| name | analyze-competitors |
|---|---|
| description | Build a competitive positioning matrix and strategy canvas when the user asks to analyze competitors, compare products, or assess competitive landscape |
| owner | chalk |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| metadata-version | 1 |
| allowed-tools | Read, Glob, Grep, Write |
| argument-hint | [competitor names and/or dimensions to compare] |
Generate a competitive positioning matrix and Blue Ocean Strategy canvas that compares your product against named competitors across key dimensions: features, pricing, target market, UX, strengths, and weaknesses. Surfaces differentiation opportunities and strategic white space.
-
Read product context -- Scan
.chalk/docs/product/for the product profile (0_product_profile.md), JTBD docs, and any existing competitive analyses. If no product context exists, ask the user to describe their product before proceeding. -
Parse competitors and dimensions -- Extract from
$ARGUMENTSthe competitor names and any specific dimensions the user wants compared. If no competitors are named, ask the user to list 2-5 direct competitors. If no dimensions are specified, use the defaults: core features, pricing model, target market, UX quality, integration ecosystem, go-to-market approach. -
Determine the next file number -- Read filenames in
.chalk/docs/product/to find the highest numbered file. The next number ishighest + 1. -
Build the competitive matrix -- For each competitor, analyze across every dimension. Use a consistent rating or description per cell. Be specific -- "freemium with $29/mo pro tier" not "has free plan."
-
Create the strategy canvas -- Describe a Blue Ocean Strategy canvas: list the competing factors on the X-axis and value level (low to high) on the Y-axis. Plot your product and each competitor. Identify factors where you can eliminate, reduce, raise, or create to find uncontested market space.
-
Identify positioning insights -- Summarize: where you are differentiated, where you are at parity, where competitors have an advantage, and where white space exists.
-
Write the file -- Save to
.chalk/docs/product/<n>_competitive_analysis.md. -
Confirm -- Share the file path and highlight the top 2-3 differentiation opportunities or competitive risks.
- File:
.chalk/docs/product/<n>_competitive_analysis.md - Format: Plain markdown with comparison table, strategy canvas description, and positioning insights
- First line:
# Competitive Analysis: <Your Product> vs. <Competitors>
- Feature checklist without context -- A grid of checkmarks tells you nothing about competitive dynamics. Every cell should describe the quality and approach, not just presence/absence.
- Ignoring indirect competitors -- Products in adjacent categories that solve the same job often matter more than direct feature competitors.
- Stale data presented as current -- If you do not have current information about a competitor, say so. Do not fabricate pricing or feature details.
- Missing "so what" -- A comparison table without positioning insights is just data. Always conclude with what the analysis means for product strategy.
- Only comparing features -- Pricing, distribution, brand, and go-to-market are often more decisive than feature parity. Compare across all strategic dimensions.