Skip to content

Commit 9ed5ac7

Browse files
inashivbvictorjulien
authored andcommitted
doc: make firewall table names consistent
1 parent 7fec188 commit 9ed5ac7

1 file changed

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions

File tree

doc/userguide/firewall/firewall-design.rst

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ next table is ``app:*:*``.
221221
In ``app:*:*`` the per application layer states are all evaluated at least once. At each of
222222
these states an ``accept:hook`` is required to progress to the next state. When all available states
223223
have been accepted, the pipeline moves to the final table ``app:td`` (application layer threat
224-
detection). A ``drop`` in the ``app_filter`` table is immediate, however and ``accept`` is
224+
detection). A ``drop`` in the ``app:filter`` table is immediate, however and ``accept`` is
225225
conditional on the verdict of the ``app:td`` table.
226226

227227
The default ``drop`` in one of the ``app:*:*`` tables is a ``drop:flow``. This means that the
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ Pass rules with Firewall mode
243243
In IDS/IPS mode, a ``pass`` rule with app-layer matches will bypass the detection engine for the
244244
rest of the flow. In firewall mode, this bypass no longer happens in the same way, as ``pass`` rules
245245
do not affect firewall rules. So the detection engine is still invoked on packets of such a flow,
246-
but the ``packet_td`` and ``app_td`` tables are skipped.
246+
but the ``packet:td`` and ``app:td`` tables are skipped.
247247

248248
Firewall rules
249249
==============

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)