We should move over to nusb v0.2 at some point.
kevinmehall/nusb#159 has some guidance on what has changed. I'd be open to a change that either adds nusb-v0_2 as a feature (along side v0_1), or a breaking switch over.
We may want to make the feature for this tokio-nusb-v0_2, similar to tokio-std, if we are activating the tokio feature for async usage. Another option would be to use a blocking worker thread, though I'm not sure what the tradeoffs there are.
We should move over to
nusbv0.2 at some point.kevinmehall/nusb#159 has some guidance on what has changed. I'd be open to a change that either adds
nusb-v0_2as a feature (along sidev0_1), or a breaking switch over.We may want to make the feature for this
tokio-nusb-v0_2, similar totokio-std, if we are activating thetokiofeature for async usage. Another option would be to use a blocking worker thread, though I'm not sure what the tradeoffs there are.