-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.8k
fixed the container runtime documentation #48398
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fixed the container runtime documentation #48398
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
✅ Pull request preview available for checkingBuilt without sensitive environment variables
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ follow [configuring a cgroup driver](/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/kubeadm/conf | |||
|
|||
## CRI version support {#cri-versions} | |||
|
|||
Your container runtime must support at least v1alpha2 of the container runtime interface. | |||
Your container runtime must support at least v1 of the container runtime interface. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Your container runtime must support at least v1 of the container runtime interface. | |
Your container runtime must support v1 of the container runtime interface. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Noted! will apply those chnages.
…he reference for CRI proto
I have made the suggested changes, PTAL. |
Please address this comment as well: #48398 (comment) |
website/content/en/docs/concepts/architecture/cri.md Lines 34 to 35 in 251a596
I am changing the doc here as |
This statement is invalid and need to be changed to simply say that no other versions are supported by the kubelet now: website/content/en/docs/concepts/architecture/cri.md Lines 31 to 33 in 251a596
|
Incorporated the suggested changes. |
Deployment Preview for the |
For Kubernetes v{{< skew currentVersion >}}, the kubelet prefers to use CRI `v1`. | ||
If a container runtime does not support `v1` of the CRI, then the kubelet tries to | ||
negotiate any older supported version. | ||
The v{{< skew currentVersion >}} kubelet can also negotiate CRI `v1alpha2`, but | ||
this version is considered as deprecated. | ||
If the kubelet cannot negotiate a supported CRI version, the kubelet gives up | ||
and doesn't register as a node. | ||
If a container runtime does not support `v1` of the CRI, then the kubelet cannot register as a node. | ||
The v{{< skew currentVersion >}} kubelet only supports CRI `v1`. The deprecated `v1alpha2` API is no longer supported. If the kubelet cannot connect to a container runtime using CRI `v1`, it will give up and will not register as a node. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
now these two paragraphs are saying the same thing twice. Also instead of saying "kubelet gives up" please clarify. I think it still registers the node. It just never removes the Not Ready status.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @SergeyKanzhelev, It would be great if you could suggest a possible change in the documentation. So that i can directly push those changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is basically the task - review docs and update them. Sorry, I only have time to review changes and give a quick feedback. Maybe after code freeze I can find more time.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
no problem!
I'll do the needful.
@thisisharrsh - would you like to update the PR to incorporate pending feedback? |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /close |
@k8s-triage-robot: Closed this PR. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Fixes : #48257