After reading the source I realized that there would be no harm in allowing users to perform all the operations simultaneously– not only optimizing performance, but user productivity!
I propose adding insertUpdateQueryDelete. It'll return 42, but with only the overhead of a single function call.
I know performance is the main concern, but I've checked and it doesn't introduce any (new) bugs, either!
After reading the source I realized that there would be no harm in allowing users to perform all the operations simultaneously– not only optimizing performance, but user productivity!
I propose adding
insertUpdateQueryDelete. It'll return 42, but with only the overhead of a single function call.I know performance is the main concern, but I've checked and it doesn't introduce any (new) bugs, either!