270</span></div></div>
<p id="p3">
Overall, the archaeological record about ʿAin el-Gedida, especially the temple and the church complex, points to a layered history that seems to extend back in time further than the chronological range, established through the study of the material evidence from occupational levels, would suggest. In particular, the identification of the west complex as a temple would support the existence of the settlement since probably at least the second century CE, certainly by the middle of the third century, when most building activity concerning pagan temples seems to end in Egypt.<a href="#fn3" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref3" role="doc-noteref"><sup>3</sup></a> The absolute chronology of each phase is very difficult to reconstruct, however. The older architectural features were, in several instances, razed to the lowest courses of bricks. These were often laid directly on gebel without any foundation trenches, whose fill might have provided useful dating information. Furthermore, the material evidence that was gathered during the excavations at the site is rather homogeneous, not allowing us to distinguish among the different construction phases more precisely.
</p>
<p id="p4">
The numismatic evidence plays a valuable role in the establishment of the general chronology of ʿAin el-Gedida. Indeed, the coins retrieved in several contexts within the church complex and throughout all areas investigated on mound I, especially along the streets running to the east and south of rooms B5 and A46 (i.e., the church and the gathering hall) have allowed us to gather a considerable amount of information on the chronological framework of the settlement. Nonetheless, some limitations exist on the use of this numismatic evidence. As emphasized by G. Bowen in relation to the site of Kellis, one cannot rely exclusively upon coins found at any archaeological site to reconstruct its chronology.<a href="#fn4" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref4" role="doc-noteref"><sup>4</sup></a> Indeed, a very large number of specimens retrieved at ʿAin el-Gedida come from contexts that are unreliable or of dubious reliability, although it is worthy of note that the chronological distribution of these does not substantially differ from the coins found in more secure contexts.<a href="#fn5" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref5" role="doc-noteref"><sup>5</sup></a> Another limitation is caused by the relatively high percentage of coins whose state of preservation was so poor as to forbid any secure identification and/or dating. A rather broad chronological range could be assigned to several unreadable specimens, on the basis of their dimensions and weight, although corrosion caused, in many instances, substantial loss of thickness and weight.
</p>
<div class="page-columns page-full"><p id="p5">
At any rate, the overall pattern of coin loss at ʿAin el-Gedida testifies to an occupational period that undoubtedly covered the fourth century CE. The small number of coins dated to the second half of the previous century, found in highly disturbed contexts in the proximity of the church’s apse, are not necessarily evidence of an earlier construction phase of the rooms predating the complex (and incorporated into it).<a href="#fn6" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref6" role="doc-noteref"><sup>6</sup></a> In fact, older issues could still be in circulation, or kept in hoards by private citizens, long after they had been withdrawn from the official pool, particularly following the currency reform of 296 carried out by Diocletian.<a href="#fn7" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref7" role="doc-noteref"><sup>7</sup></a> Furthermore, it should be noted that the numismatic evidence from the church complex (matching that from the other excavated areas), fits with that from the Small East Church at Kellis, which is also typologically very similar to the church of ʿAin el-Gedida.<a href="#fn8" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref8" role="doc-noteref"><sup>8</sup></a> Nevertheless, some degree of caution is in order, at least with regard to ʿAin el-Gedida, since, as already mentioned above, a significant number of coins found inside the church complex (and in the surrounding rooms) are either unreadable or only broadly datable to the fourth century CE.
</p><div class="no-row-height column-margin column-container"><span class="margin-aside">p. 271</span></div></div>
<p id="p6">
The information gathered from the analysis of coins from ʿAin el-Gedida suggests that the site ceased to be inhabited sometime towards the end of the fourth century. There are several coins that have been assigned by D. Ratzan to the second half of the fourth century; most of them are datable up to the third quarter of the fourth century, with only a few specimens dated to the very end of that century, or more broadly assigned to the late fourth–fifth century.<a href="#fn9" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref9" role="doc-noteref"><sup>9</sup></a> However, there is a degree of uncertainty in the readings of at least a few of these specimens; therefore, in the absence of more secure identifications, these cannot be used to prove a longer life-span, with regard to the whole settlement, extending beyond the late fourth century.
</p>
<p id="p7">
Ceramics are another highly significant category of evidence for the establishment of the site’s chronology. The analysis and classification of pottery finds was started by Gillian Pyke and carried to completion by Delphine Dixneuf.<a href="#fn10" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref10" role="doc-noteref"><sup>10</sup></a> A catalogue of forms and fabrics from the site was created on the basis of the repertoire from the nearby site of Kellis, with which the material from ʿAin el-Gedida is very consistent.<a href="#fn11" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref11" role="doc-noteref"><sup>11</sup></a> The pottery assemblages from Kellis were extensively studied by C. Hope and A. Dunsmore, whose work has become a standard reference source for the study of Late Roman pottery in Dakhla.<a href="#fn12" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref12" role="doc-noteref"><sup>12</sup></a> Strong parallels, with regard to fourth-century types and materials, can be established with the evidence from several other sites in Dakhla, including Amheida, and also from Kharga.<a href="#fn13" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref13" role="doc-noteref"><sup>13</sup></a>
</p>
<div class="page-columns page-full"><p id="p8">
The range of the ceramic repertoire from the church complex and its neighboring rooms (B10–B15) is consistent with the evidence gathered in the northern half of mound I, in particular within rooms B1–B4, where two significant ceramic deposits were unearthed.<a href="#fn14" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref14" role="doc-noteref"><sup>14</sup></a> Indeed, the complete vessels and the diagnostic sherds found in the northern and central part of mound I, particularly in the two assemblages from rooms B1 and B4, include many of the types that were collected in area A, i.e., in the southern part of the hill, during the 2006–2007 survey.<a href="#fn15" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref15" role="doc-noteref"><sup>15</sup></a> Among them are jars, flasks, cooking-pots, craters, plates, and several bowls, often painted with white slip on the outer surface and red dots along the rim.
</p><div class="no-row-height column-margin column-container"><span class="margin-aside">p. 272</span></div></div>
<p id="p9">
Overall, the ceramic repertoire from ʿAin el-Gedida is rather limited in its number of fabrics, with a large majority of polished ware, made with iron- or calcium-rich clay and mostly of local production, while imports from the Kharga Oasis and the Nile Valley are rare.<a href="#fn16" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref16" role="doc-noteref"><sup>16</sup></a> The treatment of the surfaces is generally poor and their decoration is simple and quite standard, often limited, as mentioned above, to red dots painted along the rim. There is also a prevalence of small objects, such as cups, bowls, and plates, over larger containers, although the latter are represented within most units. Although they were found in different contexts and rooms, all these vessels, forming the corpus of ʿAin el-Gedida, share a character that is consistent with a domestic assemblage and a fairly poor rural environment.<a href="#fn17" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref17" role="doc-noteref"><sup>17</sup></a>
</p>
<p id="p10">
The complete vessels and the large quantity of pottery sherds largely confirm the chronological range established by the numismatic analysis, that is to say, an occupational phase extending to the third quarter of the fourth century CE.<a href="#fn18" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref18" role="doc-noteref"><sup>18</sup></a> Limited evidence of Early Roman forms was found in one room (kitchen B10), besides some third-century pieces likely used as chinking sherds for the construction of vaults. The Early Roman vessels from room B10 and the third-century coins from the church allow for the possibility that the site might have gone through occupational phases dating back to the third century or even earlier. It is true that the coins come from unreliable units and the Early Roman pottery was found in contexts mixed with fourth century material. Furthermore, no ceramic or numismatic evidence earlier than the fourth century CE was found in any other excavated room. However, it is unlikely that the pottery sherds datable to the third century came from another site or that third-century vessels were still in use during the fourth century. Therefore, they are valid indicators of earlier phases of occupation at the site.
</p>
<p id="p11">
Providing similar information to the pottery and coins are the ceramic lamps uncovered in several rooms of mound I. They can be generally dated to the Late Roman/Byzantine period and are commonly found in other fourth and fifth-century contexts in Dakhla.<a href="#fn19" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref19" role="doc-noteref"><sup>19</sup></a>
</p>
<p id="p12">
Another type of material evidence that is used to date archaeological deposits consists of ostraka. Twelve of them were found at ʿAin el-Gedida, two in Coptic and the rest in Greek. Roger Bagnall and Dorota Dzierzbicka dated the creation of eleven of them to the fourth-century, largely on the basis of content and palaeography. One ostrakon was dated, instead, to the third century based on content.<a href="#fn20" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref20" role="doc-noteref"><sup>20</sup></a> Those with more precise information come from after 350; some have connections to Kellis documents from the period 350–370. This analysis confirms and supplements the data provided by the other categories of material evidence listed above.
</p>
<div class="page-columns page-full"><p id="p13">
Aside from ceramics (including ostraka and lamps) and coins, other categories of small finds collected at ʿAin el-Gedida do not provide significant information that can be used to establish (or confirm beyond doubt) the site’s chronology.<a href="#fn21" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref21" role="doc-noteref"><sup>21</sup></a> They can hardly be assigned to a specific time frame, and only their association with otherwise datable contexts allows their tentative dating. Although of a limited chronological value, these objects offer valuable data for the study of material culture at ʿAin el-Gedida and at other sites in the oasis. Indeed, the typology of the evidence from ʿAin el-Gedida is consistent with the range found at several other sites in Dakhla, such as nearby Kellis, both from domestic and public contexts, and also Amheida, in particular from the excavation of large domestic units.<a href="#fn22" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref22" role="doc-noteref"><sup>22</sup></a>
</p><div class="no-row-height column-margin column-container"><span class="margin-aside">p. 273</span></div></div>
<p id="p14">
A puzzling question, directly related to the issue of chronology of ʿAin el-Gedida, concerns the abandonment of the site. The archaeological record, gathered during the 2006–2008 excavation seasons and the survey of the structures investigated in the mid-1990s, has not provided, thus far, any evidence suggesting episodes of violent destruction, which might have led the inhabitants to leave the site abruptly. Indeed, no clue pointing to extensive fires was detected in any of the excavated rooms, either on their walls or floors or in their stratigraphy. The numerous layers consisting of vault and/or wall collapses seem to have formed at various times and resulted from natural factors, such as prolonged exposure to the elements after their abandonment, rather than human action. Deposits of ash, charcoal, and smoke on the walls were identified in several contexts. However, these were all related to cooking activities and indeed were found, for the most part, in kitchens, domestic middens, and rooms with hearths (such as anteroom B6 in the church complex and courtyard B1 in the partially excavated unit in the northern half of mound I). Another piece of information allows us to assume that the abandonment of the site did not occur abruptly but was carefully planned. This was mentioned in the discussion of the archaeological evidence from the church complex, but it applies to the entire area that was the object of investigation at ʿAin el-Gedida. Indeed, no objects of significant value were found in the rooms that were excavated. Overall, very few complete items were retrieved, and most of the material evidence consists of fragmentary objects, such as pieces of textile, bracelets, and ceramics. A few vessels were found in good condition, such as those unearthed in courtyard B1, but they must have not held a considerable value in antiquity, as they included cooking vessels for everyday use, which could be easily replaced once broken. The only finds from ʿAin el-Gedida with a monetary value (in the fourth century) are coins. The specimens gathered during the excavations had not been hidden in hoards; rather, they were found scattered within the stratigraphy of each room. Most likely, the coins collected on the streets leading to the church complex had been accidentally lost by people passing by. At any rate, none of the coins was of a precious metal, and their value individually was very low.
</p>
<p id="p15">
In general, the archaeological record suggests that the buildings of ʿAin el-Gedida, at least those investigated on mound I, had been emptied of any valuable object by their owners. Although it is not impossible, it seems unlikely that they were pillaged after their abandonment. If the whole site had been in fact the target of looters, the latter must have acted in antiquity, before the ancient deposits of wall and vault collapse and the windblown sand filled the rooms. Indeed, even the earliest stratigraphical layers, including the occupational contexts at floor level, did not include precious items, or many items at all.
