Creating Python SDK for rrelayer #48
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@Parizval is attempting to deploy a commit to the joshaavecom's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
…um Address to RelayerClient
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Working on Issue: #2
Project has been setup using "uv" package manager and "ruff" is being used as linter for the SDK development. (https://astral.sh/)
Since, All the interactions with the SDK would be done on the server side. Using AsyncIO would be best approach as per my understanding for functions.
Python is a dynamically typed language (similar to Javascript in some ways). Pydantic Framework would be validating that correct type of arguments for object creation and function calling are passed.