Allow @ResourceLock and @Isolated to work across processes

[Arthurm1]

@ResourceLock is great for ensuring tests run with as much concurrency as possible while protecting exclusive access to resources for the duration of a single test method/class.

My issue is that it only protects the resource within that single JUnit test run. If I execute a number of different test runs simultaneously (in different processes) and those test runs have tests that use @ResourceLock("foo") then foo can be accessed at the same time from the different test runs.

This happens for me as I use Gradle and have many subprojects. Gradle allows running subprojects tests in parallel or sequentially. Running tests in parallel means each project will run its tests in its own process and so @ResourceLock("foo") will not be respected across subprojects.

Because of this I have to run each subproject's test task sequentially which is slower.

Deliverables

Ideally there would be an option on @ResourceLock to specify the level of the lock e.g. @ResourceLock(level = LOCAL | MACHINE).

For @ResourceLock("Foo", level = LOCAL), the locking would behave as it currently is and this would be the default.
For @ResourceLock("Foo", level = MACHINE) the lock on Foo would prevent any junit runs on that machine from simultaneously accessing Foo. (Perhaps using java.nio.channels.FileLock)

It would be good if this could be extended to @Isolated(level = LOCAL | MACHINE) to allow only a single test to run concurrently even during multiple simultaneous test runs.

Or is there already a way to do this?

[marcphilipp]

You are right in pointing out that there is currently no way to achieve that and it would certainly be non-trivial to implement. Can you elaborate more on your use case? What kind of external resource do you require exclusive access to across subprojects?

[Arthurm1]

In my case it's access to certain tables in a test database and a custom data server. I could always spin up another test DB and another data server but they can be a pain to manage.

I had a different idea on implementation.
Instead of changing the API, there could be a new configuration parameter...
junit.jupiter.execution.lock.location=/tmp/20241220-1150/

If specified, then Junit would use java.nio.channels.FileLock to take a lock on a Foo.junit file within this dir (if @ResourceLock("Foo") had been specified).
This would allow the user to decide which test runs should share locking as a different dir could be used per test run group. It would also mean JUnit wouldn't have to worry about clearing up locks left around if test runs have been interrupted as the dir location would be different next time tests are run.
Resource locking would probably be much slower if files are used but that's the trade off for added functionality. If the config param wasn't used then the current locking implementation would be used.
If the user specified file locking then it would also have the downside of forcing every use of @ResourceLock to use file locking which may not be needed. An API change like above could be made to mitigate this but whether that's necessary depends on the performance hit of using file locks.

[marcphilipp]

I think using a separate file lock for each resource can lead to deadlock. For example, when two processes A and B hold the global read lock (which is done on the engine level), A has a read lock for Foo, B request a write lock for Foo while A requests the global write lock.

[mpkorstanje]

In my case it's access to certain tables in a test database and a custom data server. I could always spin up another test DB and another data server but they can be a pain to manage.

This happens for me as I use Gradle and have many subprojects.

With both a external resource that can't be shared, and a project with independent modules that can't communicate you have an architecture with conflicting modes of concurrency.

This makes me think you need to wag the dog a bit and change your architecture. Either by:

• moving all the tests that use the external resource into their own module,
• or by duplicating the external resource for each module.

For the latter, without knowing any more specifics, this sounds like a problem TestContainers could solve.

[Arthurm1]

Do you mean something like...

@ResourceLock("Foo", mode = ResourceAccessMode.READ)
class TestClass {

  @ResourceLock("Foo", mode = ResourceAccessMode.READ_WRITE)
  public void TestMethod() {
    // some test
  }
}

If both process A and B are running this same test then they could both start the class test suite TestClass with read locks on Foo (which is fine) and then both would try and get a write lock for method TestMethod and they'd both wait forever because they can't get a write lock until the read locks have been released.

How does that not deadlock at the moment with JUnit tests running in parallel in a single process? Or does JUnit work out their lock requirements in a pre-run phase and make sure that they're not run in parallel?

I guess if file locking were used in the above scenario, the pre-run phase could identify any mid-test switches from Read to Read/Write and change them to run only as Read/Write. It would cut down on concurrency but it would prevent deadlocks.

If @Isolated were included in this functionality then all @Isolated tests could take a write lock on isolated.junit and all @ResourceLock tests could take a read lock on that same file. So @ResourceLock would be locking 2 files.

[Arthurm1]

• or by duplicating the external resource for each module.

Setting up multiple duplicate test databases is another option and probably what I'll have to do if this comes to nothing.

Ideally JUnit would handle this - I don't think inter-process resource locking is out of scope for unit testing (especially when that resource is a database) but I haven't seen any requests for it in the issues before so maybe it is a niche requirement.

[mpkorstanje]

How does that not deadlock at the moment with JUnit tests running in parallel in a single process? Or does JUnit work out their lock requirements in a pre-run phase and make sure that they're not run in parallel?

That is correct. For your example the READ_WRITE will cause all tests in TestClass to be run on the same thread.

Ideally JUnit would handle this - I don't think inter-process resource locking is out of scope for unit testing

I don't think it is possible for n arbitrary Java processes to coordinate usage of an arbitrary number of resources without either a n+1 process to arbitrate or by electing a leader from the n processes.

The first isn't possible, the second rather complicated. Probably out of scope for a test framework.