</p>
<div class="page-columns page-full"><p id="p16">
Possibly, the abandonment of the site was not the outcome of a sudden incident of unknown nature, but was a planned event, taking place in a restricted time span, but not so short that the villagers could not sort their possessions and take with them anything they wanted before leaving.
</p><div class="no-row-height column-margin column-container"><span class="margin-aside">p. 274</span></div></div>
<p id="p17">
Similar circumstances apply to other archaeological sites throughout the oasis. Particularly relevant in this context, due to its proximity to ʿAin el-Gedida, is the ancient settlement of Kellis (modern-day Ismant el-Kharab). Its excavators did not find any significant evidence pointing to violent destruction, such as extensive fires, which might have caused the abandonment of the large village toward the end of the fourth century CE.<a href="#fn23" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref23" role="doc-noteref"><sup>23</sup></a> It seems, however, that what happened at ʿAin el-Gedida, that is to say, the more-or-less simultaneous abandonment of the entire site by its inhabitants was, in fact, part of a phenomenon involving large parts of the region.<a href="#fn24" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref24" role="doc-noteref"><sup>24</sup></a> The scholars working in the area share the same concern about the necessity of shedding light on the possible causes. The discussion has focused on several key issues, such as climate change, economic depression, or political unrest. A phenomenon of increasing “ruralization” was detected, during the fourth century, at several sites of the region, such as Douch in the Kharga Oasis. The archaeologists who worked at this large and once prosperous village recognized traces of this trend in the partition and re-use of earlier buildings as stables. These alterations were combined with the construction of <em>loculi</em>, or low rectangular features at the corner or along the walls of these rooms, likely to feed animals that were employed in agricultural activities.<a href="#fn25" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref25" role="doc-noteref"><sup>25</sup></a> Abundant organic material was found that demonstrated the existence of numerous animals inside older houses turned into stables. The archaeological evidence assigns these changes to the latest occupational phase of the site, not long before its abandonment, which was complete by the fifth century. At Kellis, too, some larger buildings were turned, in the site’s later phases, into masses of small rooms and stables.<a href="#fn26" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref26" role="doc-noteref"><sup>26</sup></a> This phenomenon is attested also at Trimiths/Amheida, where a school was transformed, around the mid-fourth century, into a stable that became part of the so-called House of Serenos.<a href="#fn27" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref27" role="doc-noteref"><sup>27</sup></a>
</p>
<p id="p18">
At first glance, one could imagine a similar scenario, at least in part, with regard to ʿAin el-Gedida. Indeed, fairly abundant amounts of organic material, including coprolites and straw, were found in some parts of the site, especially along the passageway to the south of the church complex. Also, two features very closely resembling the <em>loculi</em> of Douch were discovered along the south side of courtyard B13, at the intersection of street B12 with vaulted passageway B11. The fourth-century range of the evidence from Douch also fits the record from ʿAin el-Gedida. However, the relatively limited area that was the object of investigation at the latter site prevents us from drawing conclusions on a generalized phenomenon of ruralization, which would have occurred on all mounds toward the end of their occupational life. Indeed, such a trend, although deserving investigation, is not supported by enough data at the moment. Also, if ʿAin el-Gedida had been, in fact, an agricultural site, it would be difficult to apply the concept of “ruralization” to it and recognize its traces. Animals must have always been a ubiquitous presence at ʿAin el-Gedida, as well as throughout the oasis.
</p>
<div class="page-columns page-full"><p id="p19">
At any rate, notwithstanding economic and social changes possibly taking place at ʿAin el-Gedida during the fourth century, the reasons that led all its inhabitants, as well as those of other sites like Kellis, to abandon their houses and move somewhere else (where, it is not known) have not found a fully satisfying answer thus far.
</p><div class="no-row-height column-margin column-container"><span class="margin-aside">p. 275</span></div></div>
</section>
<section id="sec-7.2" class="level2 page-columns page-full" data-number="7.2">
<h2 data-number="7.2" class="anchored" data-anchor-id="sec-7.2"><span class="header-section-number">7.2</span> Monastery or <em>Epoikion</em>? The Monastic Connection and Alternative Readings</h2>
<p id="p20">
</p><p>Since the Egyptian excavations, which were carried out in the mid-1990s, started uncovering archaeological features in the southern half of mound I, the possibility that ʿAin el-Gedida might have been a monastic settlement was raised.<a href="#fn28" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref28" role="doc-noteref"><sup>28</sup></a> Scholars visiting the site at that time noticed a highly peculiar layout of the excavated structures, clustered around a large kitchen with several ovens, and consisting of an intricate network of interconnected spaces, several of which had certainly been in use as storage rooms.<a href="#fn29" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref29" role="doc-noteref"><sup>29</sup></a> Indeed, it is not possible to recognize, within the complex spatial configuration of area A, separate buildings showing the distinctive characters of domestic units. The only exception is represented by some rooms located at the southeast end of the hill (rooms A35–A37 and A38–A40). They seem to have been built as separate clusters of at least three rooms each, with the biggest one likely serving as a rectangular courtyard. Unfortunately, this sector was only partially excavated, and the data that are currently available are very limited, not allowing us to draw significant conclusions on the nature of these spaces. Nor, in any case, do the visible layouts resemble in any significant way those of other domestic structures known from this period in the oases.</p>
<p></p>
<p id="p21">
</p><p>As previously seen, the survey of the southern part of mound I revealed different construction phases and evidence of restoration and/or re-use of earlier features in later structures. This part of the settlement, more extensively excavated than its northern half, seems to have developed from a central core of buildings, to which other rooms were progressively added, lying against or incorporating the outer walls of the earlier structures. The rooms identified along the south, southwest, and southeast edges of mound I were built with a very poor technique and did not follow any systematic plan. Their hasty construction history suggests, as argued in K. Bayoumi’s report, that these structures were built to satisfy a rapidly increasing population at the site.<a href="#fn30" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref30" role="doc-noteref"><sup>30</sup></a> However, no significant information is available to identify who these people were, and the lack of excavation records of area A is particularly unfortunate in this respect.</p>
<p></p>
<div class="page-columns page-full"><p id="p22">
The existence of a large kitchen, centrally placed and connected with the northern/central half of the mound, and of several magazines, containing clay bins for the storage of cereals or other crops, assigns the whole area mostly utilitarian functions. The absence, once again, of clearly recognizable domestic units and the overall spatial configuration, with most rooms built against and interconnected with each other, points to a social structure based on communal living rather than separate family households.
</p><div class="no-row-height column-margin column-container"><span class="margin-aside">p. 276</span></div></div>
<p id="p23">
</p><p>The discovery of the church (room B5) in 2006 and the investigation of the annexed complex between 2007 and 2008 provided additional data, which shed light on the highly Christianized society living at the site in the fourth century. The complex, capable of hosting a considerable number of people at any given time, was centrally placed on the main hill of the site and, one can assume, easily reachable from all other mounds (if they were in fact discrete units in that period). The excavation of the area to the east and south of the church confirmed the strategic location of the complex along a north–south axis, which connected the two ends of mound I. Furthermore, the network of streets lining the complex allowed for easy access to the latter from area A to the south and, in particular, from its large kitchen through a north–south oriented passageway. An additional bakery (room B15), also bearing evidence of several ovens, was found in 2008 right across the street from the entrance into the complex. The presence of two wide kitchens, undoubtedly not belonging to private, domestic contexts but rather used to answer the needs of a significant number of people; their proximity to the complex and, in particular, to the large gathering hall, capable of seating a considerable number of guests: these elements are, in fact, suggestive of a spatial arrangement entailing the existence, on site, of a large community of people not organized in the manner of a family, whether nuclear or extended. The considerable size of the hall and the existence of <em>mastabas</em>, or benches, that could seat a large number of people at any given time only emphasize the possibility that many individuals could access the church complex together. It does not provide information on who these people were or where they came from. On one hand, evidence of large halls opening directly onto churches is abundant in Egyptian monastic contexts.<a href="#fn31" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref31" role="doc-noteref"><sup>31</sup></a> On the other hand, similar spatial arrangements are attested at sites that have not been identified as monastic, like Kellis and its Small East Church. The lack of incontrovertible data on the function carried out by room A46 (which might be identified either as a hall for catechumens, a refectory, or a space for laity) and the shifting, at least to some degree, of its purpose, as pointed to by architectural alterations that occurred before the abandonment of the site, leave the question open. Overall, the presence of the church complex on mound I is not, <em>per se</em>, evidence for a monastic identification of the site, nor is its proximity to large kitchens and the unusual layout of the south half of the hill.</p>
<p></p>
<p id="p24">
</p><div class="page-columns page-full"><p>Neither the Egyptian nor the 2006–2008 excavations uncovered any sizable structures at ʿAin el-Gedida that could be identified as large dormitories or houses for a monastic community, nor buildings divided into a series of cells, as were found at monastic sites throughout Egypt. At the same time, no comprehensive data are available on domestic arrangements for family units at ʿAin el-Gedida. A few buildings surveyed on mound I, particularly near the northwest or southeast ends of the hill, and also excavated rooms B1–B3 (plus the two unexcavated rooms to the north of B1) are characterized by a compact, self-contained layout of small rooms opening onto a larger room, possibly functioning as a courtyard, which may suggest their identification as residential units for relatively small groups of people. However, the lack of documentation does not allow us to know beyond doubt if these spaces once belonged to private dwellings or served a different function. The paucity of remains of identifiably domestic architecture found thus far at the site could be explained by the relatively limited area that was the object of archaeological investigation, compared to the overall extent of the ancient settlement. Indeed, it is not to be excluded that most people resided on the other mounds, while the main hill hosted, although not exclusively, buildings of a more communal nature, such as the church complex, or small-scale industrial installations, including the large kitchens/bakeries, the storage rooms, and even a ceramic workshop at the west edge of the hill.</p><div class="no-row-height column-margin column-container"><span class="margin-aside">p. 277</span></div></div>
<p></p>
<p id="p25">
