Clarify if "should-total" duration allowed to be negative #388
Replies: 3 comments
-
|
Yeah, good question. It’s allowed intentionally, because there is no technical reason to reject it. I thought maybe someone has a use-case like “my manager told me to take half a day off because I did such a great job yesterday” and wants to note that down as a separate record rather than deducting it somewhere. It’s a bit artificial and maybe not ever needed, but on the other hand it shouldn’t do any harm to allow it. (People don’t have to use it, after all.) I agree, though, that it’s somewhat unintuitive and that the spec could make this clearer! Probably best to add an extra sentence à la |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I think that would be a great addition to the spec 👍 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Done 8927d2e |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
It feels unnatural to specify a negative duration, however the spec allows it.
I believe it would be good to clarify this by either
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions