You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: readme.md
+1Lines changed: 1 addition & 0 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ Code review is the systematic examination (sometimes referred to as peer review)
46
46
-[How I review code](https://engineering.tumblr.com/post/170040992289/how-i-review-code) More personal advice on how to best review a pull request from an engineer at Tumblr.
47
47
-[How to do a code review](https://google.github.io/eng-practices/review/reviewer/) A thorough description of how Google engineers do code reviews, from the Google's Engineering Practices documentation.
48
48
-[How to Do Code Reviews Like a Human](https://mtlynch.io/human-code-reviews-1/) Techniques that treat the code review as not only a technical process but a social one as well.
49
+
-[Modern Code Reviews](https://rethought.se/research/modern-code-reviews/) Arguably belongs in academic paper, but it's a website giving an overview of evidence on code review by facet/context. Links off to a bunch of papers.
49
50
-[On Code Review](https://medium.com/@schrockn/on-code-reviews-b1c7c94d868c) Short article about tooling and personal elements of code review, from an ex-Facebook engineer.
50
51
-[Pull Requests: How to Get and Give Good Feedback](https://kickstarter.engineering/pull-requests-how-to-get-and-give-good-feedback-f573469f0c44) Advice for both sides of the code review process, the reviewer and the reviewee.
51
52
-[Ship Small Diffs](https://blog.skyliner.io/ship-small-diffs-741308bec0d1) Why it's better to review small changes rather than large ones.
0 commit comments