</p><p>If any monks lived at the site in the fourth century, they might have used or re-used forms that were well-established and common in Egyptian domestic architecture, in light of the lack of standardized types for monastic architecture at such an early time. It is possible that early Egyptian ascetics lived in dwellings that would have been indistinguishable from those of the lay inhabitants,<a href="#fn32" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref32" role="doc-noteref"><sup>32</sup></a> who would have shared, if Christian, the same church complex as their ascetic fellow villagers. The possibility that these hypothetical early apotactics (“renouncers”) might have adopted standard domestic arrangements, instead of living in buildings with a larger and more complex spatial configuration, might be related, in some instances, to the re-use, by the members of newly formed communities, of older, abandoned structures in villages or cities. According to his <em>Life</em>, the first community founded by Pachomius was in the abandoned village of Tabennesi in the Nile Valley, not deep in the desert.<a href="#fn33" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref33" role="doc-noteref"><sup>33</sup></a> As J. Goehring points out, how “deserted” this village was remains unclear.<a href="#fn34" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref34" role="doc-noteref"><sup>34</sup></a> At any rate, the other monasteries that came to be part of the Pachomian <em>koinonia</em> seem to have followed a similar pattern, although there is not enough archaeological or textual evidence to allow their precise identification: that is to say, if they were all located within or near villages of the fertile band of the Nile Valley or if any of them lay on the fringes of the desert.<a href="#fn35" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref35" role="doc-noteref"><sup>35</sup></a> Surely, some of the reasons for such a proximity to the Nile had to do with easy access to water, markets, and transportation.<a href="#fn36" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref36" role="doc-noteref"><sup>36</sup></a> With regard to the oases of the Western Desert, hundreds of miles away from the Nile Valley, communities (of any kind, not necessarily monastic) had to rely upon the availability of water from natural springs or wells dug deep into the ground. The site of ʿAin el-Gedida, with its ease of access to water and its proximity to a considerably bigger town such as Kellis, was an ideal location for any kind of settlement, including a monastery. One must acknowledge, however, that most of these arguments simply leave the possibility open that monks settled at ʿAin el-Gedida, rather than providing evidence for their presence on site at any given time.</p>
<p></p>
<p id="p26">
</p><div class="page-columns page-full"><p>The material evidence does not provide significant information in this regard, either. The ostraka that were collected during the excavations are not particularly enlightening on this issue, focused as they are for the most part on economic matters. One of them, though, is worthy of mention here. It was found in 2006, during the excavation of a midden filling room B4, located in the western half of mound I.<a href="#fn37" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref37" role="doc-noteref"><sup>37</sup></a> It is a complete ostrakon, made of a ceramic body sherd and of irregular shape, measuring approximately 10.3 by 9.8 cm. Nine lines of Coptic, parallel to the wheel marks, are written with black ink on its convex surface and were dated by Roger Bagnall and Dorota Dzierzbicka to the late fourth century CE, on the basis of palaeographic evidence and context. The ostrakon is a letter written by a certain <em>Apa</em> Alexandros, mentioned at the beginning of the first line, to another man concerning a third man (called Pesente) and his <em>pakton</em> (agreement or rent) and also naming a fourth man, i.e., <em>Apa</em> Kyros. Apart from its utilitarian content, this object is significant as the term <em>apa</em>, often used in a monastic context, might be suggestive of Alexandros and Kyros’ identification as monks. As stated by Bagnall and Dzierzbicka in their analysis of the ostrakon, although the term <em>apa</em> was also used for members of the regular clergy, the late fourth-century dating suggests that a monastic context is more probable.<a href="#fn38" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref38" role="doc-noteref"><sup>38</sup></a> At any rate, the significance of this ostrakon in the discussion on the possibly monastic nature of ʿAin el-Gedida is rather limited. The ostrakon was found in a domestic dump, within a deeply unreliable context, and we cannot be sure whether it was written at ʿAin el-Gedida, sent to someone there, or neither. No secure information exists on the identity of either Alexandros or Kyros or ether of the two other men mentioned in the text. Also, it is not possible to know, on the basis of the available data, who among the four men, if any, actually resided at ʿAin el-Gedida. The natural assumption would be that Alexandros lived somewhere else. Therefore, the ostrakon, although a suggestive piece of documentary evidence, cannot be used as proof of the existence of monks at the site in the fourth century. On the other hand, it is worth observing that an ostrakon from Kellis (<em>O. Kell</em>. 121) mentions in an account both an Alexandros and another man described as a monk (<em>monachos</em>, misspelled <em>monochos</em>).<a href="#fn39" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref39" role="doc-noteref"><sup>39</sup></a></p><div class="no-row-height column-margin column-container"><span class="margin-aside">p. 278</span></div></div>
<p></p>
<p id="p27">
</p><p>Other material evidence, more closely associated with the church complex, and this time undoubtedly <em>in situ</em>, consists of the graffiti drawn with black charcoal on the west and north walls of anteroom B6.<a href="#fn40" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref40" role="doc-noteref"><sup>40</sup></a> As mentioned in a previous chapter, they include a Greek inscription—a commonplace invocation to God—on the west wall and a Coptic one above several drawings on the north wall. The latter consist of a bird and three boats, motifs that can be found in Christian contexts at several sites in Egypt, including the Dakhla Oasis.<a href="#fn41" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref41" role="doc-noteref"><sup>41</sup></a> However, with particular reference to boats, it must be noted that their representation in graffiti is not evidence <em>per se</em> of a Christian environment. In fact, drawings of boats can be seen at several sites throughout the ancient world also in pre-Christian times.<a href="#fn42" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref42" role="doc-noteref"><sup>42</sup></a> Nonetheless, at least the Greek inscription on the west wall can be safely assigned to a Christian environment. At the same time, the contexts in which this typical formula is found do not always pertain to monasteries. Therefore, the graffiti of room B6, as well as the Coptic ostrakon from room B4, can hardly be used as evidence for the identification of ʿAin el-Gedida as a monastic site. It is true that the bulk of the Coptic texts from the fourth century found so far come from monastic communities, but Coptic was also in use in non-monastic contexts at Kellis: therefore, language is also not a decisive criterion.</p>
<p></p>
<p id="p28">
</p><div class="page-columns page-full"><p>On the whole, the available archaeological and documentary data do not point to an identification of ʿAin el-Gedida as a monastic settlement, built anew or developed on the remains of an earlier, non-monastic site. But it is fair to add that we lack indisputably monastic sites of the same period to which we could compare it. One could instead suggest, based on the current state of research, that the site was in fact a fourth-century settlement with an economy based mainly on the agricultural exploitation of the surrounding fields.<a href="#fn43" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref43" role="doc-noteref"><sup>43</sup></a> Evidence for Late Antique villages is not very abundant from the point of view of their archaeological investigation. Indeed, a considerable amount of data comes from the excavation of sites located mostly in the Fayyum. The village of Karanis is, in particular, a copious source of information about Egyptian villages up to Late Antiquity. Peasant settlements were less the object of investigation in other regions of Egypt, although a renewed interest in domestic architecture is slowly changing this balance.<a href="#fn44" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref44" role="doc-noteref"><sup>44</sup></a> On the other hand, documentary evidence abounds on fourth-century villages, shedding light on their economy, society, daily life, and their ties with the rest of the country, especially larger towns and cities.<a href="#fn45" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref45" role="doc-noteref"><sup>45</sup></a> R. Bagnall effectively analyzed the many facets of life in Egyptian villages of the fourth century, based on the information provided by written sources such as documents written on ostraka or papyrus, especially the archives of people involved in the management of land.<a href="#fn46" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref46" role="doc-noteref"><sup>46</sup></a></p><div class="no-row-height column-margin column-container"><span class="margin-aside">p. 279</span></div></div>
<p></p>
<p id="p29">
</p><p>Indeed, the picture that emerges from the documentary and, in part, the archaeological evidence is that of a dynamic world, deeply engaged in the economic, social, political affairs of the time, but also involved in religious matters. The link between asceticism and Egyptian villages, mentioned above, is only one example of the not-so-secondary role that the latter held in the overall organization of the country.</p>
<p></p>
<p id="p30">
</p><p>Sources, both archaeological and documentary, testify to a large number of villages spread throughout Egypt in the fourth century, with estimates of their numbers ranging between 2,000 and 2,500.<a href="#fn47" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref47" role="doc-noteref"><sup>47</sup></a> The size could vary considerably, but most of the rural settlements seem to have been smaller than 80 ha, which is the area calculated for Karanis, the most thoroughly investigated village.<a href="#fn48" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref48" role="doc-noteref"><sup>48</sup></a> An average of more than 1,200 people lived in these communities according to Bagnall, who emphasized how the differences could in fact be substantial.<a href="#fn49" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref49" role="doc-noteref"><sup>49</sup></a> It is impossible to make an estimate of the inhabitants of ʿAin el-Gedida in the fourth century, due to the lack of documentary or archaeological data on the full size of the settlement and especially because the residential area (or areas) have not yet been identified and excavated.</p>
<p></p>
<p id="p31">
</p><div class="page-columns page-full"><p>It is attested that villages had small industrial areas functionally related to agricultural activities, which played a primary role in the economy of Egyptian rural settlements.<a href="#fn50" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref50" role="doc-noteref"><sup>50</sup></a> One could usually find among the various buildings in a village granaries, pigeon houses, bakeries, and spaces to manufacture objects of daily use, for example pottery workshops, all located within a usually irregular spatial arrangement.<a href="#fn51" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref51" role="doc-noteref"><sup>51</sup></a> With regard to the archaeological evidence for ʿAin el-Gedida, all these features have been identified, although some of them only tentatively, on mound I: i.e., two large rooms with several bread ovens (rooms A6 and B15), a pigeon tower (the large rectangular room at the north end of the main hill), granaries (such as rooms A2–A4 in the southwest part), and a pottery workshop (the complex of rooms B17–B24 along the west edge of mound I).<a href="#fn52" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref52" role="doc-noteref"><sup>52</sup></a> Also, the spatial configuration of this area is noticeably irregular, mirroring a seemingly common standard of Egyptian rural settlements.<a href="#fn53" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref53" role="doc-noteref"><sup>53</sup></a> Furthermore, most of the ostraka gathered at ʿAin el-Gedida concern matters that reveal a world deeply linked to the agricultural exploitation of the land, a feature that is also distinctive, as just mentioned above, of a village-based economy. On the other hand, the fact that small-scale industrial installations, so typical of village life according to the sources, are present at the site does not necessarily confirm the identification of ʿAin el-Gedida as a standard rural settlement. Indeed, the archaeological evidence is not so abundant to allow comparative analysis to find what a “standard” village might have looked like. Furthermore, spaces destined to activities such as bread-baking or pottery-making were not exclusive features of villages, but could be found associated with other types of settlements, including those of a monastic nature. At any rate, the similarities shared by the archaeological data from ʿAin el-Gedida and the documentary sources about Egyptian villages deserve serious investigation, although it is worth pointing out again a glaring difference, namely that all village sites have readily identifiable houses, which is not the case at ʿAin el-Gedida, at least within the excavated and surveyed areas.</p><div class="no-row-height column-margin column-container"><span class="margin-aside">p. 280</span></div></div>
<p></p>
<p id="p32">
A strong female component was identified with regard to ʿAin el-Gedida, largely on the basis of material evidence, for example numerous fragments of bracelets found in almost all excavated contexts. Women were very visible in Egyptian villages of the fourth century, in some instances playing a considerable role in the social and economic life of that period.<a href="#fn54" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref54" role="doc-noteref"><sup>54</sup></a> This is another point of contact between what the documentary sources say about rural communities in Late Antique Egypt and what the archaeological evidence from ʿAin el-Gedida allows us to decipher about its society. However, not even a sizable female presence on site can be used to prove beyond doubt that ʿAin el-Gedida was an ordinary village, consisting of family units living in the proximity of a central industrial and religious center that was mound I.
