Broader syntax definition support #278
jmacdonald
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Amp currently relies on syntax definitions included in
syntect, which is convenient but not comprehensive (e.g.Nixisn't included in that list). It would be great to build a system to vendor these and others so we can start to grow the list of languages/formats supported out of the box. For languages/formats that don't have preexisting syntax definitions available, this would be an area where users can contribute to Amp by creating ones for file types they use.The system used by
batmay be useful as inspiration.All reactions