[📝 Docs]: Improved `/docs/index.page.tsx` structure and SEO

[adityajha2005]

What Docs changes are you proposing?

I’m suggesting some improvements to the /docs/index.page.tsx page, including:

Cleaning up the code for better readability and maintainability.
Adding semantic HTML to improve accessibility and structure.
Enhancing SEO with meta descriptions to make the docs more discoverable.
Making the page more responsive by improving the use of Tailwind classes.
Organizing the card data into a constant (CARDS_DATA) to make future updates easier

Right now, the page could be more user-friendly and maintainable. The current structure makes it harder to update or extend. Also, accessibility and SEO improvements can help ensure the docs reach and serve a wider audience effectively.

It will benefit by providing a better user experience, easier navigation, and more maintainable docs for contributors.

Code of Conduct

• I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct

[github-actions]

Welcome to the JSON Schema Community. We are so excited you are here! Thanks a lot for reporting your first issue!! 🎉🎉 Please make sure to take a look at our contributors guide if you plan on opening a pull request.
For more details, check out the README.md file.

[DhairyaMajmudar]

Hi @adityajha2005 can you pls. show some stats/data of improved SEO after performing these changes

[dev-mohit06]

Proposal: Improve Documentation Page Structure and SEO

Overview

I would like to contribute to improving the /docs/index.page.tsx page by implementing several key enhancements that will boost usability, maintainability, and accessibility.

Proposed Changes

Code Structure and Maintainability

• Refactor the existing code to improve readability and organization
• Create a dedicated CARDS_DATA constant to centralize and manage documentation card information
• Implement consistent code formatting and documentation
• Break down complex components into smaller, reusable pieces

Accessibility Improvements

• Add semantic HTML elements for better structure (<main>, <section>, <article>)
• Include proper ARIA labels and roles where necessary
• Ensure proper heading hierarchy throughout the page
• Improve keyboard navigation support

SEO Enhancements

• Add comprehensive meta descriptions
• Implement structured data for better search engine understanding
• Optimize heading tags for search engines
• Include relevant OpenGraph tags for better social sharing

Responsive Design

• Enhance Tailwind utility class usage for better responsive behavior
• Implement improved mobile navigation
• Optimize layout for different screen sizes
• Ensure consistent spacing across viewports

Implementation Approach

1. First pass: Code restructuring and CARDS_DATA implementation
2. Second pass: Semantic HTML and accessibility improvements
3. Third pass: SEO meta tags and structured data
4. Final pass: Responsive design optimizations

Expected Benefits

• Improved user experience through better organization and navigation
• Enhanced accessibility for users with disabilities
• Better search engine visibility and discoverability
• Easier maintenance and updates for contributors
• More consistent responsive behavior across devices

I'm excited to contribute to improving the documentation experience and would appreciate the opportunity to work on this issue.

References

• Issue [📝 Docs]: Improved /docs/index.page.tsx structure and SEO #1242
• Current /docs/index.page.tsx implementation
• Project's accessibility guidelines
• SEO best practices documentation

@michaelmior, @DhairyaMajmudar, @adityajha2005, @kurtmckee, @theory

I would greatly appreciate if you could assign this issue to me. I'm ready to begin working on these improvements and will follow the implementation plan outlined above.

Please let me know if you would like me to proceed with this implementation or if you need any clarification on the proposed changes.

[michaelmior]

@dev-mohit06 I'm not affiliated with this project, so I don't have the ability to assign anything.

[kurtmckee]

@dev-mohit06 I contributed exactly once, almost a year ago. How did you determine that you should ping me here? I'm frequently @-mentioned in this repo and I'd like to understand why this keeps happening.