fix(doc): Fixed the link to the palaeographic env in the technical overview, added link to its docs, and distinguished the types of users..

Author: geoffroy-noel-ddh

frontend/src/pages/technical-overview.md

@@ -55,9 +55,11 @@ Linguistic annotation has been undertaken on a Greek and Latin subset of the cor
 
 #### Palaeographic Annotation
 
-Palaeographic annotation is conducted through a dedicated digital palaeographic environment with its own web application and interface ([Annotator](https://kingsdigitallab.github.io/crossreads/annotator.html)) also served and documented via a dedicated [Github repository](https://github.com/kingsdigitallab/crossreads-petrography). The environment lets the user define the palaeographic structure of allographs and then create thousands of Web Annotations ([Web Annotation Data Model](https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-model/)) that bind graphs as they appear on inscription images (using IIIF Image API region format) with their occurrences in the EpiDoc edition (fetched from a [Distributed Text Services (DTS)](https://distributed-text-services.github.io/specifications/) collection) and the formal description of their structure.
-A faceted search interface allows the researcher to filter graph annotations by their structural patterns and define a high-level typology of allographs.
-The list of letter types identified for each annotated inscription are then added to the TEI file and so visible on the corpus website with links back to the palaeography environment. These types are also searchable from the ‘Lettering’ filter in the list of facet options, thus integrating them with the rest of the exploration possibilities within the entire corpus, even though only a selection of inscriptions underwent palaeographic analysis.
+Palaeographic annotation is conducted through a dedicated digital palaeographic environment with its own web application and interface ([Annotator](https://kingsdigitallab.github.io/crossreads/annotator.html)) also served and documented via a dedicated [Github repository](https://github.com/kingsdigitallab/crossreads). The environment offers a set of  connected interfaces with dual use depending on the type of users. They act as an integrated environment for the researcher to curate and verify their definitions and annotations persisted over github json files. The same interfaces also works as a public and read-only view over that research dataset for any visitor. The environment lets the researcher define the palaeographic structure of allographs and then create thousands of Web Annotations ([Web Annotation Data Model](https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-model/)) that bind graphs as they appear on inscription images (using IIIF Image API region format) with their occurrences in the EpiDoc edition (fetched from a [Distributed Text Services (DTS)](https://distributed-text-services.github.io/specifications/) collection) and the formal description of their structure.
+A faceted search interface allows any user to filter graph annotations by their structural patterns and the researcher to define a high-level typology of allographs.
+The list of letter types identified for each annotated inscription can be exported for inclusion into the ISicily TEI corpus file and so visible on the corpus website with links back to the palaeography environment. These types are also searchable from the ‘Lettering’ filter in the list of facet options on the Corpus website, thus integrating them with the rest of the exploration possibilities within the entire corpus, even though only a selection of inscriptions underwent palaeographic analysis.
+
+For additional technical details, please the [documentation in the github repository](https://github.com/kingsdigitallab/crossreads/blob/main/docs/README.md).
 
 #### Petrographic Annotation