Add public review packet

kmishra1204 · kmishra1204 · commit 6cfd6879609f · 2026-07-04T22:25:49.000-05:00
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ Use these starter artifacts:
 - [Adoption registry](docs/ADOPTION_REGISTRY.md)
 - [External review guide](docs/EXTERNAL_REVIEW_GUIDE.md)
 - [External reviewer program](docs/EXTERNAL_REVIEWER_PROGRAM.md)
+- [Public review packet](docs/PUBLIC_REVIEW_PACKET.md)
 - [Maintainer review kit](docs/MAINTAINER_REVIEW_KIT.md)
 - [Maintainer growth policy](docs/MAINTAINER_GROWTH_POLICY.md)
 - [Release checklist](docs/RELEASE_CHECKLIST.md)
@@ -121,6 +122,7 @@ Good use:
 - Open issues or PRs that improve a concrete repo boundary.
 - Compare the profile against AGENTS.md, MCP, agent gateway, identity, audit, and human-review needs.
 - Use the [maintainer review kit](docs/MAINTAINER_REVIEW_KIT.md), [external review guide](docs/EXTERNAL_REVIEW_GUIDE.md), and [AAIF proposal readiness self-audit](docs/AAIF_PROPOSAL_READINESS.md) before any formal foundation route.
+- Use the [public review packet](docs/PUBLIC_REVIEW_PACKET.md) when asking AAIF/LF-adjacent communities for focused technical feedback.
 
 Bad use:
 
@@ -130,8 +132,8 @@ Bad use:
 
 ## Current Status
 
-Version: `0.5.17`
+Version: `0.5.18`
 
-Status: early OSS profile with public flagship examples, adopter guide, boundary template, scoring guide, ecosystem alignment brief, compatibility policy, adoption registry, external review guide, external reviewer program, maintainer review kit, AAIF proposal readiness self-audit, ecosystem contribution ledger, security posture plan, static docs portal, and community engagement plan.
+Status: early OSS profile with public flagship examples, adopter guide, boundary template, scoring guide, ecosystem alignment brief, compatibility policy, adoption registry, external review guide, external reviewer program, public review packet, maintainer review kit, AAIF proposal readiness self-audit, ecosystem contribution ledger, security posture plan, static docs portal, and community engagement plan.
 
 Next target: external technical feedback from agentic AI maintainers and AAIF/LF-style community forums.
diff --git a/ROADMAP.md b/ROADMAP.md
@@ -102,6 +102,10 @@
 
 - Promote the four second-wave examples to repo-local boundary evidence after publishing product-level `docs/AGENTIC_BOUNDARY_MODEL.md` documents and closing the matching public readiness issues.
 
+## 0.5.18
+
+- Add a single public review packet for AAIF/LF-adjacent forum asks, reviewer routing, current evidence, anti-claims, and copy-ready technical feedback text.
+
 ## 0.6.0
 
 - Add first external adoption example if a maintainer opts in.
diff --git a/docs/PUBLIC_REVIEW_PACKET.md b/docs/PUBLIC_REVIEW_PACKET.md
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+# Public Review Packet
+
+## Purpose
+
+This packet is the single review entry point for maintainers, AAIF/LF-adjacent community members, and enterprise OSS reviewers who want to inspect the Agentic Enterprise Readiness Profile without navigating every release note.
+
+The goal is technical feedback. The goal is not endorsement, affiliation, certification, or project acceptance.
+
+This is an independent OSS profile. It is not an Agentic AI Foundation project, not a Linux Foundation project, and not endorsed by either organization.
+
+## Current Review Surface
+
+| Artifact | Link |
+| --- | --- |
+| Repository | https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile |
+| Docs portal | https://kmishra1204.github.io/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/ |
+| Current release | https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/releases/tag/v0.5.18 |
+| Focused review issue | https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/issues/4 |
+| Adoption trial issue | https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/issues/5 |
+| External reviewer call | https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/issues/6 |
+| Maintainer review kit | docs/MAINTAINER_REVIEW_KIT.md |
+| External reviewer program | docs/EXTERNAL_REVIEWER_PROGRAM.md |
+| Community engagement plan | docs/COMMUNITY_ENGAGEMENT_PLAN.md |
+| AAIF proposal readiness self-audit | docs/AAIF_PROPOSAL_READINESS.md |
+| Ecosystem contribution ledger | docs/ECOSYSTEM_CONTRIBUTION_LEDGER.md |
+
+## What To Review First
+
+Reviewers do not need to review the whole repository.
+
+Pick one lane and one artifact.
+
+| Lane | Start Here | Review Question |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| AGENTS.md | templates and example repositories | Are agent instructions specific enough for safe contribution? |
+| MCP/tooling | boundary model examples | Are tool actions, side effects, and approval points clear? |
+| Agent gateway | gateway and policy evidence | Would this help explain policy, routing, and observability needs? |
+| Security | SECURITY.md, security posture, release checklist | Are the secret, reporting, and supply-chain boundaries credible? |
+| Enterprise adoption | profile levels and testbed examples | Is this too heavy, too light, or useful for due diligence? |
+| OSS maintainer | issue templates, reviewer program, adoption trial | Would this create review burden or reduce repeated questions? |
+
+## Eight Repo-Local Boundary Examples
+
+| Product | Review Domain | Boundary Evidence |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| SecureIDE Workbench | AI coding workbench governance | https://github.com/kmishra1204/secureide-workbench/blob/main/docs/AGENTIC_BOUNDARY_MODEL.md |
+| FlowGrid Orchestrator | MCP-style connector governance | https://github.com/kmishra1204/flowgrid-orchestrator/blob/main/docs/AGENTIC_BOUNDARY_MODEL.md |
+| SupportDesk Intelligence | answer provenance and escalation | https://github.com/kmishra1204/supportdesk-intelligence/blob/main/docs/AGENTIC_BOUNDARY_MODEL.md |
+| AccessGovernance Kit | access policy and audit evidence | https://github.com/kmishra1204/accessgovernance-kit/blob/main/docs/AGENTIC_BOUNDARY_MODEL.md |
+| VoiceGrid Operations | voice consent and transcript governance | https://github.com/kmishra1204/voicegrid-operations/blob/main/docs/AGENTIC_BOUNDARY_MODEL.md |
+| Meeting Intelligence Hub | transcript retention and follow-up approvals | https://github.com/kmishra1204/meeting-intelligence-hub/blob/main/docs/AGENTIC_BOUNDARY_MODEL.md |
+| TenantCommerce Control | tenant-scoped commerce policy and audit | https://github.com/kmishra1204/tenantcommerce-control/blob/main/docs/AGENTIC_BOUNDARY_MODEL.md |
+| LedgerOps Intelligence | finance consent and reconciliation controls | https://github.com/kmishra1204/ledgerops-intelligence/blob/main/docs/AGENTIC_BOUNDARY_MODEL.md |
+
+## Three Useful Review Questions
+
+1. What should be removed because it is too heavy for normal OSS maintainers?
+2. Which field or document would make a real repository review easier?
+3. Should this stay independent, align with AGENTS.md guidance, support MCP/server readiness, or become an agent gateway governance example?
+
+## Copy-Ready Forum Ask
+
+```text
+I am looking for technical feedback, not endorsement.
+
+I maintain an independent OSS Agentic Enterprise Readiness Profile for repositories that need clearer evidence around AGENTS.md instructions, tool/action boundaries, human approval, identity assumptions, audit events, OSS fallbacks, security posture, and reproducible validation.
+
+The current review packet is here:
+https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/blob/main/docs/PUBLIC_REVIEW_PACKET.md
+
+The docs portal is here:
+https://kmishra1204.github.io/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/
+
+The profile now has eight repo-local boundary examples across coding, workflow, support, access, voice, meetings, commerce, and finance domains.
+
+I am trying to understand whether this is useful beside AGENTS.md guidance, MCP/server readiness, agent gateway governance use cases, or whether it should stay independent. If there is a better existing effort, I would rather align than create another checklist.
+```
+
+## What Feedback Can Change
+
+Public feedback can lead to:
+
+- a profile simplification
+- a schema change proposal
+- a boundary model template revision
+- an adoption trial note
+- a compatibility-policy note
+- a new example or removal of a weak example
+- a release note explaining the change
+
+## Anti-Claims
+
+Do not infer any of these from the packet:
+
+- AAIF endorsement
+- Linux Foundation endorsement
+- production readiness
+- security certification
+- adoption by another repository
+- contributor-list credit from open PRs
+- employer endorsement
+
+Contributor credit and ecosystem recognition are claimed only after maintainers merge work or explicitly acknowledge it in public.
+
+## Current Public Review Links
+
+- Focused review update: https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/issues/4#issuecomment-4884689614
+- Adoption trial update: https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/issues/5#issuecomment-4884689615
+- External reviewer kickoff: https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/issues/6#issuecomment-4884689621
diff --git a/package.json b/package.json
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile",
-  "version": "0.5.17",
+  "version": "0.5.18",
   "private": false,
   "type": "module",
   "description": "Evidence-first readiness profile for agentic AI repositories.",
diff --git a/scripts/validate-readiness.mjs b/scripts/validate-readiness.mjs
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ const requiredDocs = [
   "docs/ECOSYSTEM_ALIGNMENT_BRIEF.md",
   "docs/EXTERNAL_REVIEW_GUIDE.md",
   "docs/EXTERNAL_REVIEWER_PROGRAM.md",
+  "docs/PUBLIC_REVIEW_PACKET.md",
   "docs/MAINTAINER_REVIEW_KIT.md",
   "docs/MAINTAINER_GROWTH_POLICY.md",
   "docs/RELEASE_CHECKLIST.md",
@@ -76,6 +77,7 @@ for (const snippet of [
   "AAIF_PROPOSAL_READINESS.md",
   "COMMUNITY_ENGAGEMENT_PLAN.md",
   "EXTERNAL_REVIEWER_PROGRAM.md",
+  "PUBLIC_REVIEW_PACKET.md",
   "not an Agentic AI Foundation project"
 ]) {
   assert(siteText.includes(snippet), `Docs portal missing snippet: ${snippet}`);
diff --git a/site/index.html b/site/index.html
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ <h1>Make agentic AI repositories easier to review, trust, and extend.</h1>
           <img class="readiness-flow" src="./assets/readiness-flow.svg" alt="Five connected readiness levels from scaffold to foundation candidate.">
           <div class="signal-row">
             <span>Current release</span>
-            <strong>v0.5.17</strong>
+            <strong>v0.5.18</strong>
           </div>
           <div class="signal-row">
             <span>Validation</span>
@@ -153,6 +153,10 @@ <h2>Start from the artifacts reviewers usually ask for first.</h2>
             <span>Reviewers</span>
             <strong>Reviewer Program</strong>
           </a>
+          <a href="https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/blob/main/docs/PUBLIC_REVIEW_PACKET.md">
+            <span>Public Review</span>
+            <strong>Review Packet</strong>
+          </a>
           <a href="https://github.com/kmishra1204/agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile/blob/main/docs/MAINTAINER_REVIEW_KIT.md">
             <span>Maintainers</span>
             <strong>Review Kit</strong>

Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@`
`1`	`1`	`{`
`2`	`2`	`"name": "agentic-enterprise-readiness-profile",`
`3`		`- "version": "0.5.17",`
	`3`	`+ "version": "0.5.18",`
`4`	`4`	`"private": false,`
`5`	`5`	`"type": "module",`
`6`	`6`	`"description": "Evidence-first readiness profile for agentic AI repositories.",`