</p>
<div class="page-columns page-full"><p id="p33">
In fact, rural settlements in fourth-century Egypt were not all villages. An alternative type consists of <em>epoikia</em>: that is to say, small rural centers associated with the management of large agricultural estates and often dependent on larger villages nearby.<a href="#fn55" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref55" role="doc-noteref"><sup>55</sup></a> The work-force could be employed, sometimes on a seasonal basis, to work the land under the direction of overseers, but tenancy could also be used to help supply the necessary labor. It is possible to suppose that the workers moved to the estate and lived there for the duration of their contract. The spatial arrangement of these <em>epoikia</em> is unknown, because none has ever been identified and excavated. On the basis of documentary evidence (<em>P.Mich.</em> 11.620), D. Rathbone reconstructed the possible appearance of an <em>epoikion</em>, which consisted of a complex of buildings functionally associated with the agricultural activities carried out in the farmstead.<a href="#fn56" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref56" role="doc-noteref"><sup>56</sup></a> It seems that Egyptian <em>epoikia</em> were created either as isolated entities, later developing in some cases into regular villages, or they were integrated, since their very beginnings, into pre-existing villages.<a href="#fn57" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref57" role="doc-noteref"><sup>57</sup></a> A fully communal life-style should not be necessarily implied for the people involved within the system of the <em>epoikia</em>. In fact, it cannot be ruled out that the wage-workers moved to these rural settlements with their families, occupying houses that may well not have differed substantially from those found in other types of settlements. At ʿAin el-Gedida, the south half of mound I might reflect the spatial arrangement of part of an <em>epoikion</em>, consisting not of its residential area but rather of a sector where the buildings more closely associated with agricultural activities were concentrated, including installations, such as bakeries, built to satisfy the needs of a relatively large community. The ceramic workshop, located along the western edge of the hill, would also fit within the context of a farmstead.<a href="#fn58" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref58" role="doc-noteref"><sup>58</sup></a> The existence of a church at the center of mound I, largely consisting of public spaces of a utilitarian nature, is not surprising in association with an <em>epoikion</em>. Indeed, written sources attest to the possibility that churches were associated with this type of rural settlement.<a href="#fn59" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref59" role="doc-noteref"><sup>59</sup></a> An ostrakon (inv. 830) found at the site acknowledges the payment of money by someone described as ἀπὸ γεωργ(ίου) Πμουν Βερρι, “from the <em>georgion</em> of Pmoun Berri,” the latter being (we may suppose) the likely name of ʿAin el-Gedida in the third century.<a href="#fn60" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref60" role="doc-noteref"><sup>60</sup></a> Here <em>georgion</em> should refer to a farmstead or agricultural settlement and, if indeed it refers to ʿAin el-Gedida, establish that as the basic nature of the place.<a href="#fn61" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref61" role="doc-noteref"><sup>61</sup></a>
</p><div class="no-row-height column-margin column-container"><span class="margin-aside">p. 281</span></div></div>
<p id="p34">
</p><p>Although not conclusively, the archaeological and documentary evidence points to a likely identification of ʿAin el-Gedida as an <em>epoikion</em>. Quite significantly, small rural hamlets of this type (i.e., depending on large agricultural estates) have been known in Egypt, until now, only from documentary sources. Thus, if ʿAin el-Gedida is to be interpreted as an <em>epoikion</em>, it may offer the first archaeological evidence for this type of settlement, as well as more broadly shedding new light on the study of rural economy in Late Antique Egypt.</p>
<p></p>
<p id="p35">
</p><div class="page-columns page-full"><p>In 2006, the discovery of a Greek ostrakon (inv. 9) from mound I opened the discussion about the nature of the site to another possible interpretation. The sherd, found during the excavation of the domestic dump in room B4, is a receipt, dated to the fourth century, for the payment of eight artabas of barley.<a href="#fn62" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref62" role="doc-noteref"><sup>62</sup></a> It is significant in this context because it mentions that the amount was paid for the annona of mounted archers, who formed a military corps of the Roman army, on duty at Mothis, the capital of the oasis since the fourth century. Further information came from another Greek ostrakon (inv. 660) found in 2008.<a href="#fn63" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref63" role="doc-noteref"><sup>63</sup></a> The sherd, broken into three pieces and incomplete, was found within an ash layer filling room B11, the vaulted passageway running along the south wall of the church. The ostrakon, which consists of three lines written in black ink, is datable to the mid-to-late fourth century, based on handwriting and context. The inscription records a certain Joseph as the signatory of a receipt for two artabas of wheat and includes the mention, in the genitive case, of a <em>praepositus</em>. According to Bagnall and Dzierzbicka, the term <em>praepositus</em> could refer to the governor of a rural district, a subdivision of a nome (the <em>praepositus pagi</em>), or, more likely in this case, the leader of the <em>ala</em> (military unit) stationed in Dakhla.</p><div class="no-row-height column-margin column-container"><span class="margin-aside">p. 282</span></div></div>
<p></p>
<p id="p36">
Archaeological and documentary evidence from Dakhla testifies to a number of military settlements in the oasis during Late Antiquity.<a href="#fn64" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref64" role="doc-noteref"><sup>64</sup></a> In particular, archaeological investigations carried out, in recent years, at the site of El-Qasr, to the northwest of ʿAin el-Gedida, added new and significant data in this regard. Researchers found, under the remains of the Islamic settlement and partially incorporated into them, consistent traces of a Roman <em>castrum</em>, or fort, whose excavation began in recent years.<a href="#fn65" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref65" role="doc-noteref"><sup>65</sup></a> Written sources attest that besides the <em>castra</em>, built in towns, villages, and other strategically relevant areas, the country was dotted with smaller military outposts depending on the main forts.<a href="#fn66" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref66" role="doc-noteref"><sup>66</sup></a> Smaller military units were detached there, allowing military control over large areas.<a href="#fn67" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref67" role="doc-noteref"><sup>67</sup></a> But no substantial archaeological evidence exists to support the identification of ʿAin el-Gedida as one of these outposts. The ostrakon mentioning the military <em>praepositus</em> might be originally from a context that is not directly associated with ʿAin el-Gedida or refer only to a visit. No traces of outer walls or any sort of fortifications, which one can assume might have existed to secure a military station, were detected during the 2006– 2008 excavations and survey of the entire area. The rectangular building located in the north half of mound I, measuring roughly 16 m north–south by 12 m east–west, probably was not a military fortification that could have been used for the defense of the outpost and as a vantage point to inspect the surrounding area. Indeed, as discussed above, it seems more likely that it was, in fact, a <em>columbarium</em> or pigeon tower, whose presence in villages of Late Antique Egypt is attested to by substantial evidence, including within the Dakhla Oasis.
</p>
<div class="page-columns page-full"><p id="p37">
The existence of a church would not go, <em>per se</em>, against the identification of ʿAin el-Gedida as a military settlement. Indeed, the Christian affiliation of Roman soldiers is attested to not only in Egypt, but also in other regions of the ancient Mediterranean world, even before the fourth century.<a href="#fn68" class="footnote-ref" id="fnref68" role="doc-noteref"><sup>68</sup></a> However, the possibility that ʿAin el-Gedida was associated with installations of a military nature and function seems remote. Indeed, the irregular arrangement of most buildings on mound I strongly differs from the carefully planned layout of military camps. Furthermore, the mentioned lack of evidence of fortifications would be puzzling, as it is hard to believe that they would have completely disappeared.
</p><div class="no-row-height column-margin column-container"><span class="margin-aside">p. 283</span></div></div>
<p id="p38">
</p><p>Although not providing evidence that a military detachment resided permanently at ʿAin el-Gedida (indeed, one of the two ostraka mentioned earlier, inv. 9, states that the mounted archers were stationed at Mothis), the content of the two ostraka is, nonetheless, suggestive of, at least, some form of interaction between the army and individuals at ʿAin el-Gedida, if only in the payment of taxes.</p>
<p></p>
</section>
<section id="epilogue" class="level2 page-columns page-full" data-number="7.3">
<h2 data-number="7.3" class="anchored" data-anchor-id="epilogue"><span class="header-section-number">7.3</span> Epilogue</h2>
<p id="p39">
</p><p>The aim of the excavation project of ʿAin el-Gedida was, from its early conception, to carry out a scientifically rigorous and comprehensive investigation of the site, which had raised, since the Egyptian excavations of the mid-1990s, stimulating questions pertaining to the singularity of its layout and architectural features. The peculiar nature of this venture, which enjoyed the productive collaboration of Egyptian and foreign members and specialists, allowed a particularly intense and rich process of study and interpretation. Different hypotheses were shared and tested in the field, against all the available evidence, in order to try to provide suitable answers to all the issues at stake.</p>
<p></p>
<p id="p40">
</p><p>Indeed, three seasons of archaeological investigation at ʿAin el-Gedida provided a wealth of archaeological evidence that went beyond any expectation, shedding light on several aspects of life at the site in the fourth century. Highly exciting was the discovery of a ceramic workshop that had been built within the remains of an earlier temple, whose identification is fairly secure. Not only did this find generate new data on local ceramic-production processes; it also added significantly to our knowledge of the profound changes that the adoption of Christianity brought to the physical, social, and religious landscape of rural Egypt in Late Antiquity. Quite significantly in this respect, another highlight of the project was the discovery of the church and the complex of rooms associated with it. Not only did the church, along with the gathering hall to the north, prove to be one of the earliest examples of Christian architecture discovered thus far anywhere in Egypt. It also testified to an original layout, which partially borrowed standard forms but, at the same time, elaborated them in an uncharacteristic way, closely paralleled only by the Small East Church at the nearby site of Kellis. The study of its construction process led to the identification of different phases, which involved the reuse of earlier structures into the new building. It also revealed the alterations brought to the church complex after its completion, affecting not only its spatial arrangement but also the function of some rooms.</p>
<p></p>
<p id="p41">
</p><div class="page-columns page-full"><p>The discovery of the church complex raised considerable interest among scholars for other reasons, which extended beyond its early date and unusual plan. First, it provided significant additional evidence for the flourishing of Christianity in the Dakhla Oasis since at least the early part of the fourth century CE. Although geographically isolated and far from the Nile Valley, the oasis proved to be the location of vibrant communities, exposed to a variety of new ideas, and associated life-styles, that were dramatically changing the ancient world. The archaeological remains of ʿAin el-Gedida testify to a profoundly Christianized society, whose public life centered around the church complex, built in a key spot on the main hill of the site. The evidence from ʿAin el-Gedida supplements that from other settlements in the oasis and, in particular, from Kellis, with which, due to their proximity and similar chronology, strong economic and administrative links certainly existed. Both sites, which did not experience later phases of occupation than the late fourth century CE, have provided substantial information on the earliest known types adopted by Christian architecture, not only in the region of the Western Desert but, at least until now, throughout Egypt. Furthermore, the evidence from Kellis and ʿAin el-Gedida is significant because it allows the possibility of establishing comparative analysis between Christian archaeology in Egypt and the early evidence from other regions of the Mediterranean world. The value of this investigation lies in the opportunity of reconstructing how architectural forms and types travelled with people and were adopted, sometimes rearranged in peculiar ways, in provinces that were geographically distant from each other, although not so at other levels.</p><div class="no-row-height column-margin column-container"><span class="margin-aside">p. 284</span></div></div>
<p></p>
<p id="p42">
As discussed above, several questions about ʿAin el-Gedida, <em>in primis</em> about its nature, have yet to receive a conclusive and unequivocal answer, although the archaeological and documentary evidence seems to point more strongly toward an identification of the site as an <em>epoikion</em>. Also, issues of the origins and, at the opposite end of the chronological spectrum, of the abandonment of the site are still debated. Undoubtedly, the full archaeological investigation of the site, including the unexcavated sectors of mound I and the surrounding hills, would provide much needed information on the original extent of the settlement and its overall spatial configuration, especially on the location of the domestic quarters. Hoping for a full-scale and comprehensive investigation of the site of ʿAin el-Gedida is, particularly during this period of political instability for the region, close to wishful thinking. Nevertheless, the information that was gathered is far from being inconclusive. It testifies to a vibrant rural community that settled at ʿAin el-Gedida and was certainly very active in the fourth century. It had well adapted itself to the local environment, exploiting what the surrounding land had to offer and storing the products on site. The small industrial establishments investigated on mound I shed light on a society whose involvement in the local economy extended beyond working in the fields. People crafted pottery, raised pigeons, and baked bread in large open-air spaces. Most likely, other productive activities were carried out on site, whose evidence lies beneath the sand of the desert and waits to be discovered. Like their fellow neighbors at Kellis, these people were also a profoundly Christianized society. This is testified to, for the most part, by the church complex, strategically built at the center of the main hill and, undoubtedly, a preeminent landmark of the local physical environment. The existence of villagers still practicing paganism at the site cannot be ruled out. However, the fact that the temple of ʿAin el-Gedida, located near the church, had been turned into a ceramic workshop by (at the latest) the early fourth century suggests that, if pagans lived at the site at that time, certainly their numbers must no longer have been substantial. If the inhabitants of ʿAin el-Gedida, both Christians and pagans, were in fact villagers or wage-workers and tenants of an <em>epoikion</em>, and if they included ascetics living as a community in a rural environment, this is yet to be known beyond doubt.
</p>
</section>
<section id="notes" class="level2" data-number="7.4">
<h2 data-number="7.4" class="anchored" data-anchor-id="notes"><span class="header-section-number">7.4</span> Notes</h2>
<!-- Harlow and Smith 2001 not in bibliography -->
<div id="refs" class="references csl-bib-body hanging-indent" data-entry-spacing="0" role="list" style="display: none">
<div id="ref-adams_2008" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Adams, Edward. 2008. <span>“The Ancient Church at Megiddo: The Discovery and an Assessment of Its Significance.”</span> <em>The Expository Times</em> 120: 62–69.
</div>
<div id="ref-alleaume_1999" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Alleaume, Ghislaine. 1999. <span>“An Industrial Revolution in Agriculture? Some Observations on the Evolution of Rural Egypt in the Nineteenth Century.”</span> In Bowman and Rogan 1999: 331–45.
</div>
<div id="ref-ast_bagnall_2015" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Ast, Rodney, and Roger S. Bagnall. 2015. <span>“New <span>Evidence</span> for the <span>Roman</span> <span>Garrison</span> of <span>Trimithis</span>.”</span> <em>Tyche</em> 30: 1–4.
</div>
<div id="ref-aubert_1995" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Aubert, J. J. 1995. <span>“Policing the Countryside: Soldiers and Civilians in Egyptian Villages in the Third and the Fourth Centuries AD.”</span> In Le Bohec 1995: 257–65.
