Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 27, 2025. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 27, 2025. It is now read-only.

Lavalink reallocation is expensive #42

@kitsuvm

Description

@kitsuvm

Now, when a Lavalink node disconnects, the players associated with it is reallocated to another Lavalink node available on the cluster, but this can lead to a state loss and current behavior doesn't consider a scenario without nodes available.

Dropping the player if the associated Lavalink node disconnect not only solve this issue, but #32 and #34.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions