Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
164 lines (134 loc) · 10.4 KB

File metadata and controls

164 lines (134 loc) · 10.4 KB

Human Activity Recognition

Terms used

Human Activity Recognition (HAR) is also known as / has sub-tasks such as

  • Activity Recognition / human activity recognition (AR)
  • Activities of Daily Living (ADL).
  • Action recognition
  • Fall detection. (FD)
  • Fitness tracking / Exercise recognition
  • Sleep monitoring / sleep quality tracking
  • Posture monitoring
  • Gait analysis
  • Eating monitoring
  • Seizure detection

Review papers

Giving some overview of the area.

A systematic review of smartphone-based human activity recognition methods for health research

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-021-00514-4

Marcin Straczkiewicz, Peter James & Jukka-Pekka Onnela. 2021

Describes the various approaches used for data acquisition, data preprocessing, feature extraction, and activity classification, identifying the most common practices, and their alternatives.

Very nice illustrations.

Datasets

Existing work

Activity intensity

Comparability of accelerometry outcomes across popular metrics and widespread sensor positions

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0337897 2025.

The raw data was converted into four common metrics: Movement Acceleration Intensity (MAI), Euclidean Norm Minus One (ENMO), Mean Amplitude Deviation (MAD) and counts per minute (CPM). Correlations between MAI, MAD and ENMO were high (r = .9), while correlations between CPM and other metrics were substantially lower (r = .78), less linear, and influenced by activity type.

Detailed analysis and comparison of different activity metrics

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0261718 2021.

Actigraphic measurements are an important part of research in different disciplines, yet the procedure of determining activity values is unexpectedly not standardized in the literature. We assessed the different methods by analysing the triaxial acceleration signals measured during a 10-day movement of 42 subjects. We calculated 148 different activity signals for each subject’s movement using the combinations of various types of preprocessing and 7 different activity metrics applied on both axial and magnitude data.

Validation of Cut-Points for Evaluating the Intensity of Physical Activity with Accelerometry-Based Mean Amplitude Deviation (MAD)

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0134813 2015

Derive a regression model that estimates oxygen consumption (VO2) from MAD values and validate the MAD-based cut-points for light, moderate and vigorous locomotion against VO2 within a wide range of speeds. The MAD and VO2 showed a very strong association. Within individuals, the range of r values was from 0.927 to 0.991 providing the mean r = 0.969. The optimal MAD cut-point for 3.0 MET was 91 mg (milligravity) and 414 mg for 6.0 MET.

Walking recognition

A “one-size-fits-most” walking recognition method for smartphones, smartwatches, and wearable accelerometers

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-022-00745-z

Cadence (steps/min) as an indicator of the walk-to-run transition

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37336086/

Humans naturally transition from walking to running at a point known as the walk-to-run transition (WRT). The WRT commonly occurs at a speed of ∼2.1 m/s (m/s) or a Froude number (dimensionless value considering leg length) of 0.5. Emerging evidence suggests the WRT can also be classified using a cadence of 140 steps/min.