</div>
<div id="ref-bagnall_1985a" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Bagnall, Roger S. 1985. <span>“Agricultural Productivity and Taxation in Later Roman Egypt.”</span> <em>Transactions of the American Philological Association</em> 115: 289–308.
</div>
<div id="ref-bagnall_1992" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
———. 1992. <span>“Landholding in Late Roman Egypt: The Distribution of Wealth.”</span> <em>Journal of Religion and Society</em> 82: 128–49.
</div>
<div id="ref-bagnall_1993" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
———. 1993. <em>Egypt in <span>Late</span> <span>Antiquity</span></em>. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
</div>
<div id="ref-bagnall_2001" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
———. 2001. <span>“Archaeological Work on Hellenistic and Roman Egypt, 1995–2000.”</span> <em>American Journal of Archaeology</em> 105 (2): 227–43.
</div>
<div id="ref-bagnall_2005" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
———. 2005. <span>“Village and City: Geographies of Power in Byzantine Egypt.”</span> In Lefort, Morrisson, and Sodini 2005: 553–65.
</div>
<div id="ref-bagnall_etal_2015" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Bagnall, Roger S., Nicola Aravecchia, Raffaella Cribiore, Paola Davoli, Olaf E. Kaper, and Susanna McFadden, eds. 2015. <em>An <span>Oasis</span> <span>City</span></em>. New York: ISAW/NYU Press. <a href="https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479818716.001.0001">https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479818716.001.0001</a>.
</div>
<div id="ref-bagnall_cribiore_2006" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Bagnall, Roger S., and Raffaella Cribiore. 2006. <em>Women’s Letters from Ancient Egypt, 300 BC–AD 800</em>. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
</div>
<div id="ref-bagnall_davoli_2011" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Bagnall, Roger S., and Paola Davoli. 2011. <span>“Archaeological Work on Hellenistic and Roman Egypt, 2000–2009.”</span> <em>American Journal of Archaeology</em> 115 (1): 103–57.
</div>
<div id="ref-bagnall_rathbone_2004" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Bagnall, Roger S., and Dominic W. Rathbone, eds. 2004. <em>Egypt from <span>Alexander</span> to the <span>Early Christians</span>. <span>An Archaeological</span> and <span>Historical Guide</span></em>. Los Angeles: The J. Paul Getty Museum.
</div>
<div id="ref-banaji_1999" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Banaji, Jairus. 1999. <span>“Agrarian History and the Labour Organisation of Byzantine Large Estates.”</span> In Bowman and Rogan 1999: 193–216.
</div>
<div id="ref-banaji_2007" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
———. 2007. <em>Agrarian Change in Late Antiquity: Gold, Labour, and Aristocratic Dominance</em>. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
</div>
<div id="ref-bayoumi_1998" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Bayoumi, Kamel A. 1998. <span>“Excavations at ‘<span>Ain</span> <span class="nocase">al</span> <span>Gadida</span> in the <span>Dakhleh</span> <span>Oasis</span>.”</span> In Kaper 1998: 55–62.
</div>
<div id="ref-binder_1978" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Binder, Leonard. 1978. <em>In a Moment of Enthusiasm: Political Power and the Second Stratum in Egypt</em>. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
</div>
<div id="ref-boozer_2007" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Boozer, Anna L. 2007. <span>“Housing <span>Empire</span>: <span>The</span> <span>Archaeology</span> of <span>Daily</span> <span>Life</span> in <span>Roman</span> <span>Amheida</span>, <span>Egypt</span>.”</span> Ph.D. Dissertation, Columbia University.
</div>
<div id="ref-boozer_2015" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
———, ed. 2015. <em>A <span>Late</span> <span>Romano</span>-<span>Egyptian</span> <span>House</span> in the <span>Dakhla</span> <span>Oasis</span>: <span>Amheida</span> <span>House</span> <span>B2</span>. Amheida II</em>. New York: New York University Press & Institute for the Study of the Ancient World.
</div>
<div id="ref-bowen_2001a" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Bowen, Gillian E. 2001. <span>“A Suggested Interpretation of the Coin-Finds of Ismant El-Kharab.”</span> In Marlow and Mills 2001: 60–64.
</div>
<div id="ref-bowen_2002a" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
———. 2002. <span>“Fourth Century Churches at <span class="nocase">Ismant el-Kharab</span>.”</span> In Hope and Bowen 2002: 65–85.
</div>
<div id="ref-bowen_2003a" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
———. 2003. <span>“The <span>Small</span> <span>East</span> <span>Church</span> at <span>Ismant</span> <span class="nocase">el-Kharab</span>.”</span> In Bowen and Hope 2003: 153–65.
</div>
<div id="ref-bowen_2007" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
———. 2007. <span>“Ismant El-Kharab, Ancient Kellis, in the Dakhleh Oasis.”</span> <em>The Numismatic Chronicle</em> 167: 260–63.
</div>
<div id="ref-bowman_2013" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Bowman, Alan K. 2013. <span>“Agricultural Production in Roman Egypt.”</span> In Bowman and Wilson 2013: 219–53.
</div>
<div id="ref-bowman_rogan_1999" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Bowman, Alan K., and Eugene Rogan, eds. 1999. <em>Agriculture in Egypt from Pharaonic to Modern Times</em>. New York: Oxford University Press for the British Academy.
</div>
<div id="ref-brookshedstrom_2017" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Brooks Hedstrom, Darlene L. 2017. <em>The <span>Monastic Landscape</span> of <span>Late Antique Egypt</span>: <span>An Archaeological Reconstruction</span></em>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
</div>
<div id="ref-carrie_1974" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Carrié, Jean-Michel. 1974. <span>“Les <em>Castra Dionysiados</em> et l’évolution de l’architecture militaire romaine tardive.”</span> <em>Mélanges de l’École Française de Rome. Antiquité</em> 86: 819–50.
</div>
<div id="ref-carrie_1977" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
———. 1977. <span>“Le rôle économique de l’armée dans l’Égypte romaine.”</span> In <em>Armées et fiscalité dans le monde antique</em> 1977: 373–93.
</div>
<div id="ref-carrie_1986" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
———. 1986. <span>“L’esercito: trasformazioni funzionali ed economie locali.”</span> In Giardina 1986: 449-88; 760-71.
</div>
<div id="ref-dixneuf_2012" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Dixneuf, Delphine. 2012. <span>“Ceramics from <span>ʿAin</span> El-<span>Gedida</span>, <span>Dakhleh Oasis</span>: <span>Preliminary Results</span>.”</span> In Bagnall, Davoli, and Hope 2012: 459–70.
</div>
<div id="ref-dunsmore_2002" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Dunsmore, A. 2002. <span>“Ceramics from Ismant El-Kharab.”</span> In Hope and Bowen 2002: 129–42.
</div>
<div id="ref-gardner_2012" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Gardner, Iain. 2012. <span>“Coptic Ostraka from <span>Qasr <span class="nocase">al-Dakhleh</span></span>.”</span> In Bagnall, Davoli, and Hope 2012: 391–408.
</div>
<div id="ref-goehring_1999" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Goehring, James E. 1999. <em>Ascetics, Society, and the Desert: Studies in Egyptian Monasticism</em>. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International.
</div>
<div id="ref-grenfell_hunt_1907" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Grenfell, Bernard P., and Arthur S. Hunt. 1907. <em>The Tebtunis Papyri: Part II</em>. London: Henry Frowde.
</div>
<div id="ref-hickey_2007" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Hickey, Todd M. 2007. <span>“Aristocratic Landholding and the Economy of Byzantine Egypt.”</span> In Bagnall 2007: 288–308.
</div>
<div id="ref-hickey_2012" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
———. 2012. <em>Wine, Wealth, and the State in Late Antique Egypt: The House of Apion at Oxyrhynchus</em>. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
</div>
<div id="ref-hope_1999b" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Hope, Colin A. 1999. <span>“Reports from the <span>Survey</span> of the <span>Dakhleh</span> <span>Oasis</span> <span>Western</span> <span>Desert</span> of <span>Egypt</span>, 1977–1987.”</span> In Churcher and Mills 1999: 215–43.
</div>
<div id="ref-hope_2002" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
———. 2002. <span>“Excavations in the Settlement of Ismant <span class="nocase">el-Kharab</span> in 1995–1999.”</span> In Hope and Bowen 2002: 167–208.
</div>
<div id="ref-hope_2003" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
———. 2003. <span>“The Excavations at Ismant <span class="nocase">el-<span>Kharab</span></span> from 2000 to 2002.”</span> In Bowen and Hope 2003: 207–89.
</div>
<div id="ref-keenan_2007" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Keenan, James G. 2007. <span>“Byzantine Egyptian Villages.”</span> In Bagnall 2007: 226–43.
</div>
<div id="ref-konstantinidis_2015" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Konstantinidis, Giorgios. 2015. <span>“A Reconsideration of <em>Epoikion</em> in Byzantine Egypt.”</span> <em>Byzantiaka</em> 32: 23–38.
</div>
<div id="ref-kucera_2012" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Kucera, Paul. 2012. <span>“<span class="nocase">al</span> Qasr: <span>The</span> <span>Roman</span> <em>Castrum</em> of <span>Dakhleh Oasis</span>.”</span> In Bagnall, Davoli, and Hope 2012: 305–16.
</div>
<div id="ref-layton_2002" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Layton, Bentley. 2002. <span>“Social Structure and Food Consumption in an Early Christian Monastery: The Evidence of Shenoute’s <em>Canons</em> and the White Monastery Federation <span>A.D.</span> 385–465.”</span> <em>Le Muséon</em> 115 (1): 25–55.
</div>
<div id="ref-lewuillonblume_1979" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Lewuillon-Blume, Marianne. 1979. <span>“Problèmes de la terre au IVe siècle après J.-C.”</span> In Bingen and Nachtergael 1979: IV:177–85.
</div>
<div id="ref-lozach_hug_1930" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Lozach, J., and G. Hug. 1930. <em>L’habitat rural en Égypte</em>. Cairo: Imprimerie de l’Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale du Caire pour la Société Royale de Géographie d’Egypte.
</div>
<div id="ref-marchand_2014" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Marchand, Sylvie. 2014. <span>“Inventaire archéologique des sites de production céramique du prédynastique à l’époque moderne. Égypte et Basse-Nubie.”</span> <em>Bulletin de la Céramique Égyptienne</em> 24: 201–24.
</div>
<div id="ref-mazza_2001" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Mazza, Roberta. 2001. <em>L’archivio degli Apioni: terra, lavoro e proprietà senatoria nell’Egitto tardoantico</em>. Bari: Edipuglia.
</div>
<div id="ref-palme_2007" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Palme, Bernhard. 2007. <span>“The Imperial Presence: Government and Army.”</span> In Bagnall 2007: 244–70.
</div>
<div id="ref-putzeys_2007" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Putzeys, Toon. 2007. <span>“Productive Space in Late Antiquity.”</span> In Lavan, Swift, and Putzeys 2007: 63–80.
</div>
<div id="ref-rathbone_1991" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Rathbone, Dominic. 1991. <em>Economic Rationalism and Rural Society in Third-Century <span>A.D.</span> Egypt: The Heroninos Archive and the Appianus Estate</em>. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
</div>
<div id="ref-redde_2004" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Reddé, Michel, ed. 2004. <em>Kysis: Fouilles de l’Ifao à Douch, Oasis de Kharga, 1985–1990</em>. Cairo: Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale.
</div>
<div id="ref-remondon_1955" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Rémondon, Roger. 1955. <span>“Problèmes militaires en Égypte et dans l’Empire à la fin du IVe siècle.”</span> <em>Revista de Historia</em> 213: 21–38.
</div>
<div id="ref-remondon_1965" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
———. 1965. <span>“Militaires et civils dans une campagne égyptienne au temps de Constance II.”</span> <em>Journal des Savants</em> 1965: 132–43.
</div>
<div id="ref-rodziewicz_1987" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Rodziewicz, Mieczysław. 1987. <span>“Introduction à la céramique à engobe rouge de Kharga, Kharga Red Slip Ware.”</span> <em>Cahiers de la Céramique Égyptienne</em> 1: 123–36.
