Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
|
I like the idea. Very well thought out. Thanks again for this great suggestions 🚀 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I'm not sure I understand correctly but isn't that just this model? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
This could be a community customizable module, and I thought about it after seeing @furll's flat side brace.
Using a full horizontal support on the backside of a shelf just to keep items in takes a lot of filament and blocks one depth unit inside the storage, on top of needing a pull-through connector (1d1wp) on each side (on the vertical supports).
By having the "fall protector" on the outside as a flat band, attached to the vertical supports with a pin on each side, a shelf could be printed with one less depth (Y) unit and it would make planning easier by not having to take into account the "support unit".
Not counting the gain of saving one depth unit:
x17 seems printable directly on 256x256 beds, at least the slicer doesn't complain, but it could also be printed diagonally even at x20.
Heavy-duty bands with 3 units of height and 2 pin holes on each side could be useful too on bigger (Z-Axis) floors, I'm getting ~26,2g for the x17 band, which is a bit over half of the core support;
In both cases more savings could be done by replacing the solid center of the band with a lattice/truss.
With flat side braces already in place, just adding two bands (one on the back and another on the front) could also make a floor ready for moving very quickly assuming it's full enough.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions