More tests for qwik ?

[seanperez-xyz]

It would be interesting to have different test setup for qwik. To see how it performs using alternative methods.

Current setup ( not typed as QRL)
https://github.com/krausest/js-framework-benchmark/blob/master/frameworks/keyed/qwik/src/components/app/index.tsx#L90-L96

But are defined as QRL $()
https://github.com/krausest/js-framework-benchmark/blob/master/frameworks/keyed/qwik/src/components/app/index.tsx#L171-L198

Uses QRLs in the onClick$={()=> $(…)}
Which returns a Promise

There are several alternatives that could be interesting to test and compare against.

Ref docs

https://qwik.dev/docs/components/tasks/#track-as-a-function

Instead using a Signal in the onClick$={()=> reset.value = true}

And tracking the signal in a useTask$ / useVisibleTask$ and defining the functions inside of the useTask instead of using $() normal sync functions ie

useTask(({track}) => {
track(reset)

const reset= (count: number) => {
      state.data = buildData(count);
      selectedItem.value = null;
      redraw.value++;
      reset.value = false
    }),
  
// … rest of the functions 

If(reset.value){
reset(count)
}
// … rest

If

Potential other methods using useComputed$ useOn…

Other alternatives
Declaring functions out of scope of the component, using signal if needed where positional args can’t be passed to functions in use Tasks scope

Not sure if this would improve or be worst but that’s the point ^_^

What I noticed is in the other tests they use normal functions not functions that return a Promise and I think there might be some improvement, maybe not .