The name of \colorseriescycle and the phrase vector \emph{last} used in the doc for color series may make users misunderstand that such a series cycle.
In the following example, user may expect foo!![4] == base == {.3,.3,.3}, but actually it's {.6,.6,.6}
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{xcolor}
\begin{document}
\definecolorseries{foo}{rgb}{last}[rgb]{.3,.3,.3}[rgb]{.5,.5,.5}
\resetcolorseries[2]{foo} % step = .1,.1,.1
\ttfamily
\begin{testcolors}[rgb]
\testcolor{foo!![0]}
\testcolor{foo!![1]}
\testcolor{foo!![2]}
\testcolor{foo!![3]}
\end{testcolors}
\end{document}

The relevant doc indicates this is the expected behavior, not a bug.
|
% This is the general scheme: |
|
% \begin{gather} |
|
% \emph{color}_1 := \emph{base},\qquad |
|
% \emph{color}_{n+1} := U\bigl(\emph{color}_{n} + \emph{step}\bigr) |
|
% \end{gather} |
|
% for $n=1,2,\dots$, where $U$ maps arbitrary real $m$-vectors into the unit $m$-cube: |
|
% \begin{gather} |
|
% U(x_1,\dots,x_m) = (u(x_1),\dots,u(x_m)),\qquad |
|
% u(x) = |
|
% \begin{cases} |
|
% 1 & \text{if $x=1$}\\ |
|
% x-[x]& \text{if $x\neq1$}\\ |
|
% \end{cases}\label{eq.U} |
|
% \end{gather} |
|
% Thus, every step of the algorithm yields a valid color with parameters from the interval $[0,1]$. |
Perhaps xcolor could add some words to the doc?
The name of
\colorseriescycleand the phrasevector \emph{last}used in the doc for color series may make users misunderstand that such a series cycle.In the following example, user may expect
foo!![4] == base == {.3,.3,.3}, but actually it's{.6,.6,.6}The relevant doc indicates this is the expected behavior, not a bug.
xcolor/xcolor.dtx
Lines 1267 to 1281 in 1924d5a
Perhaps
xcolorcould add some words to the doc?