</div>
<div id="ref-sarris_2004" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Sarris, Peter. 2004. <span>“The Origins of the Manorial Economy: New Insights from Late Antiquity.”</span> <em>English Historical Review</em> 119: 279–311.
</div>
<div id="ref-schwartz_etal_1969" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Schwartz, Jacques, A. Badawy, R. Smith, and H. Wild. 1969. <em>Qasr-Qarun/Dionysias 1950</em>. Cairo: Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale.
</div>
<div id="ref-springborg_1982" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Springborg, Robert. 1982. <em>Family, Power, and Politics in Egypt: Sayed Bey Marei–His Clan, Clients, and Cohorts</em>. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
</div>
<div id="ref-szymanska_babraj_2006" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Szymańska, Hanna, and Krzysztof Babraj. 2006. <span>“Polish Excavations in the Basilica at Marea (Egypt).”</span> <em>Bulletin de La Societe d’Archeologie Copte</em> 45: 107–17. plates XI–XIII.
</div>
<div id="ref-szymanska_babraj_2007" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
———. 2007. <span>“Marea on Lake Maryut.”</span> In Laskowska-Kusztal 2007: 159–70.
</div>
<div id="ref-tepper_2006" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Tepper, Yotam. 2006. <span>“Legio, Kefar ‘Otnay.”</span> <em>Hadashot Arkheologiyot: Excavations and Surveys in Israel</em> 118: (no pagination). On–line resource: <a href="http://www.hadashot-esi.org.il/report_detail_eng.aspx?id=363">http://www.hadashot-esi.org.il/report_detail_eng.aspx?id=363</a>.
</div>
<div id="ref-tepper_di_segni_2006" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Tepper, Yotam, and Lea Di Segni. 2006. <em>A Christian Prayer Hall of the Third Century CE at Kefar ‘Othnay (Legio). Excavations at the Megiddo Prison 2005</em>. Jerusalem: Israel Antiquities Authority.
</div>
<div id="ref-veilleux_1980" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Veilleux, Armand, transl. 1980. <em>The Bohairic Life of Pachomius</em>. Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications.
</div>
<div id="ref-wilfong_1999" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Wilfong, Terry G. 1999. <em>Women of Jeme. Lives in a Coptic Town in Late Antique Egypt</em>. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
</div>
<div id="ref-wilfong_2007" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
———. 2007. <span>“Gender and Society in Byzantine Egypt.”</span> In Bagnall 2007: 309–27.
</div>
<div id="ref-winlock_1936" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Winlock, Herbert E. 1936. <em>Ed <span>Dakhleh</span> <span>Oasis</span>. <span>Journal</span> of a <span>Camel</span> <span>Trip</span> <span>Made</span> in 1908</em>. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art.
</div>
<div id="ref-wipszycka_2009" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Wipszycka, Ewa. 2009. <em>Moines et communautés monastiques en <span>Égypte</span>. IVe–VIIIe siècles</em>. Warsaw: JJP Supplement, Volume 11.
</div>
<div id="ref-worp_1994" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
Worp, Klaas A. 1994. <span>“The <em>Notitia Dignitatum</em> and the Geography of Egypt.”</span> In Bülow-Jacobsen 1994: 463–69.
</div>
<div id="ref-worp_2004" class="csl-entry" role="listitem">
———, ed. 2004. <em>Greek Ostraka from Kellis: O. Kellis, Nos. 1–293</em>. Oxford: Oxbow Books.
</div>
</div>
</section>
<section id="footnotes" class="footnotes footnotes-end-of-document" role="doc-endnotes">
<hr>
<ol>
<li id="fn1"><p>Sometimes as a result of the excavation of test trenches throughout the mound.<a href="#fnref1" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn2"><p>See <a href="6_west-complex.html#sec-6.7" class="quarto-xref"><span>Section 6.7</span></a>.<a href="#fnref2" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn3"><p><span class="citation" data-cites="bagnall_1993">Bagnall <a href="references.html#ref-bagnall_1993" role="doc-biblioref">1993: 264</a></span>. About a possible Ptolemaic date for some similar mud-brick temples in Dakhla, see the discussion in <a href="6_west-complex.html#sec-6.7" class="quarto-xref"><span>Section 6.7</span></a> of this volume, in particular pp. 265-67.<a href="#fnref3" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn4"><p><span class="citation" data-cites="bowen_2007">Bowen <a href="references.html#ref-bowen_2007" role="doc-biblioref">2007: 263</a></span>.<a href="#fnref4" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn5"><p>Which, in fact, reinforces the dating established for the site through the numismatic evidence. Also, the lack of later material in disturbed contexts, for example following the excavation of pits, suggests a relatively short time span for the occurrence of these ancient disturbances.<a href="#fnref5" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn6"><p>Although, as mentioned earlier on, this possibility cannot be ruled out.<a href="#fnref6" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn7"><p><span class="citation" data-cites="bowen_2002a">Bowen <a href="references.html#ref-bowen_2002a" role="doc-biblioref">2002: 81</a></span>.<a href="#fnref7" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn8"><p><span class="citation" data-cites="bowen_2003a">Bowen <a href="references.html#ref-bowen_2003a" role="doc-biblioref">2003: 164</a></span>.<a href="#fnref8" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn9"><p>See <a href="./9_coins.html">Chapter 9</a> of this volume.<a href="#fnref9" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn10"><p>See <span class="citation" data-cites="dixneuf_2012">Dixneuf <a href="references.html#ref-dixneuf_2012" role="doc-biblioref">2012</a></span> and <a href="./8_la-ceramique.html">Chapter 8</a> of this volume.<a href="#fnref10" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn11"><p>This is significant, since Kellis seems to have been abandoned by about 400, and many contexts at Kellis have their last material from the 360s, suggesting that the last few decades of the century may have been vestigial. Indeed, according to R. Bagnall, only two consular dates in <em>P.Kellis</em> 1 are securely dated after 369, with the possible addition of a third one (personal communication, February 2011).<a href="#fnref11" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn12"><p>See <span class="citation" data-cites="hope_1999b">Hope <a href="references.html#ref-hope_1999b" role="doc-biblioref">1999</a></span> and <span class="citation" data-cites="dunsmore_2002">Dunsmore <a href="references.html#ref-dunsmore_2002" role="doc-biblioref">2002</a></span>.<a href="#fnref12" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn13"><p>See <span class="citation" data-cites="rodziewicz_1987">Rodziewicz <a href="references.html#ref-rodziewicz_1987" role="doc-biblioref">1987</a></span>.<a href="#fnref13" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn14"><p>See <a href="./8_la-ceramique.html">Chapter 8</a> of this volume.<a href="#fnref14" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn15"><p>Particularly in room A25, whose disturbed floor context had been left partially unexcavated in the mid-1990s.<a href="#fnref15" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn16"><p>No evidence was found of imports from the Mediterranean region; see <span class="citation" data-cites="dixneuf_2012">Dixneuf <a href="references.html#ref-dixneuf_2012" role="doc-biblioref">2012: 469</a></span>.<a href="#fnref16" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn17"><p>See <span class="citation" data-cites="dixneuf_2012">Dixneuf <a href="references.html#ref-dixneuf_2012" role="doc-biblioref">2012</a></span>. See also <a href="./8_la-ceramique.html">Chapter 8</a> in this volume.<a href="#fnref17" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn18"><p>Although some of the ceramic types chronologically extend into the fifth c. CE.<a href="#fnref18" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn19"><p>See <a href="./8_la-ceramique.html">Chapter 8</a> of this volume.<a href="#fnref19" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn20"><p>See <a href="./10_ostraka-and-graffiti.html">Chapter 10</a> of this volume: for the third-century ostrakon, cf. cat. no. <a href="./10_ostraka-and-graffiti.html#ost-9">9</a> (pp. 524–26 in print edition).<a href="#fnref20" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn21"><p>See <a href="./11_miscellaneous-objects.html">Chapter 11</a> of this volume.<a href="#fnref21" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn22"><p>For Kellis, see <span class="citation" data-cites="bowen_2002a">Bowen <a href="references.html#ref-bowen_2002a" role="doc-biblioref">2002</a></span> and <span class="citation" data-cites="hope_2003">Hope <a href="references.html#ref-hope_2003" role="doc-biblioref">2003</a></span>. Concerning Amheida, see <span class="citation" data-cites="boozer_2007">Boozer <a href="references.html#ref-boozer_2007" role="doc-biblioref">2007</a></span>; <span class="citation" data-cites="boozer_2015">Boozer <a href="references.html#ref-boozer_2015" role="doc-biblioref">2015</a></span> and the excavation reports available on-line at: <a href="https://isaw.nyu.edu/research/amheida/reports">https://isaw.nyu.edu/research/amheida/reports</a>.<a href="#fnref22" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn23"><p><span class="citation" data-cites="bowen_2007">Bowen <a href="references.html#ref-bowen_2007" role="doc-biblioref">2007: 260</a></span>. On the numismatic evidence dating the abandonment of Kellis, see <span class="citation" data-cites="bowen_2001a">Bowen <a href="references.html#ref-bowen_2001a" role="doc-biblioref">2001: 63–64</a></span>.<a href="#fnref23" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn24"><p>However, there is evidence that some sites of the oasis, such as Deir Abu Matta and El-Qasr, continued to be occupied after the end of the fourth century.<a href="#fnref24" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn25"><p><span class="citation" data-cites="redde_2004">Reddé <a href="references.html#ref-redde_2004" role="doc-biblioref">2004: 56</a></span>.<a href="#fnref25" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn26"><p><span class="citation" data-cites="hope_2002">Hope <a href="references.html#ref-hope_2002" role="doc-biblioref">2002: 173, 186</a></span>.<a href="#fnref26" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn27"><p><span class="citation" data-cites="bagnall_etal_2015">Bagnall et al. <a href="references.html#ref-bagnall_etal_2015" role="doc-biblioref">2015: 89</a></span>.<a href="#fnref27" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn28"><p><span class="citation" data-cites="bayoumi_1998">Bayoumi <a href="references.html#ref-bayoumi_1998" role="doc-biblioref">1998: 57–62</a></span>. The excavations also extended, although partially, to the central sector of the hill, leading to the discovery of the gathering hall (room A46); its connection with a larger complex, however, remained unnoticed at that time. See <span class="citation" data-cites="brookshedstrom_2017">Brooks Hedstrom <a href="references.html#ref-brookshedstrom_2017" role="doc-biblioref">2017</a></span> on the archaeology of Late Antique monasteries in Egypt. On the phenomenon of early Egyptian monasticism, see, among others, <span class="citation" data-cites="wipszycka_2009">Wipszycka <a href="references.html#ref-wipszycka_2009" role="doc-biblioref">2009</a></span>.<a href="#fnref28" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn29"><p>Such as rooms A2–A4 in the southwest corner of mound I. On room A2, see <a href="2_survey.html#sec-2.1.1" class="quarto-xref"><span>Section 2.1.1</span></a> in this volume, particularly pp. 42–45, pls. 2.5–7 (<a href="2_survey.html#plt-2.5" class="quarto-xref">Plate <span>2.5</span></a>, <a href="2_survey.html#plt-2.6" class="quarto-xref">Plate <span>2.6</span></a>, <a href="2_survey.html#plt-2.7" class="quarto-xref">Plate <span>2.7</span></a>).<a href="#fnref29" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn30"><p><span class="citation" data-cites="bayoumi_1998">Bayoumi <a href="references.html#ref-bayoumi_1998" role="doc-biblioref">1998: 58</a></span>.