You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are several significant differences in the mathml produced by unicode-math and lua-unicode-math. I opened #1265 for a convenient place to view the diffs in the test xml files when unicode-math is replaced with lua-unicode-math. I mentioned the following in that PR but I will also list them here, and I'm sure there are several more differences.
The prime character ′ in mathml goes from <mo lspace="0" rspace="0">′</mo> to <mi mathvariant="normal">′</mi>. Same for !.
Sometimes several MCs get collapsed into one, sometimes the other way around.
Since all the mathml is put on one line, some of the diffs are very difficult to parse. I wonder how difficult it would be to provide better formatting of the mathml. See, for one example, amsmath-01.
There are several significant differences in the mathml produced by unicode-math and lua-unicode-math. I opened #1265 for a convenient place to view the diffs in the test xml files when
unicode-mathis replaced with lua-unicode-math. I mentioned the following in that PR but I will also list them here, and I'm sure there are several more differences.′in mathml goes from<mo lspace="0" rspace="0">′</mo>to<mi mathvariant="normal">′</mi>. Same for!.AssociatedFiledisappears; see numerica-01. In another an entireFormuladisappears; see longdivision-01.<mover> <mi mathvariant="normal">x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> </mover>becomes<mi> <mglyph/> </mi>which definitely seems wrong.