docs: refresh adoption trial intake

Author: kmishra1204

README.md

@@ -133,7 +133,9 @@ The first public entry point for external trials is:
 
 - [External adoption trial: first opt-in repository review](https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/issues/5)
 
-Use the [adoption trial protocol](docs/ADOPTION_TRIAL_PROTOCOL.md) for read-only reviews, branch trials, and maintainer feedback before any repository is listed in the adoption registry.
+Use the [adoption trial protocol](docs/ADOPTION_TRIAL_PROTOCOL.md), [reviewer quickstart](docs/REVIEWER_QUICKSTART_16_TESTBED.md), and [public review packet](docs/PUBLIC_REVIEW_PACKET.md) for read-only reviews, branch trials, and maintainer feedback before any repository is listed in the adoption registry.
+
+The useful first signal is intentionally small: compare one repository boundary against one readiness example, then comment with one useful part, one heavy part, and one adoption blocker.
 
 ## Good First Review
 
@@ -170,8 +172,8 @@ Bad use:
 
 ## Current Status
 
-Version: `0.5.41`
+Version: `0.5.42`
 
-Status: early OSS profile with a 16-repository public testbed, pinned good-first-review issue, refreshed public discussion, reviewer quickstart, review signal matrix, route-signal response protocol, route-signal ledger, reviewer acknowledgement policy, refreshed route-signal intake template and labels, adopter guide, boundary template, scoring guide, ecosystem alignment brief, compatibility policy, adoption registry, external review guide, external reviewer program, public review packet, maintainer review kit, AAIF proposal readiness self-audit, AAIF project proposal preflight dossier, AAIF engagement dossier, external review and adoption operating queue, ecosystem contribution ledger, contribution monitoring protocol, AAIF Observability trace-model planning evidence, Accuracy & Reliability, Agentic Commerce, Governance/Risk, Identity & Trust, Observability & Traceability, Security & Privacy, and Workflows taxonomy candidate-term evidence, security posture plan, static docs portal, and community engagement plan.
+Status: early OSS profile with a 16-repository public testbed, refreshed adoption-trial intake, pinned good-first-review issue, refreshed public discussion, reviewer quickstart, review signal matrix, route-signal response protocol, route-signal ledger, reviewer acknowledgement policy, refreshed route-signal intake template and labels, adopter guide, boundary template, scoring guide, ecosystem alignment brief, compatibility policy, adoption registry, external review guide, external reviewer program, public review packet, maintainer review kit, AAIF proposal readiness self-audit, AAIF project proposal preflight dossier, AAIF engagement dossier, external review and adoption operating queue, ecosystem contribution ledger, contribution monitoring protocol, AAIF Observability trace-model planning evidence, Accuracy & Reliability, Agentic Commerce, Governance/Risk, Identity & Trust, Observability & Traceability, Security & Privacy, and Workflows taxonomy candidate-term evidence, security posture plan, static docs portal, and community engagement plan.
 
 Next target: external technical feedback from agentic AI maintainers and AAIF/LF-style community forums.

ROADMAP.md

@@ -222,6 +222,11 @@
 - Refresh the public routing discussion so it points to the current release, pinned review issue, route-signal template, A2A/interoperability routing, and anti-endorsement boundary.
 - Link the public discussion from README, public review packet, and docs portal as the broader technical-feedback path beside the one-signal issue.
 
+## 0.5.42
+
+- Refresh the adoption-trial intake path so issue `#5`, the public review packet, adoption protocol, operating queue, and docs portal point reviewers to the current release.
+- Keep adoption language opt-in only: a trial is not adoption, endorsement, certification, AAIF status, or Linux Foundation status.
+
 ## 0.6.0
 
 - Add first external adoption example if a maintainer opts in.

docs/ADOPTION_TRIAL_PROTOCOL.md

@@ -8,6 +8,14 @@ Use it when a maintainer wants to answer a narrow question:
 
 > Does this profile help us expose the evidence an enterprise reviewer would need before trusting or extending our agentic AI repository?
 
+Current public intake issue:
+
+- https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/issues/5
+
+Current release:
+
+- https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/releases/tag/v0.5.42
+
 ## Trial Modes
 
 | Mode | Timebox | Output |
@@ -18,6 +26,14 @@ Use it when a maintainer wants to answer a narrow question:
 
 A trial is not adoption. Adoption should be listed only after the maintainer explicitly asks to be listed in `docs/ADOPTION_REGISTRY.md`.
 