<a href="#fnref30" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn31"><p>See the discussion in <a href="5_church-complex.html#sec-5.1" class="quarto-xref"><span>Section 5.1</span></a> of this volume, particularly pp. 209–10. On the issue of food consumption in a monastic environment, based on written sources, see Harlow and Smith 2001 and <span class="citation" data-cites="layton_2002">Layton <a href="references.html#ref-layton_2002" role="doc-biblioref">2002</a></span>.<a href="#fnref31" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn32"><p>Making it particularly difficult to recognize the nature of any of these buildings as “monastic”.<a href="#fnref32" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn33"><p><span class="citation" data-cites="veilleux_1980">Veilleux <a href="references.html#ref-veilleux_1980" role="doc-biblioref">1980: 17</a></span>.<a href="#fnref33" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn34"><p>Possibly it was only partially abandoned and the monks settled in the buildings that had been left empty by their previous owners: see <span class="citation" data-cites="goehring_1999">Goehring <a href="references.html#ref-goehring_1999" role="doc-biblioref">1999: 97</a></span>. On the overall economic situation of Egyptian villages and the reasons for their possible abandonment, see <span class="citation" data-cites="bagnall_1993">Bagnall <a href="references.html#ref-bagnall_1993" role="doc-biblioref">1993: 144</a></span>.<a href="#fnref34" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn35"><p><span class="citation" data-cites="goehring_1999">Goehring <a href="references.html#ref-goehring_1999" role="doc-biblioref">1999: 108</a></span> believes the first possibility to be more plausible.<a href="#fnref35" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn36"><p><span class="citation" data-cites="goehring_1999">Goehring <a href="references.html#ref-goehring_1999" role="doc-biblioref">1999: 95</a></span>, on the bearing of efficient communication means among the communities of the Pachomian <em>koinonia</em>.<a href="#fnref36" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn37"><p>See <a href="10_ostraka-and-graffiti.html#sec-10.3" class="quarto-xref"><span>Section 10.3</span></a> below (cat. no. <a href="./10_ostraka-and-graffiti.html#ost-1">1</a>).<a href="#fnref37" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn38"><p><em>Idem</em> 512.<a href="#fnref38" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn39"><p><span class="citation" data-cites="worp_2004">Worp <a href="references.html#ref-worp_2004" role="doc-biblioref">2004: 111</a></span>.<a href="#fnref39" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn40"><p>See <a href="3_mound-1.html#sec-3.1.3" class="quarto-xref"><span>Section 3.1.3</span></a> above and Sections 10.4-5 (<a href="10_ostraka-and-graffiti.html#sec-10.4" class="quarto-xref"><span>Section 10.4</span></a>, <a href="10_ostraka-and-graffiti.html#sec-10.5" class="quarto-xref"><span>Section 10.5</span></a>) in this volume.<a href="#fnref40" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn41"><p>Winlock <span class="citation" data-cites="winlock_1936"><a href="references.html#ref-winlock_1936" role="doc-biblioref">1936: 17–18, pls. IX–X</a></span>.<a href="#fnref41" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn42"><p>See <a href="10_ostraka-and-graffiti.html#sec-10.5" class="quarto-xref"><span>Section 10.5</span></a> below, in particular pp. 533–37.<a href="#fnref42" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn43"><p>On Egyptian villages of the Byzantine period, see <span class="citation" data-cites="keenan_2007">Keenan <a href="references.html#ref-keenan_2007" role="doc-biblioref">2007</a></span>, which considers a large amount of relevant documentary evidence.<a href="#fnref43" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn44"><p>For information about archaeological work on Graeco-Roman Egypt in recent decades, see <span class="citation" data-cites="bagnall_2001">Bagnall <a href="references.html#ref-bagnall_2001" role="doc-biblioref">2001</a></span> and <span class="citation" data-cites="bagnall_davoli_2011">Bagnall and Davoli <a href="references.html#ref-bagnall_davoli_2011" role="doc-biblioref">2011</a></span>. Cf. also p. 75, footnote 63 in this volume.<a href="#fnref44" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn45"><p>On Egyptian villages and cities, see <span class="citation" data-cites="bagnall_2005">Bagnall <a href="references.html#ref-bagnall_2005" role="doc-biblioref">2005</a></span>.<a href="#fnref45" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn46"><p>See <span class="citation" data-cites="bagnall_1993">Bagnall <a href="references.html#ref-bagnall_1993" role="doc-biblioref">1993: 110–47</a></span>.<a href="#fnref46" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn47"><p><span class="citation" data-cites="bagnall_1993">Bagnall <a href="references.html#ref-bagnall_1993" role="doc-biblioref">1993: 110</a></span>. See also <span class="citation" data-cites="bowman_2013">Bowman <a href="references.html#ref-bowman_2013" role="doc-biblioref">2013</a></span>.<a href="#fnref47" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn48"><p><em>Idem</em>.<a href="#fnref48" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn49"><p><span class="citation" data-cites="bagnall_1985a">Bagnall <a href="references.html#ref-bagnall_1985a" role="doc-biblioref">1985: 291–96</a></span>.<a href="#fnref49" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn50"><p>On agriculture in Egypt since the Pharaonic period, see <span class="citation" data-cites="bowman_rogan_1999">Bowman and Rogan <a href="references.html#ref-bowman_rogan_1999" role="doc-biblioref">1999</a></span>, in particular pp. 139–216 on the Roman and Byzantine periods.<a href="#fnref50" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn51"><p><span class="citation" data-cites="bagnall_1993">Bagnall <a href="references.html#ref-bagnall_1993" role="doc-biblioref">1993: 113</a></span>. Cf. also the evidence from the accounts of the Apiones’ <em>pronoetai</em> (overseers) in <span class="citation" data-cites="mazza_2001">Mazza <a href="references.html#ref-mazza_2001" role="doc-biblioref">2001: 87–88</a></span>.<a href="#fnref51" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn52"><p>For a recent bibliography on pottery production centers in Late Antiquity, see <span class="citation" data-cites="putzeys_2007">Putzeys <a href="references.html#ref-putzeys_2007" role="doc-biblioref">2007: 63–65</a></span>. With regard specifically to Egypt, see <span class="citation" data-cites="marchand_2014">Marchand <a href="references.html#ref-marchand_2014" role="doc-biblioref">2014</a></span>.<a href="#fnref52" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn53"><p><span class="citation" data-cites="bagnall_1993">Bagnall <a href="references.html#ref-bagnall_1993" role="doc-biblioref">1993: 111, 114</a></span> on the irregular spatial articulation of Egyptian villages.<a href="#fnref53" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn54"><p>On women and their role in the economic and social life of Late Antique Egyptian villages, see <span class="citation" data-cites="bagnall_1993">Bagnall <a href="references.html#ref-bagnall_1993" role="doc-biblioref">1993: 130–33</a></span>. See also <span class="citation" data-cites="wilfong_1999">Wilfong <a href="references.html#ref-wilfong_1999" role="doc-biblioref">1999: 117–49</a></span>, and <span class="citation" data-cites="wilfong_2007">Wilfong <a href="references.html#ref-wilfong_2007" role="doc-biblioref">2007: 318</a> ff.</span> On documentary evidence pertaining to women, see <span class="citation" data-cites="bagnall_cribiore_2006">Bagnall and Cribiore <a href="references.html#ref-bagnall_cribiore_2006" role="doc-biblioref">2006</a></span>.<a href="#fnref54" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn55"><p><span class="citation" data-cites="konstantinidis_2015">Konstantinidis <a href="references.html#ref-konstantinidis_2015" role="doc-biblioref">2015</a></span>; <span class="citation" data-cites="hickey_2012">Hickey <a href="references.html#ref-hickey_2012" role="doc-biblioref">2012: 25–26</a></span>; <span class="citation" data-cites="banaji_2007">Banaji <a href="references.html#ref-banaji_2007" role="doc-biblioref">2007: 11–12</a></span>; <span class="citation" data-cites="mazza_2001">Mazza <a href="references.html#ref-mazza_2001" role="doc-biblioref">2001: 79</a></span>; <span class="citation" data-cites="bagnall_1993">Bagnall <a href="references.html#ref-bagnall_1993" role="doc-biblioref">1993: 151</a></span>; <span class="citation" data-cites="lewuillonblume_1979">Lewuillon-Blume <a href="references.html#ref-lewuillonblume_1979" role="doc-biblioref">1979</a></span>. On landholding and its role within the economy of Late Antique Egypt, see <span class="citation" data-cites="bagnall_1992">Bagnall <a href="references.html#ref-bagnall_1992" role="doc-biblioref">1992</a></span>; <span class="citation" data-cites="banaji_1999">Banaji <a href="references.html#ref-banaji_1999" role="doc-biblioref">1999</a></span> and <span class="citation" data-cites="banaji_2007">Banaji <a href="references.html#ref-banaji_2007" role="doc-biblioref">2007</a></span> (especially chapters 5 and 7); <span class="citation" data-cites="hickey_2007">Hickey <a href="references.html#ref-hickey_2007" role="doc-biblioref">2007</a></span>.<a href="#fnref55" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn56"><p><span class="citation" data-cites="rathbone_1991">Rathbone <a href="references.html#ref-rathbone_1991" role="doc-biblioref">1991: 22–43</a></span>. There seem to be, however, significant differences between his reconstruction and the layout of the buildings on mound I at ʿAin el-Gedida. Similarities have been established between ancient <em>epoikia</em> and modern Egyptian <em>ezab</em> (sing. <em>ezbeh</em>): cf. in particular <span class="citation" data-cites="lewuillonblume_1979">Lewuillon-Blume <a href="references.html#ref-lewuillonblume_1979" role="doc-biblioref">1979: 185</a></span> and <span class="citation" data-cites="grenfell_hunt_1907">Grenfell and Hunt <a href="references.html#ref-grenfell_hunt_1907" role="doc-biblioref">1907: 356</a></span>. On the <em>ezbeh</em>, see, among others, <span class="citation" data-cites="lozach_hug_1930">Lozach and Hug <a href="references.html#ref-lozach_hug_1930" role="doc-biblioref">1930: 156–60</a></span>; <span class="citation" data-cites="binder_1978">Binder <a href="references.html#ref-binder_1978" role="doc-biblioref">1978: 106–8, 216–55</a></span>; <span class="citation" data-cites="springborg_1982">Springborg <a href="references.html#ref-springborg_1982" role="doc-biblioref">1982: 90</a></span>; <span class="citation" data-cites="alleaume_1999">Alleaume <a href="references.html#ref-alleaume_1999" role="doc-biblioref">1999: 331–35</a></span>.<a href="#fnref56" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn57"><p><em>Idem</em> 31.<a href="#fnref57" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn58"><p>Installations for the production of pottery, and associated with agricultural centers, were found at other Egyptian sites, such as at Marea (<span class="citation" data-cites="bagnall_rathbone_2004">Bagnall and Rathbone <a href="references.html#ref-bagnall_rathbone_2004" role="doc-biblioref">2004: 76</a></span>). On the Polish excavations at Marea, see <span class="citation" data-cites="szymanska_babraj_2006">Szymańska and Babraj <a href="references.html#ref-szymanska_babraj_2006" role="doc-biblioref">2006</a></span> and <span class="citation" data-cites="szymanska_babraj_2007">Szymańska and Babraj <a href="references.html#ref-szymanska_babraj_2007" role="doc-biblioref">2007</a></span>. On centers of ceramic production in ancient Egypt, see the recent survey by <span class="citation" data-cites="marchand_2014">Marchand <a href="references.html#ref-marchand_2014" role="doc-biblioref">2014</a></span>.<a href="#fnref58" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn59"><p><span class="citation" data-cites="sarris_2004">Sarris <a href="references.html#ref-sarris_2004" role="doc-biblioref">2004: 284</a></span>.<a href="#fnref59" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn60"><p>See <a href="10_ostraka-and-graffiti.html#sec-10.3" class="quarto-xref"><span>Section 10.3</span></a> below (cat. no. <a href="./10_ostraka-and-graffiti.html#ost-9">9</a>).<a href="#fnref60" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn61"><p>On the translation of the term and parallels, cf. in particular p. 526 below.<a href="#fnref61" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn62"><p>See <a href="10_ostraka-and-graffiti.html#sec-10.3" class="quarto-xref"><span>Section 10.3</span></a> below (cat. no. <a href="./10_ostraka-and-graffiti.html#ost-5">5</a>).<a href="#fnref62" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn63"><p>See <a href="10_ostraka-and-graffiti.html#sec-10.3" class="quarto-xref"><span>Section 10.3</span></a> below (cat. no. <a href="./10_ostraka-and-graffiti.html#ost-8">8</a>).<a href="#fnref63" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn64"><p>See <span class="citation" data-cites="kucera_2012">Kucera <a href="references.html#ref-kucera_2012" role="doc-biblioref">2012</a></span>; <span class="citation" data-cites="gardner_2012">Gardner <a href="references.html#ref-gardner_2012" role="doc-biblioref">2012</a></span>; <span class="citation" data-cites="ast_bagnall_2015">Ast and Bagnall <a href="references.html#ref-ast_bagnall_2015" role="doc-biblioref">2015</a></span>.<a href="#fnref64" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn65"><p><span class="citation" data-cites="kucera_2012">Kucera <a href="references.html#ref-kucera_2012" role="doc-biblioref">2012</a></span>.<a href="#fnref65" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn66"><p>See <span class="citation" data-cites="remondon_1955">Rémondon <a href="references.html#ref-remondon_1955" role="doc-biblioref">1955</a></span> and <span class="citation" data-cites="remondon_1965">Rémondon <a href="references.html#ref-remondon_1965" role="doc-biblioref">1965</a></span>; <span class="citation" data-cites="schwartz_etal_1969">Schwartz et al. <a href="references.html#ref-schwartz_etal_1969" role="doc-biblioref">1969: 1–26</a></span>; <span class="citation" data-cites="carrie_1974">Carrié <a href="references.html#ref-carrie_1974" role="doc-biblioref">1974</a></span>; <span class="citation" data-cites="carrie_1977">Carrié <a href="references.html#ref-carrie_1977" role="doc-biblioref">1977</a></span>; <span class="citation" data-cites="carrie_1986">Carrié <a href="references.html#ref-carrie_1986" role="doc-biblioref">1986</a></span>; <span class="citation" data-cites="bagnall_1993">Bagnall <a href="references.html#ref-bagnall_1993" role="doc-biblioref">1993: 174–75</a></span>. <span class="citation" data-cites="palme_2007">Palme <a href="references.html#ref-palme_2007" role="doc-biblioref">2007</a></span> deals with the Roman government and army in Egypt during Late Antiquity. On Egyptian geography based on the <em>Notitia Dignitatum</em>, see <span class="citation" data-cites="worp_1994">Worp <a href="references.html#ref-worp_1994" role="doc-biblioref">1994</a></span>.<a href="#fnref66" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn67"><p>On the presence of the army in Egyptian villages, see <span class="citation" data-cites="aubert_1995">Aubert <a href="references.html#ref-aubert_1995" role="doc-biblioref">1995</a></span>.<a href="#fnref67" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
<li id="fn68"><p>One example is the Early Christian building recently found at Megiddo, in present-day Israel. There is solid evidence attesting that the <em>domus ecclesiae</em> was used by members of the Roman army since the second half of the third century CE: cf. <span class="citation" data-cites="tepper_2006">Tepper <a href="references.html#ref-tepper_2006" role="doc-biblioref">2006</a></span>; <span class="citation" data-cites="tepper_di_segni_2006">Tepper and Di Segni <a href="references.html#ref-tepper_di_segni_2006" role="doc-biblioref">2006</a></span>; <span class="citation" data-cites="adams_2008">Adams <a href="references.html#ref-adams_2008" role="doc-biblioref">2008</a></span>.<a href="#fnref68" class="footnote-back" role="doc-backlink">↩︎</a></p></li>
</ol>
</section>
</main> <!-- /main -->
<script id="quarto-html-after-body" type="application/javascript">
window.document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", function (event) {
const icon = "";
const anchorJS = new window.AnchorJS();
anchorJS.options = {
placement: 'right',
icon: icon
};
anchorJS.add('.anchored');
const isCodeAnnotation = (el) => {
for (const clz of el.classList) {
if (clz.startsWith('code-annotation-')) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
const onCopySuccess = function(e) {
// button target
const button = e.trigger;
// don't keep focus
button.blur();
// flash "checked"
button.classList.add('code-copy-button-checked');
var currentTitle = button.getAttribute("title");
button.setAttribute("title", "Copied!");
let tooltip;
if (window.bootstrap) {
button.setAttribute("data-bs-toggle", "tooltip");
button.setAttribute("data-bs-placement", "left");
button.setAttribute("data-bs-title", "Copied!");
tooltip = new bootstrap.Tooltip(button,
{ trigger: "manual",
customClass: "code-copy-button-tooltip",
offset: [0, -8]});
tooltip.show();
}
setTimeout(function() {
if (tooltip) {
tooltip.hide();
button.removeAttribute("data-bs-title");
button.removeAttribute("data-bs-toggle");
button.removeAttribute("data-bs-placement");
}
button.setAttribute("title", currentTitle);
button.classList.remove('code-copy-button-checked');
}, 1000);
// clear code selection
e.clearSelection();
}
const getTextToCopy = function(trigger) {
const outerScaffold = trigger.parentElement.cloneNode(true);
const codeEl = outerScaffold.querySelector('code');
for (const childEl of codeEl.children) {
if (isCodeAnnotation(childEl)) {
childEl.remove();
}
}
return codeEl.innerText;
}
const clipboard = new window.ClipboardJS('.code-copy-button:not([data-in-quarto-modal])', {
text: getTextToCopy
});
clipboard.on('success', onCopySuccess);
if (window.document.getElementById('quarto-embedded-source-code-modal')) {
const clipboardModal = new window.ClipboardJS('.code-copy-button[data-in-quarto-modal]', {
text: getTextToCopy,
container: window.document.getElementById('quarto-embedded-source-code-modal')
});
clipboardModal.on('success', onCopySuccess);
}
var localhostRegex = new RegExp(/^(?:http|https):\/\/localhost\:?[0-9]*\//);
var mailtoRegex = new RegExp(/^mailto:/);
var filterRegex = new RegExp('/' + window.location.host + '/');
var isInternal = (href) => {
return filterRegex.test(href) || localhostRegex.test(href) || mailtoRegex.test(href);
}
// Inspect non-navigation links and adorn them if external
var links = window.document.querySelectorAll('a[href]:not(.nav-link):not(.navbar-brand):not(.toc-action):not(.sidebar-link):not(.sidebar-item-toggle):not(.pagination-link):not(.no-external):not([aria-hidden]):not(.dropdown-item):not(.quarto-navigation-tool):not(.about-link)');
for (var i=0; i<links.length; i++) {
const link = links[i];
if (!isInternal(link.href)) {
// undo the damage that might have been done by quarto-nav.js in the case of
// links that we want to consider external
if (link.dataset.originalHref !== undefined) {
link.href = link.dataset.originalHref;
}
}
}
function tippyHover(el, contentFn, onTriggerFn, onUntriggerFn) {
const config = {
allowHTML: true,
maxWidth: 500,
delay: 100,
arrow: false,
appendTo: function(el) {
return el.parentElement;
},
interactive: true,
interactiveBorder: 10,
theme: 'quarto',
placement: 'bottom-start',
};
if (contentFn) {
config.content = contentFn;
}
if (onTriggerFn) {
config.onTrigger = onTriggerFn;
}
if (onUntriggerFn) {
config.onUntrigger = onUntriggerFn;
}
window.tippy(el, config);
}
const noterefs = window.document.querySelectorAll('a[role="doc-noteref"]');
for (var i=0; i<noterefs.length; i++) {
const ref = noterefs[i];
tippyHover(ref, function() {
// use id or data attribute instead here
let href = ref.getAttribute('data-footnote-href') || ref.getAttribute('href');
try { href = new URL(href).hash; } catch {}
const id = href.replace(/^#\/?/, "");
const note = window.document.getElementById(id);
if (note) {
return note.innerHTML;
} else {
return "";
}
});
}
const xrefs = window.document.querySelectorAll('a.quarto-xref');
const processXRef = (id, note) => {
// Strip column container classes
const stripColumnClz = (el) => {
el.classList.remove("page-full", "page-columns");
if (el.children) {
for (const child of el.children) {
stripColumnClz(child);
}
}
}
stripColumnClz(note)
if (id === null || id.startsWith('sec-')) {
// Special case sections, only their first couple elements
const container = document.createElement("div");
if (note.children && note.children.length > 2) {
container.appendChild(note.children[0].cloneNode(true));
for (let i = 1; i < note.children.length; i++) {
const child = note.children[i];
if (child.tagName === "P" && child.innerText === "") {
continue;
} else {
container.appendChild(child.cloneNode(true));
break;
}
}
if (window.Quarto?.typesetMath) {
window.Quarto.typesetMath(container);
}
return container.innerHTML
} else {
if (window.Quarto?.typesetMath) {
window.Quarto.typesetMath(note);
}
return note.innerHTML;
}
} else {
// Remove any anchor links if they are present
const anchorLink = note.querySelector('a.anchorjs-link');
if (anchorLink) {
anchorLink.remove();
}
if (window.Quarto?.typesetMath) {
window.Quarto.typesetMath(note);
}
if (note.classList.contains("callout")) {
return note.outerHTML;
} else {
return note.innerHTML;
}
}
}
for (var i=0; i<xrefs.length; i++) {
const xref = xrefs[i];
tippyHover(xref, undefined, function(instance) {
instance.disable();
let url = xref.getAttribute('href');
let hash = undefined;
if (url.startsWith('#')) {
hash = url;
} else {
try { hash = new URL(url).hash; } catch {}
}
if (hash) {
const id = hash.replace(/^#\/?/, "");
const note = window.document.getElementById(id);
if (note !== null) {
try {
const html = processXRef(id, note.cloneNode(true));
instance.setContent(html);
} finally {
instance.enable();
instance.show();
}
} else {
// See if we can fetch this
fetch(url.split('#')[0])
.then(res => res.text())
.then(html => {
const parser = new DOMParser();
const htmlDoc = parser.parseFromString(html, "text/html");
const note = htmlDoc.getElementById(id);
if (note !== null) {
const html = processXRef(id, note);
instance.setContent(html);
}
}).finally(() => {
instance.enable();
instance.show();
});
}
} else {
// See if we can fetch a full url (with no hash to target)
// This is a special case and we should probably do some content thinning / targeting
fetch(url)
.then(res => res.text())
.then(html => {
const parser = new DOMParser();
const htmlDoc = parser.parseFromString(html, "text/html");
const note = htmlDoc.querySelector('main.content');
if (note !== null) {
// This should only happen for chapter cross references
// (since there is no id in the URL)
// remove the first header
if (note.children.length > 0 && note.children[0].tagName === "HEADER") {
note.children[0].remove();
}
const html = processXRef(null, note);
instance.setContent(html);
}
}).finally(() => {
instance.enable();
instance.show();
});
}
}, function(instance) {
});
}
let selectedAnnoteEl;
const selectorForAnnotation = ( cell, annotation) => {
let cellAttr = 'data-code-cell="' + cell + '"';
let lineAttr = 'data-code-annotation="' + annotation + '"';
const selector = 'span[' + cellAttr + '][' + lineAttr + ']';
return selector;
}
const selectCodeLines = (annoteEl) => {
const doc = window.document;
const targetCell = annoteEl.getAttribute("data-target-cell");
const targetAnnotation = annoteEl.getAttribute("data-target-annotation");
const annoteSpan = window.document.querySelector(selectorForAnnotation(targetCell, targetAnnotation));
const lines = annoteSpan.getAttribute("data-code-lines").split(",");
const lineIds = lines.map((line) => {
return targetCell + "-" + line;
})
let top = null;
let height = null;
let parent = null;
if (lineIds.length > 0) {
//compute the position of the single el (top and bottom and make a div)
const el = window.document.getElementById(lineIds[0]);
top = el.offsetTop;
height = el.offsetHeight;
parent = el.parentElement.parentElement;
if (lineIds.length > 1) {
const lastEl = window.document.getElementById(lineIds[lineIds.length - 1]);
const bottom = lastEl.offsetTop + lastEl.offsetHeight;
height = bottom - top;
}
if (top !== null && height !== null && parent !== null) {
// cook up a div (if necessary) and position it
let div = window.document.getElementById("code-annotation-line-highlight");
if (div === null) {
div = window.document.createElement("div");
div.setAttribute("id", "code-annotation-line-highlight");