+## Fastest First Trial
+
+1. Pick one repository or one agentic workflow.
+2. Pick one evidence artifact: `AGENTS.md`, boundary model, readiness JSON, audit/observability, OSS fallback, or validation proof.
+3. Compare it with one example from the 16-repository testbed.
+4. Comment in the intake issue with one useful part, one heavy part, and one adoption blocker.
+5. State explicitly whether the repository can be listed publicly as trial evidence.
+
 ## Minimal Read-Only Trial
 
 Review these files:

docs/EXTERNAL_REVIEW_AND_ADOPTION_OPERATING_QUEUE.md

@@ -43,6 +43,12 @@ This queue exists to keep that work human, reviewable, and non-promotional.
 
 ## Adoption Trial Lanes
 
+Current adoption-trial intake:
+
+- Issue: https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/issues/5
+- Release surface: https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/releases/tag/v0.5.42
+- First action: compare one repository boundary with one readiness example, then report one useful part, one heavy part, and one adoption blocker.
+
 | Trial type | Timebox | What changes | What counts as public evidence |
 | --- | --- | --- | --- |
 | Read-only review | 30-60 minutes | No repository changes | Public comment using one review signal |
@@ -97,6 +103,9 @@ No runtime code change is needed. The smallest trial is to compare one repositor
 The trial protocol is:
 https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/blob/main/docs/ADOPTION_TRIAL_PROTOCOL.md
 
+The public intake issue is:
+https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/issues/5
+
 A trial is not adoption, endorsement, certification, AAIF status, or Linux Foundation status. Listing requires explicit public opt-in.
 ```
 

docs/PUBLIC_REVIEW_PACKET.md

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ This is an independent OSS profile. It is not an Agentic AI Foundation project,
 | --- | --- |
 | Repository | https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile |
 | Docs portal | https://kmishra1204.github.io/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/ |
-| Current release | https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/releases/tag/v0.5.41 |
+| Current release | https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/releases/tag/v0.5.42 |
 | Pinned good-first review issue | https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/issues/7 |
 | Public routing discussion | https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/discussions/3 |
 | Focused review issue | https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/issues/4 |
@@ -46,6 +46,12 @@ The fastest public entry point is the pinned good-first review issue:
 
 - https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/issues/7
 
+The fastest adoption-trial entry point is:
+
+- https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/issues/5
+
+For an adoption trial, compare one repository boundary with one readiness example and report one useful part, one heavy part, and one adoption blocker. Do not request registry listing unless the maintainer explicitly opts in.
+
 | Lane | Start Here | Review Question |
 | --- | --- | --- |
 | AGENTS.md | templates and example repositories | Are agent instructions specific enough for safe contribution? |
@@ -160,5 +166,5 @@ The reviewer acknowledgement policy explains how useful public feedback can be c
 - AAIF Taxonomy & Landscape Workflows & Process Integration candidate-term contribution: https://github.com/aaif/ws-taxonomy-landscape/issues/19#issuecomment-4884792672
 - v0.5.21 contribution monitor review update: https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/issues/6#issuecomment-4884760432
 - Focused review update: https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/issues/4#issuecomment-4884689614
-- Adoption trial update: https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/issues/5#issuecomment-4884689615
+- Adoption trial intake issue: https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/issues/5
 - External reviewer kickoff: https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/issues/6#issuecomment-4884689621

package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile",
-  "version": "0.5.41",
+  "version": "0.5.42",
   "private": false,
   "type": "module",
   "description": "Evidence-first readiness profile for agentic AI repositories.",

site/index.html

@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ <h1>Make agentic AI repositories easier to review, trust, and extend.</h1>
           <img class="readiness-flow" src="./assets/readiness-flow.svg" alt="Five connected readiness levels from scaffold to foundation candidate.">
           <div class="signal-row">
             <span>Current release</span>
-            <strong>v0.5.41</strong>
+            <strong>v0.5.42</strong>
           </div>
           <div class="signal-row">
             <span>Validation</span>
@@ -109,6 +109,10 @@ <h2>Use it without needing a paid provider or private data.</h2>
             <strong>Discuss routing.</strong>
             Use the public discussion for broader AGENTS.md, MCP, A2A, gateway, Goose, or independent-profile feedback.
           </li>
+          <li>
+            <strong>Try adoption safely.</strong>
+            Use the adoption-trial issue to compare one real repository boundary with one readiness example.
+          </li>
           <li>
             <strong>Close the loop.</strong>
             Classify incoming feedback through the route signal response protocol.
@@ -209,6 +213,10 @@ <h2>Start from the artifacts reviewers usually ask for first.</h2>
             <span>Public Discussion</span>
             <strong>Routing Feedback</strong>
           </a>
+          <a href="https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/issues/5">
+            <span>Adoption Trial</span>
+            <strong>Opt-In Intake</strong>
+          </a>
           <a href="https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/blob/main/docs/MAINTAINER_REVIEW_KIT.md">
             <span>Maintainers</span>
             <strong>Review Kit</strong>